SWINDON TOWN: Di Canio overwhelmed by fans' 'special reception'

TRIBUTE: Town fans back Paolo Di Canio during the Hartlepool game

TRIBUTE: Town fans back Paolo Di Canio during the Hartlepool game

First published in Headlines by

PAOLO Di Canio thanked the Swindon Town fans for their very personal show of support towards him during the Robins’ 1-1 draw with Hartlepool on Saturday, but the County Ground boss once again refused to comment further on his future after the match.

Supporters stood up to chant Di Canio’s name in unison for 60 seconds from the 10-minute mark and held aloft posters and banners urging the Italian to stick it out with Town, as he continues to consider his position at the club.

The Swindon manager noted the crowd’s message in his post-match press conference but could not offer fans any assurances that he will commit to remaining with the Robins just yet.

“It was special reception but obviously it is important for the squad and the club, not Paolo Di Canio. I want to thank them. Even if they didn’t come in here with the intention to sing my name, for me it is not important because I know they appreciate the job I have done,” he said.

“I always work for the cause, I am fully professional and until the (last) day I am here I will give my best. I will go angry like I am today because that result hurt me, but I am never going to forget them and everything that happened in five years’ time, two months’ time, one day’s time.

“I started in management here; that is something amazing. I achieved something important with them. I gave them satisfaction, they gave us big satisfaction. That is a special relationship.

“I want to say only that I don’t want to talk about my future. I stand by the statement that I sent out the day before the Crawley game. My position didn’t change yet. I stand by the statement. It is exactly the same situation as the day before the Crawley game.”

Di Canio is believed to have held positive talks with members of the consortium set to buy into the club when a takeover is ratified by the Football League.

Frontman Jed McCrory was at the Hartlepool game alongside another member of the five-strong group, Martin King, who has previous involvement with Luton Town. McCrory spent time in the Legends Lounge talking to fans pre-match.

The Advertiser understands the sale of the club may not go through until Wednesday or Thursday of this week, with McCrory and his partners set to meet the League in Preston to discuss the fine details of their financial model for the Robins going forward.

Each of the incoming directors is understood to have passed their respective fit and proper persons tests, while McCrory is believed to be awaiting special dispensation from the relevant authorities to hold positions at both Swindon and Banbury United until the end of the campaign.

Comments (162)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

6:13am Mon 11 Feb 13

louiscassius says...

Jury's still out on the 'Frontman'

"Jed".............

There must have been a reason he was turned down buying into Luton Town....

Oh god i hate this rubbish, loggin off........

Going to log on Sat morning see the pre match chat......

Sorry guys,this rubbish has been rubbling on for far to long.........and i have a really bad feeling about this guy.......'Jed' the frontman.....

Hope you all have a good week.

Regards

Louis :-(((((
Jury's still out on the 'Frontman' "Jed"............. There must have been a reason he was turned down buying into Luton Town.... Oh god i hate this rubbish, loggin off........ Going to log on Sat morning see the pre match chat...... Sorry guys,this rubbish has been rubbling on for far to long.........and i have a really bad feeling about this guy.......'Jed' the frontman..... Hope you all have a good week. Regards Louis :-((((( louiscassius
  • Score: 0

6:36am Mon 11 Feb 13

DarrenSTFCRomain says...

louiscassius wrote:
Jury's still out on the 'Frontman' "Jed"..........
... There must have been a reason he was turned down buying into Luton Town.... Oh god i hate this rubbish, loggin off........ Going to log on Sat morning see the pre match chat...... Sorry guys,this rubbish has been rubbling on for far to long.........and i have a really bad feeling about this guy.......'Jed' the frontman..... Hope you all have a good week. Regards Louis :-(((((
What do we no about him...NOTHING
SO until then i think the fans should lay off a bit...
[quote][p][bold]louiscassius[/bold] wrote: Jury's still out on the 'Frontman' "Jed".......... ... There must have been a reason he was turned down buying into Luton Town.... Oh god i hate this rubbish, loggin off........ Going to log on Sat morning see the pre match chat...... Sorry guys,this rubbish has been rubbling on for far to long.........and i have a really bad feeling about this guy.......'Jed' the frontman..... Hope you all have a good week. Regards Louis :-((((([/p][/quote]What do we no about him...NOTHING SO until then i think the fans should lay off a bit... DarrenSTFCRomain
  • Score: 0

7:00am Mon 11 Feb 13

SAPFanSTFC says...

louiscassius wrote:
Jury's still out on the 'Frontman'

"Jed"..........
...

There must have been a reason he was turned down buying into Luton Town....

Oh god i hate this rubbish, loggin off........

Going to log on Sat morning see the pre match chat......

Sorry guys,this rubbish has been rubbling on for far to long.........and i have a really bad feeling about this guy.......'Jed' the frontman.....

Hope you all have a good week.

Regards

Louis :-(((((
It's the 'finer details' of the financial model and the guys behind him I'm really worried about - if that was them on Saturday in the private room then lets just prey Paolo stays with us until the end of the season and does it for the fans.
----
I'm going to do the same Louis - logging off until the take-over is resolved but will put up last Saturday's Prediction League results! :-)
----
Have a good week all.
[quote][p][bold]louiscassius[/bold] wrote: Jury's still out on the 'Frontman' "Jed".......... ... There must have been a reason he was turned down buying into Luton Town.... Oh god i hate this rubbish, loggin off........ Going to log on Sat morning see the pre match chat...... Sorry guys,this rubbish has been rubbling on for far to long.........and i have a really bad feeling about this guy.......'Jed' the frontman..... Hope you all have a good week. Regards Louis :-((((([/p][/quote]It's the 'finer details' of the financial model and the guys behind him I'm really worried about - if that was them on Saturday in the private room then lets just prey Paolo stays with us until the end of the season and does it for the fans. ---- I'm going to do the same Louis - logging off until the take-over is resolved but will put up last Saturday's Prediction League results! :-) ---- Have a good week all. SAPFanSTFC
  • Score: 0

7:10am Mon 11 Feb 13

jedthered says...

louiscassius wrote:
Jury's still out on the 'Frontman' "Jed"..........
... There must have been a reason he was turned down buying into Luton Town.... Oh god i hate this rubbish, loggin off........ Going to log on Sat morning see the pre match chat...... Sorry guys,this rubbish has been rubbling on for far to long.........and i have a really bad feeling about this guy.......'Jed' the frontman..... Hope you all have a good week. Regards Louis :-(((((
Each of the incoming directors is understood to have passed their respective fit and proper persons tests, while McCrory is believed to be awaiting special dispensation from the relevant authorities to hold positions at both Swindon and Banbury United until the end of the campaign.

Louis, if you read the column again, the only hold up i can see is wether he will get the dispensation to stay with both clubs. I think we have to be positive about the new owners, if PDC has spoken to them last week and he is still here, perhaps he trusts them as well, we can only wait with bated breath , lol
[quote][p][bold]louiscassius[/bold] wrote: Jury's still out on the 'Frontman' "Jed".......... ... There must have been a reason he was turned down buying into Luton Town.... Oh god i hate this rubbish, loggin off........ Going to log on Sat morning see the pre match chat...... Sorry guys,this rubbish has been rubbling on for far to long.........and i have a really bad feeling about this guy.......'Jed' the frontman..... Hope you all have a good week. Regards Louis :-((((([/p][/quote]Each of the incoming directors is understood to have passed their respective fit and proper persons tests, while McCrory is believed to be awaiting special dispensation from the relevant authorities to hold positions at both Swindon and Banbury United until the end of the campaign. Louis, if you read the column again, the only hold up i can see is wether he will get the dispensation to stay with both clubs. I think we have to be positive about the new owners, if PDC has spoken to them last week and he is still here, perhaps he trusts them as well, we can only wait with bated breath , lol jedthered
  • Score: 0

7:21am Mon 11 Feb 13

SAPFanSTFC says...

jedthered wrote:
louiscassius wrote:
Jury's still out on the 'Frontman' "Jed"..........

... There must have been a reason he was turned down buying into Luton Town.... Oh god i hate this rubbish, loggin off........ Going to log on Sat morning see the pre match chat...... Sorry guys,this rubbish has been rubbling on for far to long.........and i have a really bad feeling about this guy.......'Jed' the frontman..... Hope you all have a good week. Regards Louis :-(((((
Each of the incoming directors is understood to have passed their respective fit and proper persons tests, while McCrory is believed to be awaiting special dispensation from the relevant authorities to hold positions at both Swindon and Banbury United until the end of the campaign.

Louis, if you read the column again, the only hold up i can see is wether he will get the dispensation to stay with both clubs. I think we have to be positive about the new owners, if PDC has spoken to them last week and he is still here, perhaps he trusts them as well, we can only wait with bated breath , lol
Hi there Jed - what is more worrying is who they are and what they have (or don't have) to bring to the table.
...
A small group of people with Jed in a special room on Saturday gave us all 'real' cause for concern as to who they are - pub landlord's day out - was how one person summed it up..... - a really embarrassing chimps tea party - was another.
...
Fit and proper person's test does NOT include a test of wealth, only that they haven't been banned from being a director, chairman or other such board member.
...
We're hoping that there is a surprise in store but it is the future of STFC and not of PDC that gave us real cause for concern Saturday....hope we're laughing over this as a stupid panic post over a beer in the near future matey!
...
Hope you're well and maybe catch up sometime soon!?
[quote][p][bold]jedthered[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]louiscassius[/bold] wrote: Jury's still out on the 'Frontman' "Jed".......... ... There must have been a reason he was turned down buying into Luton Town.... Oh god i hate this rubbish, loggin off........ Going to log on Sat morning see the pre match chat...... Sorry guys,this rubbish has been rubbling on for far to long.........and i have a really bad feeling about this guy.......'Jed' the frontman..... Hope you all have a good week. Regards Louis :-((((([/p][/quote]Each of the incoming directors is understood to have passed their respective fit and proper persons tests, while McCrory is believed to be awaiting special dispensation from the relevant authorities to hold positions at both Swindon and Banbury United until the end of the campaign. Louis, if you read the column again, the only hold up i can see is wether he will get the dispensation to stay with both clubs. I think we have to be positive about the new owners, if PDC has spoken to them last week and he is still here, perhaps he trusts them as well, we can only wait with bated breath , lol[/p][/quote]Hi there Jed - what is more worrying is who they are and what they have (or don't have) to bring to the table. ... A small group of people with Jed in a special room on Saturday gave us all 'real' cause for concern as to who they are - pub landlord's day out - was how one person summed it up..... - a really embarrassing chimps tea party - was another. ... Fit and proper person's test does NOT include a test of wealth, only that they haven't been banned from being a director, chairman or other such board member. ... We're hoping that there is a surprise in store but it is the future of STFC and not of PDC that gave us real cause for concern Saturday....hope we're laughing over this as a stupid panic post over a beer in the near future matey! ... Hope you're well and maybe catch up sometime soon!? SAPFanSTFC
  • Score: 0

7:39am Mon 11 Feb 13

jedthered says...

Hi Ian,
Yeah i know where you are coming from mate, we have been there to often for my liking. But from what i have read and heard i reckon there is a money man(Chairman of Worchester rugby) staying out of the limelight and letting Jed be the mouth piece, well thats my theory any way.We will catch up soon no worries but as you know im always at work, i have booked this week off and was going to go to MK but as you know the best laid plans alway back fires on you. Keep well and keep up the good work.
Onwards and upwards........
Hi Ian, Yeah i know where you are coming from mate, we have been there to often for my liking. But from what i have read and heard i reckon there is a money man(Chairman of Worchester rugby) staying out of the limelight and letting Jed be the mouth piece, well thats my theory any way.We will catch up soon no worries but as you know im always at work, i have booked this week off and was going to go to MK but as you know the best laid plans alway back fires on you. Keep well and keep up the good work. Onwards and upwards........ jedthered
  • Score: 0

8:11am Mon 11 Feb 13

wantage_stfc says...

love how so many seem to know so much yet never reveal their scources , Amazing really how many "experts" follow our club but never put there Expertiese into the club
love how so many seem to know so much yet never reveal their scources , Amazing really how many "experts" follow our club but never put there Expertiese into the club wantage_stfc
  • Score: 0

8:20am Mon 11 Feb 13

London Red says...

Will people either put up or shut up!
.
If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments
.
I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category
.
It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe London Red
  • Score: 0

8:30am Mon 11 Feb 13

Redhouse Red says...

One notes notts county to be issued with winding uo petition at the high court today.

Im sure the league will imposse the relevant embargos
One notes notts county to be issued with winding uo petition at the high court today. Im sure the league will imposse the relevant embargos Redhouse Red
  • Score: 0

9:05am Mon 11 Feb 13

mallorca says...

getting so fed up with al these rumours etc.We know nothing other than who the front man is ref the takeover.
We are told via the Adver all looks positive,all I will say is let us wait until the FL tell us the outcome.
As for Pdc it is time for him to stand up and e counted he either stays or goes????????????????
???
Get thhe feeling he is milking this for all it is worth. Yes we are in a great spot but with no games for 10 days we will be back to games in hand and for the TOWN aint good.
So we wait until Wed or Thursday for ratification and like Pdc the Fl will say YES or NO
So Patience is the key word no more silly rumours etc PLEASE
getting so fed up with al these rumours etc.We know nothing other than who the front man is ref the takeover. We are told via the Adver all looks positive,all I will say is let us wait until the FL tell us the outcome. As for Pdc it is time for him to stand up and e counted he either stays or goes???????????????? ??? Get thhe feeling he is milking this for all it is worth. Yes we are in a great spot but with no games for 10 days we will be back to games in hand and for the TOWN aint good. So we wait until Wed or Thursday for ratification and like Pdc the Fl will say YES or NO So Patience is the key word no more silly rumours etc PLEASE mallorca
  • Score: 0

9:28am Mon 11 Feb 13

SAPFanSTFC says...

jedthered wrote:
Hi Ian,
Yeah i know where you are coming from mate, we have been there to often for my liking. But from what i have read and heard i reckon there is a money man(Chairman of Worchester rugby) staying out of the limelight and letting Jed be the mouth piece, well thats my theory any way.We will catch up soon no worries but as you know im always at work, i have booked this week off and was going to go to MK but as you know the best laid plans alway back fires on you. Keep well and keep up the good work.
Onwards and upwards........
Hi there, If you fancy a beer one evening - Tues / Wed possibly ok?
..I"m off out for the day to help pack my Dad's place up ready for his house move so drop me a text if you still have my number.
.
I'm off this week - Murphy's law I'm off and no games like you! :-( Having said that I'm happier having no games at the moment...and even happier we have a tough game to start us up again next Tuesday - focus the minds!
[quote][p][bold]jedthered[/bold] wrote: Hi Ian, Yeah i know where you are coming from mate, we have been there to often for my liking. But from what i have read and heard i reckon there is a money man(Chairman of Worchester rugby) staying out of the limelight and letting Jed be the mouth piece, well thats my theory any way.We will catch up soon no worries but as you know im always at work, i have booked this week off and was going to go to MK but as you know the best laid plans alway back fires on you. Keep well and keep up the good work. Onwards and upwards........[/p][/quote]Hi there, If you fancy a beer one evening - Tues / Wed possibly ok? ..I"m off out for the day to help pack my Dad's place up ready for his house move so drop me a text if you still have my number. . I'm off this week - Murphy's law I'm off and no games like you! :-( Having said that I'm happier having no games at the moment...and even happier we have a tough game to start us up again next Tuesday - focus the minds! SAPFanSTFC
  • Score: 0

9:29am Mon 11 Feb 13

multipostingshouldbebanned says...

London Red wrote:
Will people either put up or shut up!
.
If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments
.
I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category
.
It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
Am posting under a different identity just for this one post so that I don't receive loads of grief.

I have been reading/posting on here for around 12 months, and have come to the conclusion that if SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B were to post under completely new identities, very few people would find their posts worthy of comment.

For the most part they quote/re-quote, copy or even copy and paste each other so often that it is near impossible to find anything original written.

There are only 2 "regular" posters that are worth reading...LR and Wiz because what they have to say is based on fact with opinion.

I should mention that there are many other posters that visit this site that offer very good opinions and have interesting arguments/discussion
s.
I am in no way targetting you.
I am just tired as I am sure others are of hearing the same rubbish spouted by the same few.
[quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]Am posting under a different identity just for this one post so that I don't receive loads of grief. I have been reading/posting on here for around 12 months, and have come to the conclusion that if SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B were to post under completely new identities, very few people would find their posts worthy of comment. For the most part they quote/re-quote, copy or even copy and paste each other so often that it is near impossible to find anything original written. There are only 2 "regular" posters that are worth reading...LR and Wiz because what they have to say is based on fact with opinion. I should mention that there are many other posters that visit this site that offer very good opinions and have interesting arguments/discussion s. I am in no way targetting you. I am just tired as I am sure others are of hearing the same rubbish spouted by the same few. multipostingshouldbebanned
  • Score: 0

9:30am Mon 11 Feb 13

Highworth red says...

It feels like we are a ship on the ocean in a storm with no engines. As for Paolo, I have always been a supporter, but I've had enough now. If he doesn't want to commit and isn't happy, then go and let somebody else have a crack. We have a decent squad and any half decent manager could get results with them. I can assure you there wouldn't be a shortage of applications for the job.
It feels like we are a ship on the ocean in a storm with no engines. As for Paolo, I have always been a supporter, but I've had enough now. If he doesn't want to commit and isn't happy, then go and let somebody else have a crack. We have a decent squad and any half decent manager could get results with them. I can assure you there wouldn't be a shortage of applications for the job. Highworth red
  • Score: 0

9:32am Mon 11 Feb 13

SAPFanSTFC says...

London Red wrote:
Will people either put up or shut up!
.
If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments
.
I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category
.
It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them.
...
As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!!
...
No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-)
...
I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)
[quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-) SAPFanSTFC
  • Score: 0

9:33am Mon 11 Feb 13

SAPFanSTFC says...

Now I gotta go and not back until Thurs/Friday!...happ
y days for you! :-)
Now I gotta go and not back until Thurs/Friday!...happ y days for you! :-) SAPFanSTFC
  • Score: 0

9:43am Mon 11 Feb 13

Chish and Fips says...

Highworth red wrote:
It feels like we are a ship on the ocean in a storm with no engines. As for Paolo, I have always been a supporter, but I've had enough now. If he doesn't want to commit and isn't happy, then go and let somebody else have a crack. We have a decent squad and any half decent manager could get results with them. I can assure you there wouldn't be a shortage of applications for the job.
Yep tend to agree its getting a bit tedious now.

Will be difficult to replace in some ways but sure an experienced manager would hopefully win back the PDC fan club.
[quote][p][bold]Highworth red[/bold] wrote: It feels like we are a ship on the ocean in a storm with no engines. As for Paolo, I have always been a supporter, but I've had enough now. If he doesn't want to commit and isn't happy, then go and let somebody else have a crack. We have a decent squad and any half decent manager could get results with them. I can assure you there wouldn't be a shortage of applications for the job.[/p][/quote]Yep tend to agree its getting a bit tedious now. Will be difficult to replace in some ways but sure an experienced manager would hopefully win back the PDC fan club. Chish and Fips
  • Score: 0

9:49am Mon 11 Feb 13

Davidsyrett says...

multipostingshouldbe
banned
wrote:
London Red wrote:
Will people either put up or shut up!
.
If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments
.
I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category
.
It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
Am posting under a different identity just for this one post so that I don't receive loads of grief.

I have been reading/posting on here for around 12 months, and have come to the conclusion that if SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B were to post under completely new identities, very few people would find their posts worthy of comment.

For the most part they quote/re-quote, copy or even copy and paste each other so often that it is near impossible to find anything original written.

There are only 2 "regular" posters that are worth reading...LR and Wiz because what they have to say is based on fact with opinion.

I should mention that there are many other posters that visit this site that offer very good opinions and have interesting arguments/discussion

s.
I am in no way targetting you.
I am just tired as I am sure others are of hearing the same rubbish spouted by the same few.
Chill out, as has been said before, this is a forum for opinions nothing else. everyone puts in their point of view, take it or leave it!

Much as I agree that most of the post's by Wizard & LR are a good read, they like most of us are not in the "know" and speculate, not always getting it right. Most of the regulars often come up with decent postings, just be wary of the first time posters, Oh like yourself!!
[quote][p][bold]multipostingshouldbe banned[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]Am posting under a different identity just for this one post so that I don't receive loads of grief. I have been reading/posting on here for around 12 months, and have come to the conclusion that if SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B were to post under completely new identities, very few people would find their posts worthy of comment. For the most part they quote/re-quote, copy or even copy and paste each other so often that it is near impossible to find anything original written. There are only 2 "regular" posters that are worth reading...LR and Wiz because what they have to say is based on fact with opinion. I should mention that there are many other posters that visit this site that offer very good opinions and have interesting arguments/discussion s. I am in no way targetting you. I am just tired as I am sure others are of hearing the same rubbish spouted by the same few.[/p][/quote]Chill out, as has been said before, this is a forum for opinions nothing else. everyone puts in their point of view, take it or leave it! Much as I agree that most of the post's by Wizard & LR are a good read, they like most of us are not in the "know" and speculate, not always getting it right. Most of the regulars often come up with decent postings, just be wary of the first time posters, Oh like yourself!! Davidsyrett
  • Score: 0

9:52am Mon 11 Feb 13

London Red says...

SAP - think you missed the point - like Lydiard said I don't care who told you
.
What we want is why you are worried
.
For example you could say Robert Maxwell is part of the consortium and due to his record at the Mirror and what he tried to do to Pox/Reading I'm worried about STFC
.
Or Jed and co are raising money Glazier stylie so I'm concerned we will be cripped with interest payments for years to come which would wipe out any potential profit we could dream of in the Championship
.
Thats what we want to hear the actual news part - not where it came from
.
N o onereally cares about who said it - If you post I was told this by someone I trust and it comes true - i.e. we are signing X on Fri - then if it happens people will believe you in the future - if it doesn't people wont - and your source is uneffected either way!
SAP - think you missed the point - like Lydiard said I don't care who told you . What we want is why you are worried . For example you could say Robert Maxwell is part of the consortium and due to his record at the Mirror and what he tried to do to Pox/Reading I'm worried about STFC . Or Jed and co are raising money Glazier stylie so I'm concerned we will be cripped with interest payments for years to come which would wipe out any potential profit we could dream of in the Championship . Thats what we want to hear the actual news part - not where it came from . N o onereally cares about who said it - If you post I was told this by someone I trust and it comes true - i.e. we are signing X on Fri - then if it happens people will believe you in the future - if it doesn't people wont - and your source is uneffected either way! London Red
  • Score: 0

10:01am Mon 11 Feb 13

jontyg says...

wantage_stfc wrote:
love how so many seem to know so much yet never reveal their scources , Amazing really how many "experts" follow our club but never put there Expertiese into the club
Sums it up nicely.
[quote][p][bold]wantage_stfc[/bold] wrote: love how so many seem to know so much yet never reveal their scources , Amazing really how many "experts" follow our club but never put there Expertiese into the club[/p][/quote]Sums it up nicely. jontyg
  • Score: 0

10:02am Mon 11 Feb 13

the don69 says...

multipostingshouldbe
banned
wrote:
London Red wrote:
Will people either put up or shut up!
.
If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments
.
I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category
.
It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
Am posting under a different identity just for this one post so that I don't receive loads of grief.

I have been reading/posting on here for around 12 months, and have come to the conclusion that if SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B were to post under completely new identities, very few people would find their posts worthy of comment.

For the most part they quote/re-quote, copy or even copy and paste each other so often that it is near impossible to find anything original written.

There are only 2 "regular" posters that are worth reading...LR and Wiz because what they have to say is based on fact with opinion.

I should mention that there are many other posters that visit this site that offer very good opinions and have interesting arguments/discussion

s.
I am in no way targetting you.
I am just tired as I am sure others are of hearing the same rubbish spouted by the same few.
Oh I wonder what your identities are then?and what drivel you might spout?simple if your tired of a lot of the rubbish spouted on this site!find something else to do,it's your choice,read or not to read that is the question you need to ask yourself!!!!!!!!!!!
[quote][p][bold]multipostingshouldbe banned[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]Am posting under a different identity just for this one post so that I don't receive loads of grief. I have been reading/posting on here for around 12 months, and have come to the conclusion that if SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B were to post under completely new identities, very few people would find their posts worthy of comment. For the most part they quote/re-quote, copy or even copy and paste each other so often that it is near impossible to find anything original written. There are only 2 "regular" posters that are worth reading...LR and Wiz because what they have to say is based on fact with opinion. I should mention that there are many other posters that visit this site that offer very good opinions and have interesting arguments/discussion s. I am in no way targetting you. I am just tired as I am sure others are of hearing the same rubbish spouted by the same few.[/p][/quote]Oh I wonder what your identities are then?and what drivel you might spout?simple if your tired of a lot of the rubbish spouted on this site!find something else to do,it's your choice,read or not to read that is the question you need to ask yourself!!!!!!!!!!! the don69
  • Score: 0

10:02am Mon 11 Feb 13

stfclondon says...

Chish and Fips wrote:
Highworth red wrote: It feels like we are a ship on the ocean in a storm with no engines. As for Paolo, I have always been a supporter, but I've had enough now. If he doesn't want to commit and isn't happy, then go and let somebody else have a crack. We have a decent squad and any half decent manager could get results with them. I can assure you there wouldn't be a shortage of applications for the job.
Yep tend to agree its getting a bit tedious now. Will be difficult to replace in some ways but sure an experienced manager would hopefully win back the PDC fan club.
I don't understand either of your comments. The club is in a state of transition and nobody knows for sure what is going to happen, so how can you expect the manager to commit his future? The message he gave before the Crawley game was that he was considering his position and, as yet, nothing has changed. Why would it?

Once the takeover goes through and the new board give a clear indication of how they plan to take the club forward, that will be the right time for Di Canio to decide where his future lies.

Think about it - if your employer was going through a similar takeover process and you didn't know what the prospective owners' plans are, let alone what your terms of employment will be, would you make a commitment to that company? Of course not - you would consider your position and make your decision when the situation becomes clearer. There's too much uncertainty at the moment, so all we can hope is that it's wrapped up in the next couple of days.
[quote][p][bold]Chish and Fips[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Highworth red[/bold] wrote: It feels like we are a ship on the ocean in a storm with no engines. As for Paolo, I have always been a supporter, but I've had enough now. If he doesn't want to commit and isn't happy, then go and let somebody else have a crack. We have a decent squad and any half decent manager could get results with them. I can assure you there wouldn't be a shortage of applications for the job.[/p][/quote]Yep tend to agree its getting a bit tedious now. Will be difficult to replace in some ways but sure an experienced manager would hopefully win back the PDC fan club.[/p][/quote]I don't understand either of your comments. The club is in a state of transition and nobody knows for sure what is going to happen, so how can you expect the manager to commit his future? The message he gave before the Crawley game was that he was considering his position and, as yet, nothing has changed. Why would it? Once the takeover goes through and the new board give a clear indication of how they plan to take the club forward, that will be the right time for Di Canio to decide where his future lies. Think about it - if your employer was going through a similar takeover process and you didn't know what the prospective owners' plans are, let alone what your terms of employment will be, would you make a commitment to that company? Of course not - you would consider your position and make your decision when the situation becomes clearer. There's too much uncertainty at the moment, so all we can hope is that it's wrapped up in the next couple of days. stfclondon
  • Score: 0

10:02am Mon 11 Feb 13

Highworth red says...

Chish and Fips wrote:
Highworth red wrote:
It feels like we are a ship on the ocean in a storm with no engines. As for Paolo, I have always been a supporter, but I've had enough now. If he doesn't want to commit and isn't happy, then go and let somebody else have a crack. We have a decent squad and any half decent manager could get results with them. I can assure you there wouldn't be a shortage of applications for the job.
Yep tend to agree its getting a bit tedious now.

Will be difficult to replace in some ways but sure an experienced manager would hopefully win back the PDC fan club.
I hope he does stay Chish, but if not, make the decision and move on. There has been a change in Paolo recently and I wonder if he is actually burning himself out. The man is so intense and puts in so many hours to the cause that it could be having a physical effect on him. The uncertainty over the takeover would not help either. Paolo is not superman, he's just flesh and bone like the rest of us. Unfortunately, I dont think he knows any other way other than work work work.
[quote][p][bold]Chish and Fips[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Highworth red[/bold] wrote: It feels like we are a ship on the ocean in a storm with no engines. As for Paolo, I have always been a supporter, but I've had enough now. If he doesn't want to commit and isn't happy, then go and let somebody else have a crack. We have a decent squad and any half decent manager could get results with them. I can assure you there wouldn't be a shortage of applications for the job.[/p][/quote]Yep tend to agree its getting a bit tedious now. Will be difficult to replace in some ways but sure an experienced manager would hopefully win back the PDC fan club.[/p][/quote]I hope he does stay Chish, but if not, make the decision and move on. There has been a change in Paolo recently and I wonder if he is actually burning himself out. The man is so intense and puts in so many hours to the cause that it could be having a physical effect on him. The uncertainty over the takeover would not help either. Paolo is not superman, he's just flesh and bone like the rest of us. Unfortunately, I dont think he knows any other way other than work work work. Highworth red
  • Score: 0

10:10am Mon 11 Feb 13

Highworth red says...

stfclondon wrote:
Chish and Fips wrote:
Highworth red wrote: It feels like we are a ship on the ocean in a storm with no engines. As for Paolo, I have always been a supporter, but I've had enough now. If he doesn't want to commit and isn't happy, then go and let somebody else have a crack. We have a decent squad and any half decent manager could get results with them. I can assure you there wouldn't be a shortage of applications for the job.
Yep tend to agree its getting a bit tedious now. Will be difficult to replace in some ways but sure an experienced manager would hopefully win back the PDC fan club.
I don't understand either of your comments. The club is in a state of transition and nobody knows for sure what is going to happen, so how can you expect the manager to commit his future? The message he gave before the Crawley game was that he was considering his position and, as yet, nothing has changed. Why would it?

Once the takeover goes through and the new board give a clear indication of how they plan to take the club forward, that will be the right time for Di Canio to decide where his future lies.

Think about it - if your employer was going through a similar takeover process and you didn't know what the prospective owners' plans are, let alone what your terms of employment will be, would you make a commitment to that company? Of course not - you would consider your position and make your decision when the situation becomes clearer. There's too much uncertainty at the moment, so all we can hope is that it's wrapped up in the next couple of days.
Im sure you're probably right, but Paolo has met the board already, so must have a good idea what he wants to do. He could easily have told the fans that he is here and is happy to continue, therefore not adding to the worry and uncertanty at this time among fans. Its being in limbo with him which is not good. Its a horrible time for all concerned off the field, thank goodness all on the field is looking so positive.
[quote][p][bold]stfclondon[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chish and Fips[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Highworth red[/bold] wrote: It feels like we are a ship on the ocean in a storm with no engines. As for Paolo, I have always been a supporter, but I've had enough now. If he doesn't want to commit and isn't happy, then go and let somebody else have a crack. We have a decent squad and any half decent manager could get results with them. I can assure you there wouldn't be a shortage of applications for the job.[/p][/quote]Yep tend to agree its getting a bit tedious now. Will be difficult to replace in some ways but sure an experienced manager would hopefully win back the PDC fan club.[/p][/quote]I don't understand either of your comments. The club is in a state of transition and nobody knows for sure what is going to happen, so how can you expect the manager to commit his future? The message he gave before the Crawley game was that he was considering his position and, as yet, nothing has changed. Why would it? Once the takeover goes through and the new board give a clear indication of how they plan to take the club forward, that will be the right time for Di Canio to decide where his future lies. Think about it - if your employer was going through a similar takeover process and you didn't know what the prospective owners' plans are, let alone what your terms of employment will be, would you make a commitment to that company? Of course not - you would consider your position and make your decision when the situation becomes clearer. There's too much uncertainty at the moment, so all we can hope is that it's wrapped up in the next couple of days.[/p][/quote]Im sure you're probably right, but Paolo has met the board already, so must have a good idea what he wants to do. He could easily have told the fans that he is here and is happy to continue, therefore not adding to the worry and uncertanty at this time among fans. Its being in limbo with him which is not good. Its a horrible time for all concerned off the field, thank goodness all on the field is looking so positive. Highworth red
  • Score: 0

10:16am Mon 11 Feb 13

Stilloyal says...

All I'm concerned about at this moment is the saving of our club and no points deduction.
Making it to the end of the season and getting promotion is my goal, keeping Paolo is the icing and cherry on the cake.
What happens pre next season is for us to be concerned about then, meanwhile lets bask in the fact we are (will be ) saved and we are in a great league position with the best manager outside the premiership.

I only deal in facts and figures, I totally disregard rumours and stuff posted here without substance.

Was brilliant to see everyone standing and chanting Paolo's name on the ten minute mark in each half, well done everyone.
All I'm concerned about at this moment is the saving of our club and no points deduction. Making it to the end of the season and getting promotion is my goal, keeping Paolo is the icing and cherry on the cake. What happens pre next season is for us to be concerned about then, meanwhile lets bask in the fact we are (will be ) saved and we are in a great league position with the best manager outside the premiership. I only deal in facts and figures, I totally disregard rumours and stuff posted here without substance. Was brilliant to see everyone standing and chanting Paolo's name on the ten minute mark in each half, well done everyone. Stilloyal
  • Score: 0

10:17am Mon 11 Feb 13

Oi Den! says...

multipostingshouldbe
banned
wrote:
London Red wrote:
Will people either put up or shut up!
.
If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments
.
I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category
.
It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
Am posting under a different identity just for this one post so that I don't receive loads of grief.

I have been reading/posting on here for around 12 months, and have come to the conclusion that if SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B were to post under completely new identities, very few people would find their posts worthy of comment.

For the most part they quote/re-quote, copy or even copy and paste each other so often that it is near impossible to find anything original written.

There are only 2 "regular" posters that are worth reading...LR and Wiz because what they have to say is based on fact with opinion.

I should mention that there are many other posters that visit this site that offer very good opinions and have interesting arguments/discussion

s.
I am in no way targetting you.
I am just tired as I am sure others are of hearing the same rubbish spouted by the same few.
I'll plead guilty to the charge m'lud.
[quote][p][bold]multipostingshouldbe banned[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]Am posting under a different identity just for this one post so that I don't receive loads of grief. I have been reading/posting on here for around 12 months, and have come to the conclusion that if SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B were to post under completely new identities, very few people would find their posts worthy of comment. For the most part they quote/re-quote, copy or even copy and paste each other so often that it is near impossible to find anything original written. There are only 2 "regular" posters that are worth reading...LR and Wiz because what they have to say is based on fact with opinion. I should mention that there are many other posters that visit this site that offer very good opinions and have interesting arguments/discussion s. I am in no way targetting you. I am just tired as I am sure others are of hearing the same rubbish spouted by the same few.[/p][/quote]I'll plead guilty to the charge m'lud. Oi Den!
  • Score: 0

10:19am Mon 11 Feb 13

davel4848 says...

Three sets of people know what's going on...........Paolo di Canio..........the incoming board...............
..the Football League.
No-one else, NO-ONE, so yes, have ideas and thoughts but stop coming on here saying 'I know............'. and 'So and so knows this and that'. It's pathetic.
Three sets of people know what's going on...........Paolo di Canio..........the incoming board............... ..the Football League. No-one else, NO-ONE, so yes, have ideas and thoughts but stop coming on here saying 'I know............'. and 'So and so knows this and that'. It's pathetic. davel4848
  • Score: 0

10:36am Mon 11 Feb 13

the don69 says...

Oi Den! wrote:
multipostingshouldbe

banned
wrote:
London Red wrote:
Will people either put up or shut up!
.
If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments
.
I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category
.
It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
Am posting under a different identity just for this one post so that I don't receive loads of grief.

I have been reading/posting on here for around 12 months, and have come to the conclusion that if SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B were to post under completely new identities, very few people would find their posts worthy of comment.

For the most part they quote/re-quote, copy or even copy and paste each other so often that it is near impossible to find anything original written.

There are only 2 "regular" posters that are worth reading...LR and Wiz because what they have to say is based on fact with opinion.

I should mention that there are many other posters that visit this site that offer very good opinions and have interesting arguments/discussion


s.
I am in no way targetting you.
I am just tired as I am sure others are of hearing the same rubbish spouted by the same few.
I'll plead guilty to the charge m'lud.
He'll be putting his black cap on now Den!LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[quote][p][bold]Oi Den![/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]multipostingshouldbe banned[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]Am posting under a different identity just for this one post so that I don't receive loads of grief. I have been reading/posting on here for around 12 months, and have come to the conclusion that if SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B were to post under completely new identities, very few people would find their posts worthy of comment. For the most part they quote/re-quote, copy or even copy and paste each other so often that it is near impossible to find anything original written. There are only 2 "regular" posters that are worth reading...LR and Wiz because what they have to say is based on fact with opinion. I should mention that there are many other posters that visit this site that offer very good opinions and have interesting arguments/discussion s. I am in no way targetting you. I am just tired as I am sure others are of hearing the same rubbish spouted by the same few.[/p][/quote]I'll plead guilty to the charge m'lud.[/p][/quote]He'll be putting his black cap on now Den!LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!! the don69
  • Score: 0

11:35am Mon 11 Feb 13

Wilesy says...

multipostingshouldbe
banned
wrote:
London Red wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
Am posting under a different identity just for this one post so that I don't receive loads of grief. I have been reading/posting on here for around 12 months, and have come to the conclusion that if SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B were to post under completely new identities, very few people would find their posts worthy of comment. For the most part they quote/re-quote, copy or even copy and paste each other so often that it is near impossible to find anything original written. There are only 2 "regular" posters that are worth reading...LR and Wiz because what they have to say is based on fact with opinion. I should mention that there are many other posters that visit this site that offer very good opinions and have interesting arguments/discussion s. I am in no way targetting you. I am just tired as I am sure others are of hearing the same rubbish spouted by the same few.
I disagree completely I find the football related views and opinions of SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B (as well as Wiz, LR and most other posters) very interesting.

In an ideal world the couple of seemingly never-ending feuds could be finished or taken off-line, but apart from that all good stuff, and highly unfair to say these posters are spouting rubbish.

In the meantime I will try and make my posts more factual and interesting and seek to gain your approval :-)
[quote][p][bold]multipostingshouldbe banned[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]Am posting under a different identity just for this one post so that I don't receive loads of grief. I have been reading/posting on here for around 12 months, and have come to the conclusion that if SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B were to post under completely new identities, very few people would find their posts worthy of comment. For the most part they quote/re-quote, copy or even copy and paste each other so often that it is near impossible to find anything original written. There are only 2 "regular" posters that are worth reading...LR and Wiz because what they have to say is based on fact with opinion. I should mention that there are many other posters that visit this site that offer very good opinions and have interesting arguments/discussion s. I am in no way targetting you. I am just tired as I am sure others are of hearing the same rubbish spouted by the same few.[/p][/quote]I disagree completely I find the football related views and opinions of SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B (as well as Wiz, LR and most other posters) very interesting. In an ideal world the couple of seemingly never-ending feuds could be finished or taken off-line, but apart from that all good stuff, and highly unfair to say these posters are spouting rubbish. In the meantime I will try and make my posts more factual and interesting and seek to gain your approval :-) Wilesy
  • Score: 0

11:46am Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

SAPFanSTFC wrote:
London Red wrote:
Will people either put up or shut up!
.
If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments
.
I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category
.
It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them.
...
As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!!
...
No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-)
...
I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)
SAP,
NO, jobs dont depend on whether you spill the beans on who you claim to have seen in the "MEMBERS LOUNGE"
If it was all secretive and cloak and dagger style they wouldnt be in the lounge, normally i like you and your posts but the the longer this whole debracle drags on and the more fans we have in the know but not preparred to share the love is begining to wear a little thin.
I feel we have a team that is supported purely by free masons as what they hear and say is all hidden from the real world and stays in the lodge.
In a nut shell who did you see in the "lounge" and if it was pure speculation by a third party and your not prepared to keep the rest of us in the loop please dont brag that you know the tea lady, who is waxing the boot boy, whos brother is the managers office cleaner, and is best mates with nick watkins sons football coach younger brother, whom he sits along side at cookery class during school.
Sorry if i offended you but were all pi55ed offf with this situation now and some posters dont help other peoples nervous disposition with claims of "I KNOW THIS AND THAT COS SPECULATION MEANS YOU KNOW F$&£ ALL"
However if because you are privvy to the members lounge and think it gives you more right to post on our club forum then think again.
Cheers
[quote][p][bold]SAPFanSTFC[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)[/p][/quote]SAP, NO, jobs dont depend on whether you spill the beans on who you claim to have seen in the "MEMBERS LOUNGE" If it was all secretive and cloak and dagger style they wouldnt be in the lounge, normally i like you and your posts but the the longer this whole debracle drags on and the more fans we have in the know but not preparred to share the love is begining to wear a little thin. I feel we have a team that is supported purely by free masons as what they hear and say is all hidden from the real world and stays in the lodge. In a nut shell who did you see in the "lounge" and if it was pure speculation by a third party and your not prepared to keep the rest of us in the loop please dont brag that you know the tea lady, who is waxing the boot boy, whos brother is the managers office cleaner, and is best mates with nick watkins sons football coach younger brother, whom he sits along side at cookery class during school. Sorry if i offended you but were all pi55ed offf with this situation now and some posters dont help other peoples nervous disposition with claims of "I KNOW THIS AND THAT COS SPECULATION MEANS YOU KNOW F$&£ ALL" However if because you are privvy to the members lounge and think it gives you more right to post on our club forum then think again. Cheers spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

11:49am Mon 11 Feb 13

London Red says...

multipostingshouldbe
banned is not me by the way - think posters will know I not overly bothered if posters on here like me or not so would post under my own username
.
I also don't have any ongoing feud with anyone (my side) - if I don't agree with anything I will say so!
.
But that is it done and duested for me and will respond to next post depending on what is written in that post (by that I mean different thread - as onging to me means continuing same disagreement on a new day and in a new article not just a reply)
multipostingshouldbe banned is not me by the way - think posters will know I not overly bothered if posters on here like me or not so would post under my own username . I also don't have any ongoing feud with anyone (my side) - if I don't agree with anything I will say so! . But that is it done and duested for me and will respond to next post depending on what is written in that post (by that I mean different thread - as onging to me means continuing same disagreement on a new day and in a new article not just a reply) London Red
  • Score: 0

11:57am Mon 11 Feb 13

the don69 says...

spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
SAPFanSTFC wrote:
London Red wrote:
Will people either put up or shut up!
.
If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments
.
I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category
.
It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them.
...
As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!!
...
No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-)
...
I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)
SAP,
NO, jobs dont depend on whether you spill the beans on who you claim to have seen in the "MEMBERS LOUNGE"
If it was all secretive and cloak and dagger style they wouldnt be in the lounge, normally i like you and your posts but the the longer this whole debracle drags on and the more fans we have in the know but not preparred to share the love is begining to wear a little thin.
I feel we have a team that is supported purely by free masons as what they hear and say is all hidden from the real world and stays in the lodge.
In a nut shell who did you see in the "lounge" and if it was pure speculation by a third party and your not prepared to keep the rest of us in the loop please dont brag that you know the tea lady, who is waxing the boot boy, whos brother is the managers office cleaner, and is best mates with nick watkins sons football coach younger brother, whom he sits along side at cookery class during school.
Sorry if i offended you but were all pi55ed offf with this situation now and some posters dont help other peoples nervous disposition with claims of "I KNOW THIS AND THAT COS SPECULATION MEANS YOU KNOW F$&£ ALL"
However if because you are privvy to the members lounge and think it gives you more right to post on our club forum then think again.
Cheers
Good Post Spectacles Testicals (daft name)put up or shut the feck up!!!!!!!!!!!!
[quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SAPFanSTFC[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)[/p][/quote]SAP, NO, jobs dont depend on whether you spill the beans on who you claim to have seen in the "MEMBERS LOUNGE" If it was all secretive and cloak and dagger style they wouldnt be in the lounge, normally i like you and your posts but the the longer this whole debracle drags on and the more fans we have in the know but not preparred to share the love is begining to wear a little thin. I feel we have a team that is supported purely by free masons as what they hear and say is all hidden from the real world and stays in the lodge. In a nut shell who did you see in the "lounge" and if it was pure speculation by a third party and your not prepared to keep the rest of us in the loop please dont brag that you know the tea lady, who is waxing the boot boy, whos brother is the managers office cleaner, and is best mates with nick watkins sons football coach younger brother, whom he sits along side at cookery class during school. Sorry if i offended you but were all pi55ed offf with this situation now and some posters dont help other peoples nervous disposition with claims of "I KNOW THIS AND THAT COS SPECULATION MEANS YOU KNOW F$&£ ALL" However if because you are privvy to the members lounge and think it gives you more right to post on our club forum then think again. Cheers[/p][/quote]Good Post Spectacles Testicals (daft name)put up or shut the feck up!!!!!!!!!!!! the don69
  • Score: 0

12:05pm Mon 11 Feb 13

mallorca says...

Where will all this crap end??????
even the Masonic brotherhood has been brought into this silly silly debate.
As I said and many more have posted.
We await to hear from the FL
also if Pdc is staying or going,these are the two main questions.
Most posts on here are sensible however at the end of the day we will just have to wait for the outcome
Where will all this crap end?????? even the Masonic brotherhood has been brought into this silly silly debate. As I said and many more have posted. We await to hear from the FL also if Pdc is staying or going,these are the two main questions. Most posts on here are sensible however at the end of the day we will just have to wait for the outcome mallorca
  • Score: 0

12:19pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

mallorca wrote:
Where will all this crap end??????
even the Masonic brotherhood has been brought into this silly silly debate.
As I said and many more have posted.
We await to hear from the FL
also if Pdc is staying or going,these are the two main questions.
Most posts on here are sensible however at the end of the day we will just have to wait for the outcome
Mallorca the masonic lodge was only mentioned as an example of the cloak and dagger approach takenby some that they know but dare not repeat, i am not claiming the masons are in on the act and what they get up to is there own business. Like you i will wait for the FL outcome and see where that leaves us in relation to PDC's position. I am all for healthy debate and potential scenarios but not scaremongering and unfounded speculation. Some people are now even to begining to question whether PDC is the right manager for us!!!!
Its taken 18 months, a Wembley final, league champions and currently third in the table to decide this while he is considering if his future lies elsewhere. He owes us nothing we owe him nothing and if he did ever go on this site would he be in 2 minds as to stay with what some post about him and after the way the board have acted.
[quote][p][bold]mallorca[/bold] wrote: Where will all this crap end?????? even the Masonic brotherhood has been brought into this silly silly debate. As I said and many more have posted. We await to hear from the FL also if Pdc is staying or going,these are the two main questions. Most posts on here are sensible however at the end of the day we will just have to wait for the outcome[/p][/quote]Mallorca the masonic lodge was only mentioned as an example of the cloak and dagger approach takenby some that they know but dare not repeat, i am not claiming the masons are in on the act and what they get up to is there own business. Like you i will wait for the FL outcome and see where that leaves us in relation to PDC's position. I am all for healthy debate and potential scenarios but not scaremongering and unfounded speculation. Some people are now even to begining to question whether PDC is the right manager for us!!!! Its taken 18 months, a Wembley final, league champions and currently third in the table to decide this while he is considering if his future lies elsewhere. He owes us nothing we owe him nothing and if he did ever go on this site would he be in 2 minds as to stay with what some post about him and after the way the board have acted. spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

12:21pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Is that you Lovesey says...

OMG, I am getting bored with this, we hae no influence in what is happening only when supporting the team, which we all did on Saturday, we all want whats best for the club.... End of. So why are you all schoolyard bickering on here, its boring....
OMG, I am getting bored with this, we hae no influence in what is happening only when supporting the team, which we all did on Saturday, we all want whats best for the club.... End of. So why are you all schoolyard bickering on here, its boring.... Is that you Lovesey
  • Score: 0

12:26pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

Is that you Lovesey wrote:
OMG, I am getting bored with this, we hae no influence in what is happening only when supporting the team, which we all did on Saturday, we all want whats best for the club.... End of. So why are you all schoolyard bickering on here, its boring....
No its not school yard bickering is great and far from boring bt did you know i too my kids Saturdy and there was a steward stood near where we sat and he said that if PDC didnt like the new board he would infact poison them in order to take total control of the club himself and do what he wants when he wants (but remember i dare not tell you which steward) as PDC may have him also bumped off and he wouldnt get in for free again and be able to make up such ludicrous rumours;-)
[quote][p][bold]Is that you Lovesey[/bold] wrote: OMG, I am getting bored with this, we hae no influence in what is happening only when supporting the team, which we all did on Saturday, we all want whats best for the club.... End of. So why are you all schoolyard bickering on here, its boring....[/p][/quote]No its not school yard bickering is great and far from boring bt did you know i too my kids Saturdy and there was a steward stood near where we sat and he said that if PDC didnt like the new board he would infact poison them in order to take total control of the club himself and do what he wants when he wants (but remember i dare not tell you which steward) as PDC may have him also bumped off and he wouldnt get in for free again and be able to make up such ludicrous rumours;-) spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

12:26pm Mon 11 Feb 13

avo says...

I agree with Paolo, we (the fans) are fantastic, and that was a magic moment at 3.10pm on Saturday.
.
I wonder if stfc2012 joined in? Or did he stand (by that I mean remain seated, literally) by his OTT comments?
I agree with Paolo, we (the fans) are fantastic, and that was a magic moment at 3.10pm on Saturday. . I wonder if stfc2012 joined in? Or did he stand (by that I mean remain seated, literally) by his OTT comments? avo
  • Score: 0

12:28pm Mon 11 Feb 13

gazza5150 says...

spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
SAPFanSTFC wrote:
London Red wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)
SAP, NO, jobs dont depend on whether you spill the beans on who you claim to have seen in the "MEMBERS LOUNGE" If it was all secretive and cloak and dagger style they wouldnt be in the lounge, normally i like you and your posts but the the longer this whole debracle drags on and the more fans we have in the know but not preparred to share the love is begining to wear a little thin. I feel we have a team that is supported purely by free masons as what they hear and say is all hidden from the real world and stays in the lodge. In a nut shell who did you see in the "lounge" and if it was pure speculation by a third party and your not prepared to keep the rest of us in the loop please dont brag that you know the tea lady, who is waxing the boot boy, whos brother is the managers office cleaner, and is best mates with nick watkins sons football coach younger brother, whom he sits along side at cookery class during school. Sorry if i offended you but were all pi55ed offf with this situation now and some posters dont help other peoples nervous disposition with claims of "I KNOW THIS AND THAT COS SPECULATION MEANS YOU KNOW F$&£ ALL" However if because you are privvy to the members lounge and think it gives you more right to post on our club forum then think again. Cheers
freemasons? didnt they have a chequered past?
[quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SAPFanSTFC[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)[/p][/quote]SAP, NO, jobs dont depend on whether you spill the beans on who you claim to have seen in the "MEMBERS LOUNGE" If it was all secretive and cloak and dagger style they wouldnt be in the lounge, normally i like you and your posts but the the longer this whole debracle drags on and the more fans we have in the know but not preparred to share the love is begining to wear a little thin. I feel we have a team that is supported purely by free masons as what they hear and say is all hidden from the real world and stays in the lodge. In a nut shell who did you see in the "lounge" and if it was pure speculation by a third party and your not prepared to keep the rest of us in the loop please dont brag that you know the tea lady, who is waxing the boot boy, whos brother is the managers office cleaner, and is best mates with nick watkins sons football coach younger brother, whom he sits along side at cookery class during school. Sorry if i offended you but were all pi55ed offf with this situation now and some posters dont help other peoples nervous disposition with claims of "I KNOW THIS AND THAT COS SPECULATION MEANS YOU KNOW F$&£ ALL" However if because you are privvy to the members lounge and think it gives you more right to post on our club forum then think again. Cheers[/p][/quote]freemasons? didnt they have a chequered past? gazza5150
  • Score: 0

12:30pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

Also this morning my postie (& i live in Hampshire) claims PDC will infact take charge of Pompey as he knows the constraints of the clubs finances says the fans are the best in the league and will have them in the prem in 4 seasons.(remember though the postie does the round in Barton but i cant mention who he is for fear of his job)
Also this morning my postie (& i live in Hampshire) claims PDC will infact take charge of Pompey as he knows the constraints of the clubs finances says the fans are the best in the league and will have them in the prem in 4 seasons.(remember though the postie does the round in Barton but i cant mention who he is for fear of his job) spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

12:33pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

gazza5150 wrote:
spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
SAPFanSTFC wrote:
London Red wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)
SAP, NO, jobs dont depend on whether you spill the beans on who you claim to have seen in the "MEMBERS LOUNGE" If it was all secretive and cloak and dagger style they wouldnt be in the lounge, normally i like you and your posts but the the longer this whole debracle drags on and the more fans we have in the know but not preparred to share the love is begining to wear a little thin. I feel we have a team that is supported purely by free masons as what they hear and say is all hidden from the real world and stays in the lodge. In a nut shell who did you see in the "lounge" and if it was pure speculation by a third party and your not prepared to keep the rest of us in the loop please dont brag that you know the tea lady, who is waxing the boot boy, whos brother is the managers office cleaner, and is best mates with nick watkins sons football coach younger brother, whom he sits along side at cookery class during school. Sorry if i offended you but were all pi55ed offf with this situation now and some posters dont help other peoples nervous disposition with claims of "I KNOW THIS AND THAT COS SPECULATION MEANS YOU KNOW F$&£ ALL" However if because you are privvy to the members lounge and think it gives you more right to post on our club forum then think again. Cheers
freemasons? didnt they have a chequered past?
No mate not chequered more like a black gowny cloak thingy but defo not check(especially not Gingham check) Please dont repeat this though or i will be bounced by the lodge for disclosing such issues.
[quote][p][bold]gazza5150[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SAPFanSTFC[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)[/p][/quote]SAP, NO, jobs dont depend on whether you spill the beans on who you claim to have seen in the "MEMBERS LOUNGE" If it was all secretive and cloak and dagger style they wouldnt be in the lounge, normally i like you and your posts but the the longer this whole debracle drags on and the more fans we have in the know but not preparred to share the love is begining to wear a little thin. I feel we have a team that is supported purely by free masons as what they hear and say is all hidden from the real world and stays in the lodge. In a nut shell who did you see in the "lounge" and if it was pure speculation by a third party and your not prepared to keep the rest of us in the loop please dont brag that you know the tea lady, who is waxing the boot boy, whos brother is the managers office cleaner, and is best mates with nick watkins sons football coach younger brother, whom he sits along side at cookery class during school. Sorry if i offended you but were all pi55ed offf with this situation now and some posters dont help other peoples nervous disposition with claims of "I KNOW THIS AND THAT COS SPECULATION MEANS YOU KNOW F$&£ ALL" However if because you are privvy to the members lounge and think it gives you more right to post on our club forum then think again. Cheers[/p][/quote]freemasons? didnt they have a chequered past?[/p][/quote]No mate not chequered more like a black gowny cloak thingy but defo not check(especially not Gingham check) Please dont repeat this though or i will be bounced by the lodge for disclosing such issues. spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

12:36pm Mon 11 Feb 13

avo says...

close the door on your way out.
close the door on your way out. avo
  • Score: 0

12:45pm Mon 11 Feb 13

the wizard says...

I am now convinced that some, not all, post while not having read the main article at least once.
That said, we know how sometimes our manager is careful in the way the chooses his words, and there in the interview above are the keys to how he feels right now,

Quote 1,

for me it is not important because I know they appreciate the job I have done,”

The use of the phrase, the job I HAVE done, not the job I am DOING, uses past tense.

Quote 2,

“I started in management here; that is something amazing. I achieved something important with them. I gave them satisfaction, they gave us big satisfaction.

I achieved something, not I am achieving something

I gave them satisfaction, not I am giving them satisfaction

I stand by the statement. It is exactly the same situation as the day before the Crawley game.”

And that says, the job is still in his eyes untenable.

He has spoken in this tense for a couple of weeks or so and his words are carefully chosen. I have taken hours last week going back over his quotes in weeks and months gone by and his spoken English is all quite clear cut on past/present/future. I also picked up that the whole squad have days off now, something which has hitherto been a bit rare, but explainable as we have a long break, and we have just had three games in a short period.
I WANT HIM TO STAY, but I do think listening and watching him he is at best uneasy with this situation. I don't think he is a quitter, but he is also nobodies fool. As long as this deal goes through, and as long as there is money on the table to allow him some freedom in the market, I think he will stay and do his best to see the job through. For him, second best is not good enough, and its been a very long wait for this club to get someone with that mindset. It would seem 20 goal a season strikers are more easily found than people with his virtues and qualities. The wait hopefully is worthwhile as we have seen plenty of ankers in years gone by. Many rumours and much hear say about Jed, but he is only the front man like Wray, and may be put aside just as easily after a transitional period, who knows. Time to exercise patience, by now we should all be experts at just that.
I am now convinced that some, not all, post while not having read the main article at least once. That said, we know how sometimes our manager is careful in the way the chooses his words, and there in the interview above are the keys to how he feels right now, Quote 1, for me it is not important because I know they appreciate the job I have done,” The use of the phrase, the job I HAVE done, not the job I am DOING, uses past tense. Quote 2, “I started in management here; that is something amazing. I achieved something important with them. I gave them satisfaction, they gave us big satisfaction. I achieved something, not I am achieving something I gave them satisfaction, not I am giving them satisfaction I stand by the statement. It is exactly the same situation as the day before the Crawley game.” And that says, the job is still in his eyes untenable. He has spoken in this tense for a couple of weeks or so and his words are carefully chosen. I have taken hours last week going back over his quotes in weeks and months gone by and his spoken English is all quite clear cut on past/present/future. I also picked up that the whole squad have days off now, something which has hitherto been a bit rare, but explainable as we have a long break, and we have just had three games in a short period. I WANT HIM TO STAY, but I do think listening and watching him he is at best uneasy with this situation. I don't think he is a quitter, but he is also nobodies fool. As long as this deal goes through, and as long as there is money on the table to allow him some freedom in the market, I think he will stay and do his best to see the job through. For him, second best is not good enough, and its been a very long wait for this club to get someone with that mindset. It would seem 20 goal a season strikers are more easily found than people with his virtues and qualities. The wait hopefully is worthwhile as we have seen plenty of ankers in years gone by. Many rumours and much hear say about Jed, but he is only the front man like Wray, and may be put aside just as easily after a transitional period, who knows. Time to exercise patience, by now we should all be experts at just that. the wizard
  • Score: 0

12:46pm Mon 11 Feb 13

League Two second runners up 2006/07 says...

Jesus Christ its like an episode of loose women in here, get over the bickering im sure your all old enough to 'turn the other cheek' so to speak. This is meant to be a forum on our great Swindon Town FC, not an internet school playground.
Jesus Christ its like an episode of loose women in here, get over the bickering im sure your all old enough to 'turn the other cheek' so to speak. This is meant to be a forum on our great Swindon Town FC, not an internet school playground. League Two second runners up 2006/07
  • Score: 0

12:52pm Mon 11 Feb 13

bullyfish says...

afternoon all some of the comments on here i can only assume are not from TRUE swindon fans.....this is what i hope happens, takeover completes this week, pdc stays and we go up as champions. this is what i fear will happen, takeover completes this week, pdc walks in approx 2 weeks, we scrape into the play offs but no promotion. i really hope i am wrong but REMEMBER 1 thing, no 1 person is bigger than STFC, we all make STFC what it is and must stand together as 1 and stop in house fighting and bickering
afternoon all some of the comments on here i can only assume are not from TRUE swindon fans.....this is what i hope happens, takeover completes this week, pdc stays and we go up as champions. this is what i fear will happen, takeover completes this week, pdc walks in approx 2 weeks, we scrape into the play offs but no promotion. i really hope i am wrong but REMEMBER 1 thing, no 1 person is bigger than STFC, we all make STFC what it is and must stand together as 1 and stop in house fighting and bickering bullyfish
  • Score: 0

12:56pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

bullyfish wrote:
afternoon all some of the comments on here i can only assume are not from TRUE swindon fans.....this is what i hope happens, takeover completes this week, pdc stays and we go up as champions. this is what i fear will happen, takeover completes this week, pdc walks in approx 2 weeks, we scrape into the play offs but no promotion. i really hope i am wrong but REMEMBER 1 thing, no 1 person is bigger than STFC, we all make STFC what it is and must stand together as 1 and stop in house fighting and bickering
Totally agree well said
[quote][p][bold]bullyfish[/bold] wrote: afternoon all some of the comments on here i can only assume are not from TRUE swindon fans.....this is what i hope happens, takeover completes this week, pdc stays and we go up as champions. this is what i fear will happen, takeover completes this week, pdc walks in approx 2 weeks, we scrape into the play offs but no promotion. i really hope i am wrong but REMEMBER 1 thing, no 1 person is bigger than STFC, we all make STFC what it is and must stand together as 1 and stop in house fighting and bickering[/p][/quote]Totally agree well said spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

12:59pm Mon 11 Feb 13

the wizard says...

League Two second runners up 2006/07 wrote:
Jesus Christ its like an episode of loose women in here, get over the bickering im sure your all old enough to 'turn the other cheek' so to speak. This is meant to be a forum on our great Swindon Town FC, not an internet school playground.
I quite like Loose Women the show, and some of them are nice and tasty, and it seems quite liberal as well. but then again, I've only been married to my wife for 33 years, but, I've been married to this club for 54 years. my choice and happy with it.
[quote][p][bold]League Two second runners up 2006/07[/bold] wrote: Jesus Christ its like an episode of loose women in here, get over the bickering im sure your all old enough to 'turn the other cheek' so to speak. This is meant to be a forum on our great Swindon Town FC, not an internet school playground.[/p][/quote]I quite like Loose Women the show, and some of them are nice and tasty, and it seems quite liberal as well. but then again, I've only been married to my wife for 33 years, but, I've been married to this club for 54 years. my choice and happy with it. the wizard
  • Score: 0

1:00pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Steve. Brentford says...

I`m scared!!
I`m scared!! Steve. Brentford
  • Score: 0

1:05pm Mon 11 Feb 13

The Jockster says...

multipostingshouldbe
banned
wrote:
London Red wrote:
Will people either put up or shut up!
.
If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments
.
I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category
.
It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
Am posting under a different identity just for this one post so that I don't receive loads of grief.

I have been reading/posting on here for around 12 months, and have come to the conclusion that if SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B were to post under completely new identities, very few people would find their posts worthy of comment.

For the most part they quote/re-quote, copy or even copy and paste each other so often that it is near impossible to find anything original written.

There are only 2 "regular" posters that are worth reading...LR and Wiz because what they have to say is based on fact with opinion.

I should mention that there are many other posters that visit this site that offer very good opinions and have interesting arguments/discussion

s.
I am in no way targetting you.
I am just tired as I am sure others are of hearing the same rubbish spouted by the same few.
What a strange post? Why change a user name for one post- dear oh dear isn't that rather pointless?
Do you seriously expect it to stop people you named from responding?

My take on your view is simple if you don't like mine or certain others posts don't read them. It's not rocket science is it?
Also of course the fact that you have chosen to hide under a nom de plume gives your post no credibility to start with. If you want to stake seriously use your normal log in.

This entire forum exists because its core user base speculate about every topic the Adver puts up for discussion.

When I post about stories that I've heard I generally state that its hearsay but its stated with all good intention as I'm sure the others you have named do also.

No offence but given a choice I'd sooner read one of Grim's (Smirg to you) posts than yours any day. There we go back to personal choice again methinks.
[quote][p][bold]multipostingshouldbe banned[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]Am posting under a different identity just for this one post so that I don't receive loads of grief. I have been reading/posting on here for around 12 months, and have come to the conclusion that if SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B were to post under completely new identities, very few people would find their posts worthy of comment. For the most part they quote/re-quote, copy or even copy and paste each other so often that it is near impossible to find anything original written. There are only 2 "regular" posters that are worth reading...LR and Wiz because what they have to say is based on fact with opinion. I should mention that there are many other posters that visit this site that offer very good opinions and have interesting arguments/discussion s. I am in no way targetting you. I am just tired as I am sure others are of hearing the same rubbish spouted by the same few.[/p][/quote]What a strange post? Why change a user name for one post- dear oh dear isn't that rather pointless? Do you seriously expect it to stop people you named from responding? My take on your view is simple if you don't like mine or certain others posts don't read them. It's not rocket science is it? Also of course the fact that you have chosen to hide under a nom de plume gives your post no credibility to start with. If you want to stake seriously use your normal log in. This entire forum exists because its core user base speculate about every topic the Adver puts up for discussion. When I post about stories that I've heard I generally state that its hearsay but its stated with all good intention as I'm sure the others you have named do also. No offence but given a choice I'd sooner read one of Grim's (Smirg to you) posts than yours any day. There we go back to personal choice again methinks. The Jockster
  • Score: 0

1:13pm Mon 11 Feb 13

jacksdad1 says...

the wizard wrote:
League Two second runners up 2006/07 wrote: Jesus Christ its like an episode of loose women in here, get over the bickering im sure your all old enough to 'turn the other cheek' so to speak. This is meant to be a forum on our great Swindon Town FC, not an internet school playground.
I quite like Loose Women the show, and some of them are nice and tasty, and it seems quite liberal as well. but then again, I've only been married to my wife for 33 years, but, I've been married to this club for 54 years. my choice and happy with it.
I just like loose women.......COYR
[quote][p][bold]the wizard[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]League Two second runners up 2006/07[/bold] wrote: Jesus Christ its like an episode of loose women in here, get over the bickering im sure your all old enough to 'turn the other cheek' so to speak. This is meant to be a forum on our great Swindon Town FC, not an internet school playground.[/p][/quote]I quite like Loose Women the show, and some of them are nice and tasty, and it seems quite liberal as well. but then again, I've only been married to my wife for 33 years, but, I've been married to this club for 54 years. my choice and happy with it.[/p][/quote]I just like loose women.......COYR jacksdad1
  • Score: 0

1:15pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Davidsyrett says...

Just heard a rumour and been confirmed by a reliable source, can't name names but but he goes under the alias of God. PdC to be the next Pope! Explains all!
Just heard a rumour and been confirmed by a reliable source, can't name names but but he goes under the alias of God. PdC to be the next Pope! Explains all! Davidsyrett
  • Score: 0

1:16pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Carlo says...

Highworth red wrote:
It feels like we are a ship on the ocean in a storm with no engines. As for Paolo, I have always been a supporter, but I've had enough now. If he doesn't want to commit and isn't happy, then go and let somebody else have a crack. We have a decent squad and any half decent manager could get results with them. I can assure you there wouldn't be a shortage of applications for the job.
I think you are missing Paolo's point.

He has just had his best player sold without his knowledge. He cannot (and I wouldn't) work like this. He is correct to make his stance for the benefit of the team, otherwise there is nothing stopping them doing the same again.

This is Paolo's best opportunity to make this stand and test the board, to see if they will back him and allow him to recruit the loan players he wants
[quote][p][bold]Highworth red[/bold] wrote: It feels like we are a ship on the ocean in a storm with no engines. As for Paolo, I have always been a supporter, but I've had enough now. If he doesn't want to commit and isn't happy, then go and let somebody else have a crack. We have a decent squad and any half decent manager could get results with them. I can assure you there wouldn't be a shortage of applications for the job.[/p][/quote]I think you are missing Paolo's point. He has just had his best player sold without his knowledge. He cannot (and I wouldn't) work like this. He is correct to make his stance for the benefit of the team, otherwise there is nothing stopping them doing the same again. This is Paolo's best opportunity to make this stand and test the board, to see if they will back him and allow him to recruit the loan players he wants Carlo
  • Score: 0

1:17pm Mon 11 Feb 13

The Jockster says...

Oops typo should read "be taken seriously"
Oops typo should read "be taken seriously" The Jockster
  • Score: 0

1:17pm Mon 11 Feb 13

the don69 says...

Steve. Brentford wrote:
I`m scared!!
Ask Mummy to leave the light on when you go to sleep tonight Steve!LOL!!!!!!!!
[quote][p][bold]Steve. Brentford[/bold] wrote: I`m scared!![/p][/quote]Ask Mummy to leave the light on when you go to sleep tonight Steve!LOL!!!!!!!! the don69
  • Score: 0

1:22pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Pewsham Red says...

Wilesy wrote:
multipostingshouldbe

banned
wrote:
London Red wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
Am posting under a different identity just for this one post so that I don't receive loads of grief. I have been reading/posting on here for around 12 months, and have come to the conclusion that if SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B were to post under completely new identities, very few people would find their posts worthy of comment. For the most part they quote/re-quote, copy or even copy and paste each other so often that it is near impossible to find anything original written. There are only 2 "regular" posters that are worth reading...LR and Wiz because what they have to say is based on fact with opinion. I should mention that there are many other posters that visit this site that offer very good opinions and have interesting arguments/discussion s. I am in no way targetting you. I am just tired as I am sure others are of hearing the same rubbish spouted by the same few.
I disagree completely I find the football related views and opinions of SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B (as well as Wiz, LR and most other posters) very interesting.

In an ideal world the couple of seemingly never-ending feuds could be finished or taken off-line, but apart from that all good stuff, and highly unfair to say these posters are spouting rubbish.

In the meantime I will try and make my posts more factual and interesting and seek to gain your approval :-)
Agreed Wilesy. We all have a different style and LR in particular can go on a bit and be a bit of a 'statto'.

But he is a decent contributor, as are the others and whilst we may not agree with everything they say, they are generally a good read.

The bickering can get tedious but I think you'd get that on any forum and most of the posters above don't resort to swearing and name calling (unlike me!)

To be fair, I have detected an increased tetchiness on this site over the last few weeks, for obvious reasons but I suspect that once the deal completes this will die down.
[quote][p][bold]Wilesy[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]multipostingshouldbe banned[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]Am posting under a different identity just for this one post so that I don't receive loads of grief. I have been reading/posting on here for around 12 months, and have come to the conclusion that if SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B were to post under completely new identities, very few people would find their posts worthy of comment. For the most part they quote/re-quote, copy or even copy and paste each other so often that it is near impossible to find anything original written. There are only 2 "regular" posters that are worth reading...LR and Wiz because what they have to say is based on fact with opinion. I should mention that there are many other posters that visit this site that offer very good opinions and have interesting arguments/discussion s. I am in no way targetting you. I am just tired as I am sure others are of hearing the same rubbish spouted by the same few.[/p][/quote]I disagree completely I find the football related views and opinions of SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B (as well as Wiz, LR and most other posters) very interesting. In an ideal world the couple of seemingly never-ending feuds could be finished or taken off-line, but apart from that all good stuff, and highly unfair to say these posters are spouting rubbish. In the meantime I will try and make my posts more factual and interesting and seek to gain your approval :-)[/p][/quote]Agreed Wilesy. We all have a different style and LR in particular can go on a bit and be a bit of a 'statto'. But he is a decent contributor, as are the others and whilst we may not agree with everything they say, they are generally a good read. The bickering can get tedious but I think you'd get that on any forum and most of the posters above don't resort to swearing and name calling (unlike me!) To be fair, I have detected an increased tetchiness on this site over the last few weeks, for obvious reasons but I suspect that once the deal completes this will die down. Pewsham Red
  • Score: 0

1:26pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Steve. Brentford says...

Steve. Brentford wrote:
I`m scared!!
"to post my real thoughts under my own user-name so i will offend all but two posters on here under a different name and then post under my own name so no one i have a debate with in the future will know what i think of there opinions" Get a back-bone and speak up or shut up.
To much sh*t stirring on here and not much respect to and from our own fans,add to that the scaremongering and over reactions it all getting a bit too much,over 5 yrs i have posted on here,i have made some new mates become reacquainted with old friends and learnt that others are as caring of STFC as i am, i have fallen out with a few over certain things but never held grudges and regularly debate,banter or agree and disagree with those same posters,we are Swindon fans that's what we have in common and that is why come on this site people need to chill out a little and have some patience.
LR is someone i have had lively debates(arguments) with in the past although ninety per cent of the time i agree with him and i make him right with regards to the scaremongering put up or shut up.


I feel better now!
[quote][p][bold]Steve. Brentford[/bold] wrote: I`m scared!![/p][/quote]"to post my real thoughts under my own user-name so i will offend all but two posters on here under a different name and then post under my own name so no one i have a debate with in the future will know what i think of there opinions" Get a back-bone and speak up or shut up. To much sh*t stirring on here and not much respect to and from our own fans,add to that the scaremongering and over reactions it all getting a bit too much,over 5 yrs i have posted on here,i have made some new mates become reacquainted with old friends and learnt that others are as caring of STFC as i am, i have fallen out with a few over certain things but never held grudges and regularly debate,banter or agree and disagree with those same posters,we are Swindon fans that's what we have in common and that is why come on this site people need to chill out a little and have some patience. LR is someone i have had lively debates(arguments) with in the past although ninety per cent of the time i agree with him and i make him right with regards to the scaremongering put up or shut up. I feel better now! Steve. Brentford
  • Score: 0

1:27pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

Davidsyrett wrote:
Just heard a rumour and been confirmed by a reliable source, can't name names but but he goes under the alias of God. PdC to be the next Pope! Explains all!
Also heard that one but thought i bettter not spread anymore shat
[quote][p][bold]Davidsyrett[/bold] wrote: Just heard a rumour and been confirmed by a reliable source, can't name names but but he goes under the alias of God. PdC to be the next Pope! Explains all![/p][/quote]Also heard that one but thought i bettter not spread anymore shat spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

1:29pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Tomcat 1944 says...

All we know for certain is that Jed Mc and co have agreed a deal with Andrew Black to buy control of the club. This needs to be ratified by the FL which hopefully will happen soon. Apart from that all the rest is supposition, Chinese whispers, rumours etc no concrete information whatsoever has been divulged - so why don't we be patient just a while longer until the FL announce their findings. I also wonder if the meeting between PDC and Jed Mc and co was a 'getting to know you meeting' rather than a conversation of substance, would account for PDC's ongoing attitude don't you think.
All we know for certain is that Jed Mc and co have agreed a deal with Andrew Black to buy control of the club. This needs to be ratified by the FL which hopefully will happen soon. Apart from that all the rest is supposition, Chinese whispers, rumours etc no concrete information whatsoever has been divulged - so why don't we be patient just a while longer until the FL announce their findings. I also wonder if the meeting between PDC and Jed Mc and co was a 'getting to know you meeting' rather than a conversation of substance, would account for PDC's ongoing attitude don't you think. Tomcat 1944
  • Score: 0

1:31pm Mon 11 Feb 13

RamsburyRed says...

Two themes have emerged that I disagree with; firstly the angst over the incoming owners, and secondly the assertion that Paolo should 'make his mind up'.
*
As regards the new owners, well none of us know so why are so many determined to wallow in misery? Crikey, some of you guys are going to make yourselves ill with worry. All we can do is wait for FL ratification and see the shape of the new Board. I for one am not going to worry about them until then. The only thing we should really fear is if the takeover does not go ahead, because then we'll be in Admin.
*
And why should Paolo make any decision until the new owners are in place? He has said he is a professional (and no-one can doubt that) and is getting on with the job. That should do for us. When the new owners are in and can set out the future, then is time for PDC to decide.
Two themes have emerged that I disagree with; firstly the angst over the incoming owners, and secondly the assertion that Paolo should 'make his mind up'. * As regards the new owners, well none of us know so why are so many determined to wallow in misery? Crikey, some of you guys are going to make yourselves ill with worry. All we can do is wait for FL ratification and see the shape of the new Board. I for one am not going to worry about them until then. The only thing we should really fear is if the takeover does not go ahead, because then we'll be in Admin. * And why should Paolo make any decision until the new owners are in place? He has said he is a professional (and no-one can doubt that) and is getting on with the job. That should do for us. When the new owners are in and can set out the future, then is time for PDC to decide. RamsburyRed
  • Score: 0

1:34pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Stratton Red says...

My biggest concern is the missed opportunity of not sitting pretty on top of league today...
*
Would a manager really walk away from a team that's top of the league despite adversity??? What fottball excuse would he have??? The failure to beat (a somewhat rejuvinated) bottom of the league team is ammunition that should not have been given.
My biggest concern is the missed opportunity of not sitting pretty on top of league today... * Would a manager really walk away from a team that's top of the league despite adversity??? What fottball excuse would he have??? The failure to beat (a somewhat rejuvinated) bottom of the league team is ammunition that should not have been given. Stratton Red
  • Score: 0

1:38pm Mon 11 Feb 13

buckobassettboy says...

I have previously commented on the adverse history of my beloved team but in case you have missed the point it has always been a badly run club.Do we really believe that this new lot are going to be any different?Er-no.
I have previously commented on the adverse history of my beloved team but in case you have missed the point it has always been a badly run club.Do we really believe that this new lot are going to be any different?Er-no. buckobassettboy
  • Score: 0

1:38pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Oi Den! says...

the wizard wrote:
I am now convinced that some, not all, post while not having read the main article at least once.
That said, we know how sometimes our manager is careful in the way the chooses his words, and there in the interview above are the keys to how he feels right now,

Quote 1,

for me it is not important because I know they appreciate the job I have done,”

The use of the phrase, the job I HAVE done, not the job I am DOING, uses past tense.

Quote 2,

“I started in management here; that is something amazing. I achieved something important with them. I gave them satisfaction, they gave us big satisfaction.

I achieved something, not I am achieving something

I gave them satisfaction, not I am giving them satisfaction

I stand by the statement. It is exactly the same situation as the day before the Crawley game.”

And that says, the job is still in his eyes untenable.

He has spoken in this tense for a couple of weeks or so and his words are carefully chosen. I have taken hours last week going back over his quotes in weeks and months gone by and his spoken English is all quite clear cut on past/present/future. I also picked up that the whole squad have days off now, something which has hitherto been a bit rare, but explainable as we have a long break, and we have just had three games in a short period.
I WANT HIM TO STAY, but I do think listening and watching him he is at best uneasy with this situation. I don't think he is a quitter, but he is also nobodies fool. As long as this deal goes through, and as long as there is money on the table to allow him some freedom in the market, I think he will stay and do his best to see the job through. For him, second best is not good enough, and its been a very long wait for this club to get someone with that mindset. It would seem 20 goal a season strikers are more easily found than people with his virtues and qualities. The wait hopefully is worthwhile as we have seen plenty of ankers in years gone by. Many rumours and much hear say about Jed, but he is only the front man like Wray, and may be put aside just as easily after a transitional period, who knows. Time to exercise patience, by now we should all be experts at just that.
Wiz, he does indeed choose his words carefully, and I think far less is lost in translation than some would have us believe. I don't reckon his use of the past tense is for any other purpose than to maximise dramatic effect. One thing PDC has learnt very fast is how to use the the media as a way of exerting pressure.
.
A more charitable interpretation could be that he's simply got his tenses slightly muddled. If he had said "I have given them", "I have achieved" etc, the whole tone would have been less "final".
[quote][p][bold]the wizard[/bold] wrote: I am now convinced that some, not all, post while not having read the main article at least once. That said, we know how sometimes our manager is careful in the way the chooses his words, and there in the interview above are the keys to how he feels right now, Quote 1, for me it is not important because I know they appreciate the job I have done,” The use of the phrase, the job I HAVE done, not the job I am DOING, uses past tense. Quote 2, “I started in management here; that is something amazing. I achieved something important with them. I gave them satisfaction, they gave us big satisfaction. I achieved something, not I am achieving something I gave them satisfaction, not I am giving them satisfaction I stand by the statement. It is exactly the same situation as the day before the Crawley game.” And that says, the job is still in his eyes untenable. He has spoken in this tense for a couple of weeks or so and his words are carefully chosen. I have taken hours last week going back over his quotes in weeks and months gone by and his spoken English is all quite clear cut on past/present/future. I also picked up that the whole squad have days off now, something which has hitherto been a bit rare, but explainable as we have a long break, and we have just had three games in a short period. I WANT HIM TO STAY, but I do think listening and watching him he is at best uneasy with this situation. I don't think he is a quitter, but he is also nobodies fool. As long as this deal goes through, and as long as there is money on the table to allow him some freedom in the market, I think he will stay and do his best to see the job through. For him, second best is not good enough, and its been a very long wait for this club to get someone with that mindset. It would seem 20 goal a season strikers are more easily found than people with his virtues and qualities. The wait hopefully is worthwhile as we have seen plenty of ankers in years gone by. Many rumours and much hear say about Jed, but he is only the front man like Wray, and may be put aside just as easily after a transitional period, who knows. Time to exercise patience, by now we should all be experts at just that.[/p][/quote]Wiz, he does indeed choose his words carefully, and I think far less is lost in translation than some would have us believe. I don't reckon his use of the past tense is for any other purpose than to maximise dramatic effect. One thing PDC has learnt very fast is how to use the the media as a way of exerting pressure. . A more charitable interpretation could be that he's simply got his tenses slightly muddled. If he had said "I have given them", "I have achieved" etc, the whole tone would have been less "final". Oi Den!
  • Score: 0

1:44pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Grimly Feendish says...

Paolo discussing personal details for new job with the Vatican.
Paolo discussing personal details for new job with the Vatican. Grimly Feendish
  • Score: 0

1:55pm Mon 11 Feb 13

RamsburyRed says...

Paolo for Pope is probably closer to the mark than most rumours on here. Wonder what league the Vatican is in - the Celestial League?
*
Wait for Guv to come on and give us the full details.
Paolo for Pope is probably closer to the mark than most rumours on here. Wonder what league the Vatican is in - the Celestial League? * Wait for Guv to come on and give us the full details. RamsburyRed
  • Score: 0

2:00pm Mon 11 Feb 13

MITTED says...

Paolo for Pope? He is already a god, why would he step down a level? :o)

COYR
Paolo for Pope? He is already a god, why would he step down a level? :o) COYR MITTED
  • Score: 0

2:01pm Mon 11 Feb 13

MITTED says...

Paolo for Pope? He is already a god, why would he step down a level? :o)

COYR
Paolo for Pope? He is already a god, why would he step down a level? :o) COYR MITTED
  • Score: 0

2:09pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Davidsyrett says...

MITTED wrote:
Paolo for Pope? He is already a god, why would he step down a level? :o)

COYR
Better pay
[quote][p][bold]MITTED[/bold] wrote: Paolo for Pope? He is already a god, why would he step down a level? :o) COYR[/p][/quote]Better pay Davidsyrett
  • Score: 0

2:26pm Mon 11 Feb 13

The Jockster says...

the wizard wrote:
League Two second runners up 2006/07 wrote:
Jesus Christ its like an episode of loose women in here, get over the bickering im sure your all old enough to 'turn the other cheek' so to speak. This is meant to be a forum on our great Swindon Town FC, not an internet school playground.
I quite like Loose Women the show, and some of them are nice and tasty, and it seems quite liberal as well. but then again, I've only been married to my wife for 33 years, but, I've been married to this club for 54 years. my choice and happy with it.
Wizzler hope you're well nearly put in a call to Hogwarts :) now pray tell which loose women tickle the old fancy then lol? I confess to having a bit of a thing for Alison Steadman ever since Abigail's party & nuts in may also the oxo lady but the jock bird carol somebody, the weather girl & the blonde bimbo Denise "let it all hang down " welch leave me cold. Just thought we needed some light relief from the black cloud over the CG :(
[quote][p][bold]the wizard[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]League Two second runners up 2006/07[/bold] wrote: Jesus Christ its like an episode of loose women in here, get over the bickering im sure your all old enough to 'turn the other cheek' so to speak. This is meant to be a forum on our great Swindon Town FC, not an internet school playground.[/p][/quote]I quite like Loose Women the show, and some of them are nice and tasty, and it seems quite liberal as well. but then again, I've only been married to my wife for 33 years, but, I've been married to this club for 54 years. my choice and happy with it.[/p][/quote]Wizzler hope you're well nearly put in a call to Hogwarts :) now pray tell which loose women tickle the old fancy then lol? I confess to having a bit of a thing for Alison Steadman ever since Abigail's party & nuts in may also the oxo lady but the jock bird carol somebody, the weather girl & the blonde bimbo Denise "let it all hang down " welch leave me cold. Just thought we needed some light relief from the black cloud over the CG :( The Jockster
  • Score: 0

2:31pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Wilesy says...

RamsburyRed wrote:
Two themes have emerged that I disagree with; firstly the angst over the incoming owners, and secondly the assertion that Paolo should 'make his mind up'. * As regards the new owners, well none of us know so why are so many determined to wallow in misery? Crikey, some of you guys are going to make yourselves ill with worry. All we can do is wait for FL ratification and see the shape of the new Board. I for one am not going to worry about them until then. The only thing we should really fear is if the takeover does not go ahead, because then we'll be in Admin. * And why should Paolo make any decision until the new owners are in place? He has said he is a professional (and no-one can doubt that) and is getting on with the job. That should do for us. When the new owners are in and can set out the future, then is time for PDC to decide.
The concern is that it is almost 2 weeks since the loan players got blocked and Paolo's untenable statement was issued, during that time there has been discussion between Paolo and the new people. Everyone is wondering 'how did it go?', and then he comes out after the game on Saturday and says the situation is just as untenable as before, speaks in the past tense and waves at the fans. It doesn't look good.

Just because the FL ratification is dragging on doesn't mean nothing is going on at the club in the meantime.

I don't see why Paolo couldn't say that he has met with the new owners and is happy with what he has heard and will stay if it all goes through. The fact he is evading any attempt to discuss it sends out a bad signal.

Because of what people are seeing and hearing from the manager, it is leading to negative conjecture (and some wallowing in misery) If it is simply mind games between Paolo and the board, then the fans are caught in the middle and I don't think that is fair.
[quote][p][bold]RamsburyRed[/bold] wrote: Two themes have emerged that I disagree with; firstly the angst over the incoming owners, and secondly the assertion that Paolo should 'make his mind up'. * As regards the new owners, well none of us know so why are so many determined to wallow in misery? Crikey, some of you guys are going to make yourselves ill with worry. All we can do is wait for FL ratification and see the shape of the new Board. I for one am not going to worry about them until then. The only thing we should really fear is if the takeover does not go ahead, because then we'll be in Admin. * And why should Paolo make any decision until the new owners are in place? He has said he is a professional (and no-one can doubt that) and is getting on with the job. That should do for us. When the new owners are in and can set out the future, then is time for PDC to decide.[/p][/quote]The concern is that it is almost 2 weeks since the loan players got blocked and Paolo's untenable statement was issued, during that time there has been discussion between Paolo and the new people. Everyone is wondering 'how did it go?', and then he comes out after the game on Saturday and says the situation is just as untenable as before, speaks in the past tense and waves at the fans. It doesn't look good. Just because the FL ratification is dragging on doesn't mean nothing is going on at the club in the meantime. I don't see why Paolo couldn't say that he has met with the new owners and is happy with what he has heard and will stay if it all goes through. The fact he is evading any attempt to discuss it sends out a bad signal. Because of what people are seeing and hearing from the manager, it is leading to negative conjecture (and some wallowing in misery) If it is simply mind games between Paolo and the board, then the fans are caught in the middle and I don't think that is fair. Wilesy
  • Score: 0

2:40pm Mon 11 Feb 13

stfc2012 says...

avo wrote:
I agree with Paolo, we (the fans) are fantastic, and that was a magic moment at 3.10pm on Saturday.
.
I wonder if stfc2012 joined in? Or did he stand (by that I mean remain seated, literally) by his OTT comments?
OTT comments? Ha! Oh how some don't like a difference of opinion. It matters not whether I stand or sit. I did think it was a good effort by the fans although still over the top ego massaging. In return the manager answered nothing about his future but did decide to wave at the end to keep you all on your toes and cause more uncertainty. It's nice you wonder about what I'm doing though. Good effort from the fans but won't make any difference in the long term.
[quote][p][bold]avo[/bold] wrote: I agree with Paolo, we (the fans) are fantastic, and that was a magic moment at 3.10pm on Saturday. . I wonder if stfc2012 joined in? Or did he stand (by that I mean remain seated, literally) by his OTT comments?[/p][/quote]OTT comments? Ha! Oh how some don't like a difference of opinion. It matters not whether I stand or sit. I did think it was a good effort by the fans although still over the top ego massaging. In return the manager answered nothing about his future but did decide to wave at the end to keep you all on your toes and cause more uncertainty. It's nice you wonder about what I'm doing though. Good effort from the fans but won't make any difference in the long term. stfc2012
  • Score: 0

2:40pm Mon 11 Feb 13

the wizard says...

The Jockster wrote:
the wizard wrote:
League Two second runners up 2006/07 wrote:
Jesus Christ its like an episode of loose women in here, get over the bickering im sure your all old enough to 'turn the other cheek' so to speak. This is meant to be a forum on our great Swindon Town FC, not an internet school playground.
I quite like Loose Women the show, and some of them are nice and tasty, and it seems quite liberal as well. but then again, I've only been married to my wife for 33 years, but, I've been married to this club for 54 years. my choice and happy with it.
Wizzler hope you're well nearly put in a call to Hogwarts :) now pray tell which loose women tickle the old fancy then lol? I confess to having a bit of a thing for Alison Steadman ever since Abigail's party & nuts in may also the oxo lady but the jock bird carol somebody, the weather girl & the blonde bimbo Denise "let it all hang down " welch leave me cold. Just thought we needed some light relief from the black cloud over the CG :(
LOL ! as Steptoe said to his old chap,

"You dirty old man", sorry couldn't resist.

My list, well I'd be posting till midnight. We are spoilt just by some of the girls at ITN let alone some of the soaps if you look carefully. The world is indeed full of lovely ladies, and don't forget a gentleman never asks a lady her age.
[quote][p][bold]The Jockster[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]the wizard[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]League Two second runners up 2006/07[/bold] wrote: Jesus Christ its like an episode of loose women in here, get over the bickering im sure your all old enough to 'turn the other cheek' so to speak. This is meant to be a forum on our great Swindon Town FC, not an internet school playground.[/p][/quote]I quite like Loose Women the show, and some of them are nice and tasty, and it seems quite liberal as well. but then again, I've only been married to my wife for 33 years, but, I've been married to this club for 54 years. my choice and happy with it.[/p][/quote]Wizzler hope you're well nearly put in a call to Hogwarts :) now pray tell which loose women tickle the old fancy then lol? I confess to having a bit of a thing for Alison Steadman ever since Abigail's party & nuts in may also the oxo lady but the jock bird carol somebody, the weather girl & the blonde bimbo Denise "let it all hang down " welch leave me cold. Just thought we needed some light relief from the black cloud over the CG :([/p][/quote]LOL ! as Steptoe said to his old chap, "You dirty old man", sorry couldn't resist. My list, well I'd be posting till midnight. We are spoilt just by some of the girls at ITN let alone some of the soaps if you look carefully. The world is indeed full of lovely ladies, and don't forget a gentleman never asks a lady her age. the wizard
  • Score: 0

2:51pm Mon 11 Feb 13

smirg kcab says...

multipostingshouldbe
banned
wrote:
London Red wrote:
Will people either put up or shut up!
.
If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments
.
I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category
.
It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
Am posting under a different identity just for this one post so that I don't receive loads of grief.

I have been reading/posting on here for around 12 months, and have come to the conclusion that if SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B were to post under completely new identities, very few people would find their posts worthy of comment.

For the most part they quote/re-quote, copy or even copy and paste each other so often that it is near impossible to find anything original written.

There are only 2 "regular" posters that are worth reading...LR and Wiz because what they have to say is based on fact with opinion.

I should mention that there are many other posters that visit this site that offer very good opinions and have interesting arguments/discussion

s.
I am in no way targetting you.
I am just tired as I am sure others are of hearing the same rubbish spouted by the same few.
What a Complete bell end
Freedom of speech is not your forte.
Get a life mr bell
As for a different I'd just shows you what an absolute priick you sound.
Onwards and upwards
Hope you look forward to my next post maybe about a donkey maybe not?
If its good enough for Pdc it's good enough for me.
Or perhaps you may be someone who's linked to this site?
[quote][p][bold]multipostingshouldbe banned[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]Am posting under a different identity just for this one post so that I don't receive loads of grief. I have been reading/posting on here for around 12 months, and have come to the conclusion that if SAP, Den, Jock, Smirg and Joey B were to post under completely new identities, very few people would find their posts worthy of comment. For the most part they quote/re-quote, copy or even copy and paste each other so often that it is near impossible to find anything original written. There are only 2 "regular" posters that are worth reading...LR and Wiz because what they have to say is based on fact with opinion. I should mention that there are many other posters that visit this site that offer very good opinions and have interesting arguments/discussion s. I am in no way targetting you. I am just tired as I am sure others are of hearing the same rubbish spouted by the same few.[/p][/quote]What a Complete bell end Freedom of speech is not your forte. Get a life mr bell As for a different I'd just shows you what an absolute priick you sound. Onwards and upwards Hope you look forward to my next post maybe about a donkey maybe not? If its good enough for Pdc it's good enough for me. Or perhaps you may be someone who's linked to this site? smirg kcab
  • Score: 0

3:06pm Mon 11 Feb 13

VinnyPericard says...

The new buyers would be bonkers to push Di Canio out when you look at our position in the league.

I'm sure they're not planning to though. Other than off the field, the club has never looked so good!
The new buyers would be bonkers to push Di Canio out when you look at our position in the league. I'm sure they're not planning to though. Other than off the field, the club has never looked so good! VinnyPericard
  • Score: 0

3:12pm Mon 11 Feb 13

The Jockster says...

the wizard wrote:
The Jockster wrote:
the wizard wrote:
League Two second runners up 2006/07 wrote:
Jesus Christ its like an episode of loose women in here, get over the bickering im sure your all old enough to 'turn the other cheek' so to speak. This is meant to be a forum on our great Swindon Town FC, not an internet school playground.
I quite like Loose Women the show, and some of them are nice and tasty, and it seems quite liberal as well. but then again, I've only been married to my wife for 33 years, but, I've been married to this club for 54 years. my choice and happy with it.
Wizzler hope you're well nearly put in a call to Hogwarts :) now pray tell which loose women tickle the old fancy then lol? I confess to having a bit of a thing for Alison Steadman ever since Abigail's party & nuts in may also the oxo lady but the jock bird carol somebody, the weather girl & the blonde bimbo Denise "let it all hang down " welch leave me cold. Just thought we needed some light relief from the black cloud over the CG :(
LOL ! as Steptoe said to his old chap,

"You dirty old man", sorry couldn't resist.

My list, well I'd be posting till midnight. We are spoilt just by some of the girls at ITN let alone some of the soaps if you look carefully. The world is indeed full of lovely ladies, and don't forget a gentleman never asks a lady her age.
So then all we've concluded is that I'm Steptoe's dad and you like to perv after the itv young ladies lol - there are a few tasty ladies on the beeb too:) lol. Susannah Reid does it for me as does Gabby Logan but not hazel Irvine or sue barker lol!
[quote][p][bold]the wizard[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]The Jockster[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]the wizard[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]League Two second runners up 2006/07[/bold] wrote: Jesus Christ its like an episode of loose women in here, get over the bickering im sure your all old enough to 'turn the other cheek' so to speak. This is meant to be a forum on our great Swindon Town FC, not an internet school playground.[/p][/quote]I quite like Loose Women the show, and some of them are nice and tasty, and it seems quite liberal as well. but then again, I've only been married to my wife for 33 years, but, I've been married to this club for 54 years. my choice and happy with it.[/p][/quote]Wizzler hope you're well nearly put in a call to Hogwarts :) now pray tell which loose women tickle the old fancy then lol? I confess to having a bit of a thing for Alison Steadman ever since Abigail's party & nuts in may also the oxo lady but the jock bird carol somebody, the weather girl & the blonde bimbo Denise "let it all hang down " welch leave me cold. Just thought we needed some light relief from the black cloud over the CG :([/p][/quote]LOL ! as Steptoe said to his old chap, "You dirty old man", sorry couldn't resist. My list, well I'd be posting till midnight. We are spoilt just by some of the girls at ITN let alone some of the soaps if you look carefully. The world is indeed full of lovely ladies, and don't forget a gentleman never asks a lady her age.[/p][/quote]So then all we've concluded is that I'm Steptoe's dad and you like to perv after the itv young ladies lol - there are a few tasty ladies on the beeb too:) lol. Susannah Reid does it for me as does Gabby Logan but not hazel Irvine or sue barker lol! The Jockster
  • Score: 0

3:12pm Mon 11 Feb 13

the wizard says...

Calling The Jockster, and everyone else.

ENJOY,




I DIDN'T BELIEVE THESE LAWS AT FIRST, BUT HAVE FOUND
THEM TO BE TRUE FROM ACTUAL EXPERIENCE.


1.Law of Mechanical Repair - After your hands become coated with grease, your nose will begin to itch and you'll have to pee.

2.Law of Gravity - Any tool, nut, bolt, screw, when dropped, will roll to the least accessible corner.

3. Law of Probability- The probability of being watched is directly proportional to the stupidity of your act.

4.Law of Random Numbers - If you dial a wrong number, you never get a busy signal and someone always answers.

5.Supermarket Law - As soon as you get in the smallest line, the cashier will have to call for help.

6.Variation Law -If you change lines (or traffic lanes), the one you were in will always move faster than the one you are in now.



7.Law of the Bath - When the body is fully immersed in water, the telephone rings.

8. Law of Close Encounters - The probability of meeting someone you know increases dramatically when you are with someone you don't want to be seen with.

9. Law of the Result - When you try to prove to someone that a machine won't work, it will.

10. Law of Biomechanics - The severity of the itch is inversely proportional to the reach.

11.. Law of the Theater & Hockey Arena - At any event, the people whose seats are furthest from the aisle, always arrive last. They are the ones who will leave their seats several times to go for food, beer, or the toilet and who leave early before the end of the performance or the game is over. The folks in the aisle seats come early, never move once, have long gangly legs or big bellies and stay to the bitter end of the performance. The aisle people also are very surly folk.

12. The Coffee Law - As soon as you sit down to a cup of hot coffee, your boss will ask you to do something which will last until the coffee is cold.

13. Murphy's Law of Lockers - If there are only 2 people in a locker room, they will have adjacent lockers.

14. Law of Physical Surfaces - The chances of an open-faced jam sandwich landing face down on a floor, are directly correlated to the newness and cost of the carpet or rug.

15.Law of Logical Argument-Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

16. Brown's Law of Physical Appearance - If the clothes fit, they're ugly.

17.Oliver's Law of Public Speaking- A closed mouth gathers no feet.

18.Wilson's Law of Commercial Marketing Strategy -As soon as you find a product that you really like, they will stop making it.

19. Doctors' Law- If you don't feel well, make an appointment to go to the doctor, by the time you get there you'll feel better... But don't make an appointment, and you'll stay sick. This has been proven over and over with taking children to the pediatrician.



If you don't believe this, your belly button will unscrew and your bum will fall off.
Calling The Jockster, and everyone else. ENJOY, I DIDN'T BELIEVE THESE LAWS AT FIRST, BUT HAVE FOUND THEM TO BE TRUE FROM ACTUAL EXPERIENCE. 1.Law of Mechanical Repair - After your hands become coated with grease, your nose will begin to itch and you'll have to pee. 2.Law of Gravity - Any tool, nut, bolt, screw, when dropped, will roll to the least accessible corner. 3. Law of Probability- The probability of being watched is directly proportional to the stupidity of your act. 4.Law of Random Numbers - If you dial a wrong number, you never get a busy signal and someone always answers. 5.Supermarket Law - As soon as you get in the smallest line, the cashier will have to call for help. 6.Variation Law -If you change lines (or traffic lanes), the one you were in will always move faster than the one you are in now. 7.Law of the Bath - When the body is fully immersed in water, the telephone rings. 8. Law of Close Encounters - The probability of meeting someone you know increases dramatically when you are with someone you don't want to be seen with. 9. Law of the Result - When you try to prove to someone that a machine won't work, it will. 10. Law of Biomechanics - The severity of the itch is inversely proportional to the reach. 11.. Law of the Theater & Hockey Arena - At any event, the people whose seats are furthest from the aisle, always arrive last. They are the ones who will leave their seats several times to go for food, beer, or the toilet and who leave early before the end of the performance or the game is over. The folks in the aisle seats come early, never move once, have long gangly legs or big bellies and stay to the bitter end of the performance. The aisle people also are very surly folk. 12. The Coffee Law - As soon as you sit down to a cup of hot coffee, your boss will ask you to do something which will last until the coffee is cold. 13. Murphy's Law of Lockers - If there are only 2 people in a locker room, they will have adjacent lockers. 14. Law of Physical Surfaces - The chances of an open-faced jam sandwich landing face down on a floor, are directly correlated to the newness and cost of the carpet or rug. 15.Law of Logical Argument-Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about. 16. Brown's Law of Physical Appearance - If the clothes fit, they're ugly. 17.Oliver's Law of Public Speaking- A closed mouth gathers no feet. 18.Wilson's Law of Commercial Marketing Strategy -As soon as you find a product that you really like, they will stop making it. 19. Doctors' Law- If you don't feel well, make an appointment to go to the doctor, by the time you get there you'll feel better... But don't make an appointment, and you'll stay sick. This has been proven over and over with taking children to the pediatrician. If you don't believe this, your belly button will unscrew and your bum will fall off. the wizard
  • Score: 0

3:14pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Lone Wolf says...

I suspected all along that PdC was in league with the Vatican. It's the hat. Anyway, he can walk on water as far as I'm concerned. I've never had more entertainment supporting STFC than watching your man in the dugout. We won't forget him in a hurry no matter what the outcome is!
I suspected all along that PdC was in league with the Vatican. It's the hat. Anyway, he can walk on water as far as I'm concerned. I've never had more entertainment supporting STFC than watching your man in the dugout. We won't forget him in a hurry no matter what the outcome is! Lone Wolf
  • Score: 0

3:21pm Mon 11 Feb 13

umpcah says...

the wizard wrote:
Calling The Jockster, and everyone else.

ENJOY,




I DIDN'T BELIEVE THESE LAWS AT FIRST, BUT HAVE FOUND
THEM TO BE TRUE FROM ACTUAL EXPERIENCE.


1.Law of Mechanical Repair - After your hands become coated with grease, your nose will begin to itch and you'll have to pee.

2.Law of Gravity - Any tool, nut, bolt, screw, when dropped, will roll to the least accessible corner.

3. Law of Probability- The probability of being watched is directly proportional to the stupidity of your act.

4.Law of Random Numbers - If you dial a wrong number, you never get a busy signal and someone always answers.

5.Supermarket Law - As soon as you get in the smallest line, the cashier will have to call for help.

6.Variation Law -If you change lines (or traffic lanes), the one you were in will always move faster than the one you are in now.



7.Law of the Bath - When the body is fully immersed in water, the telephone rings.

8. Law of Close Encounters - The probability of meeting someone you know increases dramatically when you are with someone you don't want to be seen with.

9. Law of the Result - When you try to prove to someone that a machine won't work, it will.

10. Law of Biomechanics - The severity of the itch is inversely proportional to the reach.

11.. Law of the Theater & Hockey Arena - At any event, the people whose seats are furthest from the aisle, always arrive last. They are the ones who will leave their seats several times to go for food, beer, or the toilet and who leave early before the end of the performance or the game is over. The folks in the aisle seats come early, never move once, have long gangly legs or big bellies and stay to the bitter end of the performance. The aisle people also are very surly folk.

12. The Coffee Law - As soon as you sit down to a cup of hot coffee, your boss will ask you to do something which will last until the coffee is cold.

13. Murphy's Law of Lockers - If there are only 2 people in a locker room, they will have adjacent lockers.

14. Law of Physical Surfaces - The chances of an open-faced jam sandwich landing face down on a floor, are directly correlated to the newness and cost of the carpet or rug.

15.Law of Logical Argument-Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

16. Brown's Law of Physical Appearance - If the clothes fit, they're ugly.

17.Oliver's Law of Public Speaking- A closed mouth gathers no feet.

18.Wilson's Law of Commercial Marketing Strategy -As soon as you find a product that you really like, they will stop making it.

19. Doctors' Law- If you don't feel well, make an appointment to go to the doctor, by the time you get there you'll feel better... But don't make an appointment, and you'll stay sick. This has been proven over and over with taking children to the pediatrician.



If you don't believe this, your belly button will unscrew and your bum will fall off.
I`m the first to say I enjoyed your last posting ! When I eat chips in bed I always put the salt in my belly button. It definitely doesn`t unscrew !
[quote][p][bold]the wizard[/bold] wrote: Calling The Jockster, and everyone else. ENJOY, I DIDN'T BELIEVE THESE LAWS AT FIRST, BUT HAVE FOUND THEM TO BE TRUE FROM ACTUAL EXPERIENCE. 1.Law of Mechanical Repair - After your hands become coated with grease, your nose will begin to itch and you'll have to pee. 2.Law of Gravity - Any tool, nut, bolt, screw, when dropped, will roll to the least accessible corner. 3. Law of Probability- The probability of being watched is directly proportional to the stupidity of your act. 4.Law of Random Numbers - If you dial a wrong number, you never get a busy signal and someone always answers. 5.Supermarket Law - As soon as you get in the smallest line, the cashier will have to call for help. 6.Variation Law -If you change lines (or traffic lanes), the one you were in will always move faster than the one you are in now. 7.Law of the Bath - When the body is fully immersed in water, the telephone rings. 8. Law of Close Encounters - The probability of meeting someone you know increases dramatically when you are with someone you don't want to be seen with. 9. Law of the Result - When you try to prove to someone that a machine won't work, it will. 10. Law of Biomechanics - The severity of the itch is inversely proportional to the reach. 11.. Law of the Theater & Hockey Arena - At any event, the people whose seats are furthest from the aisle, always arrive last. They are the ones who will leave their seats several times to go for food, beer, or the toilet and who leave early before the end of the performance or the game is over. The folks in the aisle seats come early, never move once, have long gangly legs or big bellies and stay to the bitter end of the performance. The aisle people also are very surly folk. 12. The Coffee Law - As soon as you sit down to a cup of hot coffee, your boss will ask you to do something which will last until the coffee is cold. 13. Murphy's Law of Lockers - If there are only 2 people in a locker room, they will have adjacent lockers. 14. Law of Physical Surfaces - The chances of an open-faced jam sandwich landing face down on a floor, are directly correlated to the newness and cost of the carpet or rug. 15.Law of Logical Argument-Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about. 16. Brown's Law of Physical Appearance - If the clothes fit, they're ugly. 17.Oliver's Law of Public Speaking- A closed mouth gathers no feet. 18.Wilson's Law of Commercial Marketing Strategy -As soon as you find a product that you really like, they will stop making it. 19. Doctors' Law- If you don't feel well, make an appointment to go to the doctor, by the time you get there you'll feel better... But don't make an appointment, and you'll stay sick. This has been proven over and over with taking children to the pediatrician. If you don't believe this, your belly button will unscrew and your bum will fall off.[/p][/quote]I`m the first to say I enjoyed your last posting ! When I eat chips in bed I always put the salt in my belly button. It definitely doesn`t unscrew ! umpcah
  • Score: 0

3:29pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Oi Den! says...

stfc2012 wrote:
avo wrote:
I agree with Paolo, we (the fans) are fantastic, and that was a magic moment at 3.10pm on Saturday.
.
I wonder if stfc2012 joined in? Or did he stand (by that I mean remain seated, literally) by his OTT comments?
OTT comments? Ha! Oh how some don't like a difference of opinion. It matters not whether I stand or sit. I did think it was a good effort by the fans although still over the top ego massaging. In return the manager answered nothing about his future but did decide to wave at the end to keep you all on your toes and cause more uncertainty. It's nice you wonder about what I'm doing though. Good effort from the fans but won't make any difference in the long term.
Have to agree. I stood - but only so that I could see the game. However much I admire PDC's work (most of it anyway) and want him to stay, I didn't want to join in on Saturday because I thought it was unnecessary as he already knows how well liked he is. That side of things has been in the bag since the day he walked through the door. I believe there is only one thing that will determine whether he stays or goes - the level of resources made available to him from now on. Whichever way he chooses, it seems likely that he won't have the relative riches he's had at his disposal so far in his short managerial career. Testing times ahead for him and the club I think.
.
Like you, I was impressed by the show of affection on Saturday. It just wasn't for me. Cue "grumpy old man" allegations, which I suppose I just have to take on the chin. I do support the manager but I support the club first - and the club is STFC, not PDCFC.
[quote][p][bold]stfc2012[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]avo[/bold] wrote: I agree with Paolo, we (the fans) are fantastic, and that was a magic moment at 3.10pm on Saturday. . I wonder if stfc2012 joined in? Or did he stand (by that I mean remain seated, literally) by his OTT comments?[/p][/quote]OTT comments? Ha! Oh how some don't like a difference of opinion. It matters not whether I stand or sit. I did think it was a good effort by the fans although still over the top ego massaging. In return the manager answered nothing about his future but did decide to wave at the end to keep you all on your toes and cause more uncertainty. It's nice you wonder about what I'm doing though. Good effort from the fans but won't make any difference in the long term.[/p][/quote]Have to agree. I stood - but only so that I could see the game. However much I admire PDC's work (most of it anyway) and want him to stay, I didn't want to join in on Saturday because I thought it was unnecessary as he already knows how well liked he is. That side of things has been in the bag since the day he walked through the door. I believe there is only one thing that will determine whether he stays or goes - the level of resources made available to him from now on. Whichever way he chooses, it seems likely that he won't have the relative riches he's had at his disposal so far in his short managerial career. Testing times ahead for him and the club I think. . Like you, I was impressed by the show of affection on Saturday. It just wasn't for me. Cue "grumpy old man" allegations, which I suppose I just have to take on the chin. I do support the manager but I support the club first - and the club is STFC, not PDCFC. Oi Den!
  • Score: 0

3:36pm Mon 11 Feb 13

The Jockster says...

Wiz I won't requote your post but clearly you have far too much time on your hands! And not bust a large wristwatch!
Wiz I won't requote your post but clearly you have far too much time on your hands! And not bust a large wristwatch! The Jockster
  • Score: 0

3:38pm Mon 11 Feb 13

The Jockster says...

Just not bust lol!
Just not bust lol! The Jockster
  • Score: 0

3:38pm Mon 11 Feb 13

avo says...

stfc2012 wrote:
avo wrote: I agree with Paolo, we (the fans) are fantastic, and that was a magic moment at 3.10pm on Saturday. . I wonder if stfc2012 joined in? Or did he stand (by that I mean remain seated, literally) by his OTT comments?
OTT comments? Ha! Oh how some don't like a difference of opinion. It matters not whether I stand or sit. I did think it was a good effort by the fans although still over the top ego massaging. In return the manager answered nothing about his future but did decide to wave at the end to keep you all on your toes and cause more uncertainty. It's nice you wonder about what I'm doing though. Good effort from the fans but won't make any difference in the long term.
calm down, as my post said, I just wondered if you joined in on the day, after stating on here that you thought it was all a bit over the top!
.
As someone who regularly likes to take other posters comments to task, you should have no problem with someone asking likewise about you, should you?
.
As for the manager, he stated quite clearly in his post match interview, what his current stance is, and like others have mentioned, nothing will change until everything else becomes clear. That does not mean that the fans should not show him just how much they want him to stay though.
[quote][p][bold]stfc2012[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]avo[/bold] wrote: I agree with Paolo, we (the fans) are fantastic, and that was a magic moment at 3.10pm on Saturday. . I wonder if stfc2012 joined in? Or did he stand (by that I mean remain seated, literally) by his OTT comments?[/p][/quote]OTT comments? Ha! Oh how some don't like a difference of opinion. It matters not whether I stand or sit. I did think it was a good effort by the fans although still over the top ego massaging. In return the manager answered nothing about his future but did decide to wave at the end to keep you all on your toes and cause more uncertainty. It's nice you wonder about what I'm doing though. Good effort from the fans but won't make any difference in the long term.[/p][/quote]calm down, as my post said, I just wondered if you joined in on the day, after stating on here that you thought it was all a bit over the top! . As someone who regularly likes to take other posters comments to task, you should have no problem with someone asking likewise about you, should you? . As for the manager, he stated quite clearly in his post match interview, what his current stance is, and like others have mentioned, nothing will change until everything else becomes clear. That does not mean that the fans should not show him just how much they want him to stay though. avo
  • Score: 0

3:39pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Steve. Brentford says...

the wizard wrote:
Calling The Jockster, and everyone else.

ENJOY,




I DIDN'T BELIEVE THESE LAWS AT FIRST, BUT HAVE FOUND
THEM TO BE TRUE FROM ACTUAL EXPERIENCE.


1.Law of Mechanical Repair - After your hands become coated with grease, your nose will begin to itch and you'll have to pee.

2.Law of Gravity - Any tool, nut, bolt, screw, when dropped, will roll to the least accessible corner.

3. Law of Probability- The probability of being watched is directly proportional to the stupidity of your act.

4.Law of Random Numbers - If you dial a wrong number, you never get a busy signal and someone always answers.

5.Supermarket Law - As soon as you get in the smallest line, the cashier will have to call for help.

6.Variation Law -If you change lines (or traffic lanes), the one you were in will always move faster than the one you are in now.



7.Law of the Bath - When the body is fully immersed in water, the telephone rings.

8. Law of Close Encounters - The probability of meeting someone you know increases dramatically when you are with someone you don't want to be seen with.

9. Law of the Result - When you try to prove to someone that a machine won't work, it will.

10. Law of Biomechanics - The severity of the itch is inversely proportional to the reach.

11.. Law of the Theater & Hockey Arena - At any event, the people whose seats are furthest from the aisle, always arrive last. They are the ones who will leave their seats several times to go for food, beer, or the toilet and who leave early before the end of the performance or the game is over. The folks in the aisle seats come early, never move once, have long gangly legs or big bellies and stay to the bitter end of the performance. The aisle people also are very surly folk.

12. The Coffee Law - As soon as you sit down to a cup of hot coffee, your boss will ask you to do something which will last until the coffee is cold.

13. Murphy's Law of Lockers - If there are only 2 people in a locker room, they will have adjacent lockers.

14. Law of Physical Surfaces - The chances of an open-faced jam sandwich landing face down on a floor, are directly correlated to the newness and cost of the carpet or rug.

15.Law of Logical Argument-Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

16. Brown's Law of Physical Appearance - If the clothes fit, they're ugly.

17.Oliver's Law of Public Speaking- A closed mouth gathers no feet.

18.Wilson's Law of Commercial Marketing Strategy -As soon as you find a product that you really like, they will stop making it.

19. Doctors' Law- If you don't feel well, make an appointment to go to the doctor, by the time you get there you'll feel better... But don't make an appointment, and you'll stay sick. This has been proven over and over with taking children to the pediatrician.



If you don't believe this, your belly button will unscrew and your bum will fall off.
That's you off the Multipostersshouldbe
banned`s list then Wiz,just leaves LR`s post that's worth reading for him,at this rate he wont be around for long.NEXT.

The two Ronnies are no more but it looks like a new double act has emerged The two pervies,sounds sufficient or The Granny bashers comes a close second.
[quote][p][bold]the wizard[/bold] wrote: Calling The Jockster, and everyone else. ENJOY, I DIDN'T BELIEVE THESE LAWS AT FIRST, BUT HAVE FOUND THEM TO BE TRUE FROM ACTUAL EXPERIENCE. 1.Law of Mechanical Repair - After your hands become coated with grease, your nose will begin to itch and you'll have to pee. 2.Law of Gravity - Any tool, nut, bolt, screw, when dropped, will roll to the least accessible corner. 3. Law of Probability- The probability of being watched is directly proportional to the stupidity of your act. 4.Law of Random Numbers - If you dial a wrong number, you never get a busy signal and someone always answers. 5.Supermarket Law - As soon as you get in the smallest line, the cashier will have to call for help. 6.Variation Law -If you change lines (or traffic lanes), the one you were in will always move faster than the one you are in now. 7.Law of the Bath - When the body is fully immersed in water, the telephone rings. 8. Law of Close Encounters - The probability of meeting someone you know increases dramatically when you are with someone you don't want to be seen with. 9. Law of the Result - When you try to prove to someone that a machine won't work, it will. 10. Law of Biomechanics - The severity of the itch is inversely proportional to the reach. 11.. Law of the Theater & Hockey Arena - At any event, the people whose seats are furthest from the aisle, always arrive last. They are the ones who will leave their seats several times to go for food, beer, or the toilet and who leave early before the end of the performance or the game is over. The folks in the aisle seats come early, never move once, have long gangly legs or big bellies and stay to the bitter end of the performance. The aisle people also are very surly folk. 12. The Coffee Law - As soon as you sit down to a cup of hot coffee, your boss will ask you to do something which will last until the coffee is cold. 13. Murphy's Law of Lockers - If there are only 2 people in a locker room, they will have adjacent lockers. 14. Law of Physical Surfaces - The chances of an open-faced jam sandwich landing face down on a floor, are directly correlated to the newness and cost of the carpet or rug. 15.Law of Logical Argument-Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about. 16. Brown's Law of Physical Appearance - If the clothes fit, they're ugly. 17.Oliver's Law of Public Speaking- A closed mouth gathers no feet. 18.Wilson's Law of Commercial Marketing Strategy -As soon as you find a product that you really like, they will stop making it. 19. Doctors' Law- If you don't feel well, make an appointment to go to the doctor, by the time you get there you'll feel better... But don't make an appointment, and you'll stay sick. This has been proven over and over with taking children to the pediatrician. If you don't believe this, your belly button will unscrew and your bum will fall off.[/p][/quote]That's you off the Multipostersshouldbe banned`s list then Wiz,just leaves LR`s post that's worth reading for him,at this rate he wont be around for long.NEXT. The two Ronnies are no more but it looks like a new double act has emerged The two pervies,sounds sufficient or The Granny bashers comes a close second. Steve. Brentford
  • Score: 0

3:42pm Mon 11 Feb 13

avo says...

I must add at this point that if you decided not to, that was of course your choice.
.
Oh and den, you grumpy old man you..
I must add at this point that if you decided not to, that was of course your choice. . Oh and den, you grumpy old man you.. avo
  • Score: 0

3:45pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Oi Den! says...

Cheers Avo!
Cheers Avo! Oi Den!
  • Score: 0

3:47pm Mon 11 Feb 13

jillyh says...

Carlo wrote:
Highworth red wrote:
It feels like we are a ship on the ocean in a storm with no engines. As for Paolo, I have always been a supporter, but I've had enough now. If he doesn't want to commit and isn't happy, then go and let somebody else have a crack. We have a decent squad and any half decent manager could get results with them. I can assure you there wouldn't be a shortage of applications for the job.
I think you are missing Paolo's point.

He has just had his best player sold without his knowledge. He cannot (and I wouldn't) work like this. He is correct to make his stance for the benefit of the team, otherwise there is nothing stopping them doing the same again.

This is Paolo's best opportunity to make this stand and test the board, to see if they will back him and allow him to recruit the loan players he wants
Very well put Carlo. That is why he is so unhappy and obviously needs reassurance it will not happen again - but then once betrayed..... He cannot possibly let us fans know what he and the new owners spoke about as the deal is still waiting to go through. I couldn't manage the away games but really noticed the how the balance of the team is affected by Ritchie going. I really don't want to lose him but have a horrible feeling we will. If we want championship football then a lot of money has to be put forward. Also, people seem to blame Paolo for wasting money - he doesn't sign the cheques, so really cannot be totally blamed.
[quote][p][bold]Carlo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Highworth red[/bold] wrote: It feels like we are a ship on the ocean in a storm with no engines. As for Paolo, I have always been a supporter, but I've had enough now. If he doesn't want to commit and isn't happy, then go and let somebody else have a crack. We have a decent squad and any half decent manager could get results with them. I can assure you there wouldn't be a shortage of applications for the job.[/p][/quote]I think you are missing Paolo's point. He has just had his best player sold without his knowledge. He cannot (and I wouldn't) work like this. He is correct to make his stance for the benefit of the team, otherwise there is nothing stopping them doing the same again. This is Paolo's best opportunity to make this stand and test the board, to see if they will back him and allow him to recruit the loan players he wants[/p][/quote]Very well put Carlo. That is why he is so unhappy and obviously needs reassurance it will not happen again - but then once betrayed..... He cannot possibly let us fans know what he and the new owners spoke about as the deal is still waiting to go through. I couldn't manage the away games but really noticed the how the balance of the team is affected by Ritchie going. I really don't want to lose him but have a horrible feeling we will. If we want championship football then a lot of money has to be put forward. Also, people seem to blame Paolo for wasting money - he doesn't sign the cheques, so really cannot be totally blamed. jillyh
  • Score: 0

3:59pm Mon 11 Feb 13

DarrenSTFCRomain says...

Steve. Brentford wrote:
Steve. Brentford wrote: I`m scared!!
"to post my real thoughts under my own user-name so i will offend all but two posters on here under a different name and then post under my own name so no one i have a debate with in the future will know what i think of there opinions" Get a back-bone and speak up or shut up. To much sh*t stirring on here and not much respect to and from our own fans,add to that the scaremongering and over reactions it all getting a bit too much,over 5 yrs i have posted on here,i have made some new mates become reacquainted with old friends and learnt that others are as caring of STFC as i am, i have fallen out with a few over certain things but never held grudges and regularly debate,banter or agree and disagree with those same posters,we are Swindon fans that's what we have in common and that is why come on this site people need to chill out a little and have some patience. LR is someone i have had lively debates(arguments) with in the past although ninety per cent of the time i agree with him and i make him right with regards to the scaremongering put up or shut up. I feel better now!
I HOPE IM 1 OF THE 2...
But then again you allways pick on me...
BECAUSE YOUR NASTY !!!! ?

Anyway Hows things mate...
[quote][p][bold]Steve. Brentford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve. Brentford[/bold] wrote: I`m scared!![/p][/quote]"to post my real thoughts under my own user-name so i will offend all but two posters on here under a different name and then post under my own name so no one i have a debate with in the future will know what i think of there opinions" Get a back-bone and speak up or shut up. To much sh*t stirring on here and not much respect to and from our own fans,add to that the scaremongering and over reactions it all getting a bit too much,over 5 yrs i have posted on here,i have made some new mates become reacquainted with old friends and learnt that others are as caring of STFC as i am, i have fallen out with a few over certain things but never held grudges and regularly debate,banter or agree and disagree with those same posters,we are Swindon fans that's what we have in common and that is why come on this site people need to chill out a little and have some patience. LR is someone i have had lively debates(arguments) with in the past although ninety per cent of the time i agree with him and i make him right with regards to the scaremongering put up or shut up. I feel better now![/p][/quote]I HOPE IM 1 OF THE 2... But then again you allways pick on me... BECAUSE YOUR NASTY !!!! ? Anyway Hows things mate... DarrenSTFCRomain
  • Score: 0

4:04pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Tomcat 1944 says...

Paolo wanted Clarke, Kerrouche and Magera plus others who he subsequently discarded for various reasons all of whom cost us, a firmer chairman would have told him to play them not replace them at even more cost. Don't get me wrong I'm a PDC fan but he does have shortcomings that have cost this club a lot of money.
Paolo wanted Clarke, Kerrouche and Magera plus others who he subsequently discarded for various reasons all of whom cost us, a firmer chairman would have told him to play them not replace them at even more cost. Don't get me wrong I'm a PDC fan but he does have shortcomings that have cost this club a lot of money. Tomcat 1944
  • Score: 0

4:04pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Tomcat 1944 says...

Paolo wanted Clarke, Kerrouche and Magera plus others who he subsequently discarded for various reasons all of whom cost us, a firmer chairman would have told him to play them not replace them at even more cost. Don't get me wrong I'm a PDC fan but he does have shortcomings that have cost this club a lot of money.
Paolo wanted Clarke, Kerrouche and Magera plus others who he subsequently discarded for various reasons all of whom cost us, a firmer chairman would have told him to play them not replace them at even more cost. Don't get me wrong I'm a PDC fan but he does have shortcomings that have cost this club a lot of money. Tomcat 1944
  • Score: 0

4:19pm Mon 11 Feb 13

DarrenSTFCRomain says...

SAPFanSTFC wrote:
London Red wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)
So what was they doing that was so bad..
WAS THEY DRINKING AND LAUGHING ?

What was they doing that makes them the wrong people to put there money in 2 STFC...

I was not there so please tell
[quote][p][bold]SAPFanSTFC[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)[/p][/quote]So what was they doing that was so bad.. WAS THEY DRINKING AND LAUGHING ? What was they doing that makes them the wrong people to put there money in 2 STFC... I was not there so please tell DarrenSTFCRomain
  • Score: 0

4:21pm Mon 11 Feb 13

smirg kcab says...

Just like to add another view from Saturday, I thought hpool was one of the best bottom sides to play football at the c/g yes we should have won perhaps by a big margin, but we didn't and I was very impressed the way they kept the ball, they had more possession than us, they meet Pompey at home tomorrow and will get off the bottom.
Two frustrating games against them but hey ho we look forward to trannie.
Onwards and upwards
Just like to add another view from Saturday, I thought hpool was one of the best bottom sides to play football at the c/g yes we should have won perhaps by a big margin, but we didn't and I was very impressed the way they kept the ball, they had more possession than us, they meet Pompey at home tomorrow and will get off the bottom. Two frustrating games against them but hey ho we look forward to trannie. Onwards and upwards smirg kcab
  • Score: 0

4:25pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Steve. Brentford says...

DarrenSTFCRomain wrote:
SAPFanSTFC wrote:
London Red wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)
So what was they doing that was so bad..
WAS THEY DRINKING AND LAUGHING ?

What was they doing that makes them the wrong people to put there money in 2 STFC...

I was not there so please tell
I heard they were
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^Wait for it Dazza
********************
********************
********************
********************
********************
*************Smiling
.AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAA what a bunch of ********** a mate
[quote][p][bold]DarrenSTFCRomain[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SAPFanSTFC[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)[/p][/quote]So what was they doing that was so bad.. WAS THEY DRINKING AND LAUGHING ? What was they doing that makes them the wrong people to put there money in 2 STFC... I was not there so please tell[/p][/quote]I heard they were ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^Wait for it Dazza ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** *************Smiling .AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA what a bunch of ********** a mate Steve. Brentford
  • Score: 0

4:30pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Oi Den! says...

jillyh wrote:
Carlo wrote:
Highworth red wrote:
It feels like we are a ship on the ocean in a storm with no engines. As for Paolo, I have always been a supporter, but I've had enough now. If he doesn't want to commit and isn't happy, then go and let somebody else have a crack. We have a decent squad and any half decent manager could get results with them. I can assure you there wouldn't be a shortage of applications for the job.
I think you are missing Paolo's point.

He has just had his best player sold without his knowledge. He cannot (and I wouldn't) work like this. He is correct to make his stance for the benefit of the team, otherwise there is nothing stopping them doing the same again.

This is Paolo's best opportunity to make this stand and test the board, to see if they will back him and allow him to recruit the loan players he wants
Very well put Carlo. That is why he is so unhappy and obviously needs reassurance it will not happen again - but then once betrayed..... He cannot possibly let us fans know what he and the new owners spoke about as the deal is still waiting to go through. I couldn't manage the away games but really noticed the how the balance of the team is affected by Ritchie going. I really don't want to lose him but have a horrible feeling we will. If we want championship football then a lot of money has to be put forward. Also, people seem to blame Paolo for wasting money - he doesn't sign the cheques, so really cannot be totally blamed.
Blimey, that last line is a very thin defence! So, presumably Jeremy Wray is firmly in your sights then? Or does Andrew Black get the blame for giving JW and PDC authority to look after the budget for him?
[quote][p][bold]jillyh[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Carlo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Highworth red[/bold] wrote: It feels like we are a ship on the ocean in a storm with no engines. As for Paolo, I have always been a supporter, but I've had enough now. If he doesn't want to commit and isn't happy, then go and let somebody else have a crack. We have a decent squad and any half decent manager could get results with them. I can assure you there wouldn't be a shortage of applications for the job.[/p][/quote]I think you are missing Paolo's point. He has just had his best player sold without his knowledge. He cannot (and I wouldn't) work like this. He is correct to make his stance for the benefit of the team, otherwise there is nothing stopping them doing the same again. This is Paolo's best opportunity to make this stand and test the board, to see if they will back him and allow him to recruit the loan players he wants[/p][/quote]Very well put Carlo. That is why he is so unhappy and obviously needs reassurance it will not happen again - but then once betrayed..... He cannot possibly let us fans know what he and the new owners spoke about as the deal is still waiting to go through. I couldn't manage the away games but really noticed the how the balance of the team is affected by Ritchie going. I really don't want to lose him but have a horrible feeling we will. If we want championship football then a lot of money has to be put forward. Also, people seem to blame Paolo for wasting money - he doesn't sign the cheques, so really cannot be totally blamed.[/p][/quote]Blimey, that last line is a very thin defence! So, presumably Jeremy Wray is firmly in your sights then? Or does Andrew Black get the blame for giving JW and PDC authority to look after the budget for him? Oi Den!
  • Score: 0

4:32pm Mon 11 Feb 13

stfc2012 says...

avo wrote:
stfc2012 wrote:
avo wrote: I agree with Paolo, we (the fans) are fantastic, and that was a magic moment at 3.10pm on Saturday. . I wonder if stfc2012 joined in? Or did he stand (by that I mean remain seated, literally) by his OTT comments?
OTT comments? Ha! Oh how some don't like a difference of opinion. It matters not whether I stand or sit. I did think it was a good effort by the fans although still over the top ego massaging. In return the manager answered nothing about his future but did decide to wave at the end to keep you all on your toes and cause more uncertainty. It's nice you wonder about what I'm doing though. Good effort from the fans but won't make any difference in the long term.
calm down, as my post said, I just wondered if you joined in on the day, after stating on here that you thought it was all a bit over the top!
.
As someone who regularly likes to take other posters comments to task, you should have no problem with someone asking likewise about you, should you?
.
As for the manager, he stated quite clearly in his post match interview, what his current stance is, and like others have mentioned, nothing will change until everything else becomes clear. That does not mean that the fans should not show him just how much they want him to stay though.
I am calm - well about as always. Like I said fair play to those that stood up for PDC as I am sure he got the message. After standing there shouting at Hoddle to stay Ive come to realise that it may be futile. I wasn't impressed by how PDC responded with his ambiguous wave at the end and have believed there has always been an OTT show of unconditional love towards him and its clear he knows how to say the right things to milk it. I will just be glad when its all over and the club can plan ahead. I think he has to walk now after making that long statement but there may be good reason why he can't just yet. I'm not saying I want him to leave but I think his handling of things has to change but can't see that happening. Time will tell
[quote][p][bold]avo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]stfc2012[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]avo[/bold] wrote: I agree with Paolo, we (the fans) are fantastic, and that was a magic moment at 3.10pm on Saturday. . I wonder if stfc2012 joined in? Or did he stand (by that I mean remain seated, literally) by his OTT comments?[/p][/quote]OTT comments? Ha! Oh how some don't like a difference of opinion. It matters not whether I stand or sit. I did think it was a good effort by the fans although still over the top ego massaging. In return the manager answered nothing about his future but did decide to wave at the end to keep you all on your toes and cause more uncertainty. It's nice you wonder about what I'm doing though. Good effort from the fans but won't make any difference in the long term.[/p][/quote]calm down, as my post said, I just wondered if you joined in on the day, after stating on here that you thought it was all a bit over the top! . As someone who regularly likes to take other posters comments to task, you should have no problem with someone asking likewise about you, should you? . As for the manager, he stated quite clearly in his post match interview, what his current stance is, and like others have mentioned, nothing will change until everything else becomes clear. That does not mean that the fans should not show him just how much they want him to stay though.[/p][/quote]I am calm - well about as always. Like I said fair play to those that stood up for PDC as I am sure he got the message. After standing there shouting at Hoddle to stay Ive come to realise that it may be futile. I wasn't impressed by how PDC responded with his ambiguous wave at the end and have believed there has always been an OTT show of unconditional love towards him and its clear he knows how to say the right things to milk it. I will just be glad when its all over and the club can plan ahead. I think he has to walk now after making that long statement but there may be good reason why he can't just yet. I'm not saying I want him to leave but I think his handling of things has to change but can't see that happening. Time will tell stfc2012
  • Score: 0

4:32pm Mon 11 Feb 13

DarrenSTFCRomain says...

Steve. Brentford wrote:
DarrenSTFCRomain wrote:
SAPFanSTFC wrote:
London Red wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)
So what was they doing that was so bad.. WAS THEY DRINKING AND LAUGHING ? What was they doing that makes them the wrong people to put there money in 2 STFC... I was not there so please tell
I heard they were ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^Wait for it Dazza ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** *************Smiling .AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA what a bunch of ********** a mate
NO was they !!!!! What a bunch of donald duckers...
ITS JUST NOT ON
NOT ON I TELL YOU NOT ON
[quote][p][bold]Steve. Brentford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DarrenSTFCRomain[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SAPFanSTFC[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)[/p][/quote]So what was they doing that was so bad.. WAS THEY DRINKING AND LAUGHING ? What was they doing that makes them the wrong people to put there money in 2 STFC... I was not there so please tell[/p][/quote]I heard they were ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^Wait for it Dazza ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** *************Smiling .AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA what a bunch of ********** a mate[/p][/quote]NO was they !!!!! What a bunch of donald duckers... ITS JUST NOT ON NOT ON I TELL YOU NOT ON DarrenSTFCRomain
  • Score: 0

4:34pm Mon 11 Feb 13

the don69 says...

Tomcat 1944 wrote:
Paolo wanted Clarke, Kerrouche and Magera plus others who he subsequently discarded for various reasons all of whom cost us, a firmer chairman would have told him to play them not replace them at even more cost. Don't get me wrong I'm a PDC fan but he does have shortcomings that have cost this club a lot of money.
That's a very fair post Tomcat!and there's a few more to add to that list!but hey he ain't perfect and in my opinion is still a Rookie manager learning fast!still not ready for that big job yet Paolo,best stay here for a while longer and keep learning,cause if you pick the wrong job,it can all go belly up as it has for many managers in the past who have moved too soon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[quote][p][bold]Tomcat 1944[/bold] wrote: Paolo wanted Clarke, Kerrouche and Magera plus others who he subsequently discarded for various reasons all of whom cost us, a firmer chairman would have told him to play them not replace them at even more cost. Don't get me wrong I'm a PDC fan but he does have shortcomings that have cost this club a lot of money.[/p][/quote]That's a very fair post Tomcat!and there's a few more to add to that list!but hey he ain't perfect and in my opinion is still a Rookie manager learning fast!still not ready for that big job yet Paolo,best stay here for a while longer and keep learning,cause if you pick the wrong job,it can all go belly up as it has for many managers in the past who have moved too soon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! the don69
  • Score: 0

4:37pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Steve. Brentford says...

Tomcat 1944 wrote:
Paolo wanted Clarke, Kerrouche and Magera plus others who he subsequently discarded for various reasons all of whom cost us, a firmer chairman would have told him to play them not replace them at even more cost. Don't get me wrong I'm a PDC fan but he does have shortcomings that have cost this club a lot of money.
Yep no question about that Tom but i believe he has learnt a lot about management since he has been here and IMO has plenty more to learn before he is ready for the big time,for instance i don't know if his style of management would work with the massive ego`s that come with the big clubs and then you have some of the owners/chairmen would they play ball and bend over to accommodate OUR Paolo`s ego.Time will tell i suppose but as with the vast majority of Town fans hope he see`s his contract out with us and builds a decent relationship with the incoming owners/investors,Gla
d you finally come across Tom happy posting.
[quote][p][bold]Tomcat 1944[/bold] wrote: Paolo wanted Clarke, Kerrouche and Magera plus others who he subsequently discarded for various reasons all of whom cost us, a firmer chairman would have told him to play them not replace them at even more cost. Don't get me wrong I'm a PDC fan but he does have shortcomings that have cost this club a lot of money.[/p][/quote]Yep no question about that Tom but i believe he has learnt a lot about management since he has been here and IMO has plenty more to learn before he is ready for the big time,for instance i don't know if his style of management would work with the massive ego`s that come with the big clubs and then you have some of the owners/chairmen would they play ball and bend over to accommodate OUR Paolo`s ego.Time will tell i suppose but as with the vast majority of Town fans hope he see`s his contract out with us and builds a decent relationship with the incoming owners/investors,Gla d you finally come across Tom happy posting. Steve. Brentford
  • Score: 0

4:48pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Doctor red says...

Paolo Paolo Please don't go,
Not just yet,let's just finish the show.
Promotion now must be the aim,
Again this will just enhance your fame!

Listen to the people who care
We don't want you going anywhere,
Stay with us enjoy the ride
That's what we want, both joy and pride!

Not long to go, till season end
Stay with us and be our friend,
Another promotion is on again
Now is the time to fight, and not to wane.

Paolo Paolo we love you,
Stick with us and don't be blue
You know what we you to do
take us up again to the old division two

Say we are going up!

The DOC (poem 6)
Paolo Paolo Please don't go, Not just yet,let's just finish the show. Promotion now must be the aim, Again this will just enhance your fame! Listen to the people who care We don't want you going anywhere, Stay with us enjoy the ride That's what we want, both joy and pride! Not long to go, till season end Stay with us and be our friend, Another promotion is on again Now is the time to fight, and not to wane. Paolo Paolo we love you, Stick with us and don't be blue You know what we you to do take us up again to the old division two Say we are going up! The DOC (poem 6) Doctor red
  • Score: 0

4:50pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Steve. Brentford says...

the don69 wrote:
Tomcat 1944 wrote:
Paolo wanted Clarke, Kerrouche and Magera plus others who he subsequently discarded for various reasons all of whom cost us, a firmer chairman would have told him to play them not replace them at even more cost. Don't get me wrong I'm a PDC fan but he does have shortcomings that have cost this club a lot of money.
That's a very fair post Tomcat!and there's a few more to add to that list!but hey he ain't perfect and in my opinion is still a Rookie manager learning fast!still not ready for that big job yet Paolo,best stay here for a while longer and keep learning,cause if you pick the wrong job,it can all go belly up as it has for many managers in the past who have moved too soon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Crossed posts Don,although you crossed the "finish line first" (i`ll spot assing around now) our posts mount to very much the same.
[quote][p][bold]the don69[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tomcat 1944[/bold] wrote: Paolo wanted Clarke, Kerrouche and Magera plus others who he subsequently discarded for various reasons all of whom cost us, a firmer chairman would have told him to play them not replace them at even more cost. Don't get me wrong I'm a PDC fan but he does have shortcomings that have cost this club a lot of money.[/p][/quote]That's a very fair post Tomcat!and there's a few more to add to that list!but hey he ain't perfect and in my opinion is still a Rookie manager learning fast!still not ready for that big job yet Paolo,best stay here for a while longer and keep learning,cause if you pick the wrong job,it can all go belly up as it has for many managers in the past who have moved too soon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![/p][/quote]Crossed posts Don,although you crossed the "finish line first" (i`ll spot assing around now) our posts mount to very much the same. Steve. Brentford
  • Score: 0

4:51pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Doctor red says...

Paolo Paolo Please don't go,
Not just yet,let's just finish the show.
Promotion now must be the aim,
Again this will just enhance your fame!

Listen to the people who care
We don't want you going anywhere,
Stay with us enjoy the ride
That's what we want, both joy and pride!

Not long to go, till season end
Stay with us and be our friend,
Another promotion is on again
Now is the time to fight, and not to wane.

Paolo Paolo we love you,
Stick with us and don't be blue
You know what we want you to do
take us up again to the old division two

Say we are going up!

The DOC (poem 6)a missed word
Paolo Paolo Please don't go, Not just yet,let's just finish the show. Promotion now must be the aim, Again this will just enhance your fame! Listen to the people who care We don't want you going anywhere, Stay with us enjoy the ride That's what we want, both joy and pride! Not long to go, till season end Stay with us and be our friend, Another promotion is on again Now is the time to fight, and not to wane. Paolo Paolo we love you, Stick with us and don't be blue You know what we want you to do take us up again to the old division two Say we are going up! The DOC (poem 6)a missed word Doctor red
  • Score: 0

4:51pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Doctor red says...

Paolo Paolo Please don't go,
Not just yet,let's just finish the show.
Promotion now must be the aim,
Again this will just enhance your fame!

Listen to the people who care
We don't want you going anywhere,
Stay with us enjoy the ride
That's what we want, both joy and pride!

Not long to go, till season end
Stay with us and be our friend,
Another promotion is on again
Now is the time to fight, and not to wane.

Paolo Paolo we love you,
Stick with us and don't be blue
You know what we want you to do
take us up again to the old division two

Say we are going up!

The DOC (poem 6)a missed word
Paolo Paolo Please don't go, Not just yet,let's just finish the show. Promotion now must be the aim, Again this will just enhance your fame! Listen to the people who care We don't want you going anywhere, Stay with us enjoy the ride That's what we want, both joy and pride! Not long to go, till season end Stay with us and be our friend, Another promotion is on again Now is the time to fight, and not to wane. Paolo Paolo we love you, Stick with us and don't be blue You know what we want you to do take us up again to the old division two Say we are going up! The DOC (poem 6)a missed word Doctor red
  • Score: 0

4:52pm Mon 11 Feb 13

jillyh says...

Oi Den! wrote:
jillyh wrote:
Carlo wrote:
Highworth red wrote:
It feels like we are a ship on the ocean in a storm with no engines. As for Paolo, I have always been a supporter, but I've had enough now. If he doesn't want to commit and isn't happy, then go and let somebody else have a crack. We have a decent squad and any half decent manager could get results with them. I can assure you there wouldn't be a shortage of applications for the job.
I think you are missing Paolo's point.

He has just had his best player sold without his knowledge. He cannot (and I wouldn't) work like this. He is correct to make his stance for the benefit of the team, otherwise there is nothing stopping them doing the same again.

This is Paolo's best opportunity to make this stand and test the board, to see if they will back him and allow him to recruit the loan players he wants
Very well put Carlo. That is why he is so unhappy and obviously needs reassurance it will not happen again - but then once betrayed..... He cannot possibly let us fans know what he and the new owners spoke about as the deal is still waiting to go through. I couldn't manage the away games but really noticed the how the balance of the team is affected by Ritchie going. I really don't want to lose him but have a horrible feeling we will. If we want championship football then a lot of money has to be put forward. Also, people seem to blame Paolo for wasting money - he doesn't sign the cheques, so really cannot be totally blamed.
Blimey, that last line is a very thin defence! So, presumably Jeremy Wray is firmly in your sights then? Or does Andrew Black get the blame for giving JW and PDC authority to look after the budget for him?
Not defence - a fact that the BOARD need to authorise the money. I certainly lay no blame at any individual.
[quote][p][bold]Oi Den![/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]jillyh[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Carlo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Highworth red[/bold] wrote: It feels like we are a ship on the ocean in a storm with no engines. As for Paolo, I have always been a supporter, but I've had enough now. If he doesn't want to commit and isn't happy, then go and let somebody else have a crack. We have a decent squad and any half decent manager could get results with them. I can assure you there wouldn't be a shortage of applications for the job.[/p][/quote]I think you are missing Paolo's point. He has just had his best player sold without his knowledge. He cannot (and I wouldn't) work like this. He is correct to make his stance for the benefit of the team, otherwise there is nothing stopping them doing the same again. This is Paolo's best opportunity to make this stand and test the board, to see if they will back him and allow him to recruit the loan players he wants[/p][/quote]Very well put Carlo. That is why he is so unhappy and obviously needs reassurance it will not happen again - but then once betrayed..... He cannot possibly let us fans know what he and the new owners spoke about as the deal is still waiting to go through. I couldn't manage the away games but really noticed the how the balance of the team is affected by Ritchie going. I really don't want to lose him but have a horrible feeling we will. If we want championship football then a lot of money has to be put forward. Also, people seem to blame Paolo for wasting money - he doesn't sign the cheques, so really cannot be totally blamed.[/p][/quote]Blimey, that last line is a very thin defence! So, presumably Jeremy Wray is firmly in your sights then? Or does Andrew Black get the blame for giving JW and PDC authority to look after the budget for him?[/p][/quote]Not defence - a fact that the BOARD need to authorise the money. I certainly lay no blame at any individual. jillyh
  • Score: 0

4:55pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Steve. Brentford says...

Doctor red wrote:
Paolo Paolo Please don't go,
Not just yet,let's just finish the show.
Promotion now must be the aim,
Again this will just enhance your fame!

Listen to the people who care
We don't want you going anywhere,
Stay with us enjoy the ride
That's what we want, both joy and pride!

Not long to go, till season end
Stay with us and be our friend,
Another promotion is on again
Now is the time to fight, and not to wane.

Paolo Paolo we love you,
Stick with us and don't be blue
You know what we want you to do
take us up again to the old division two

Say we are going up!

The DOC (poem 6)a missed word
I enjoyed the first one best Doc.
[quote][p][bold]Doctor red[/bold] wrote: Paolo Paolo Please don't go, Not just yet,let's just finish the show. Promotion now must be the aim, Again this will just enhance your fame! Listen to the people who care We don't want you going anywhere, Stay with us enjoy the ride That's what we want, both joy and pride! Not long to go, till season end Stay with us and be our friend, Another promotion is on again Now is the time to fight, and not to wane. Paolo Paolo we love you, Stick with us and don't be blue You know what we want you to do take us up again to the old division two Say we are going up! The DOC (poem 6)a missed word[/p][/quote]I enjoyed the first one best Doc. Steve. Brentford
  • Score: 0

5:11pm Mon 11 Feb 13

SAPFanSTFC says...

DarrenSTFCRomain wrote:
Steve. Brentford wrote:
DarrenSTFCRomain wrote:
SAPFanSTFC wrote:
London Red wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)
So what was they doing that was so bad.. WAS THEY DRINKING AND LAUGHING ? What was they doing that makes them the wrong people to put there money in 2 STFC... I was not there so please tell
I heard they were ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^Wait for it Dazza ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** *************Smiling .AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA what a bunch of ********** a mate
NO was they !!!!! What a bunch of donald duckers...
ITS JUST NOT ON
NOT ON I TELL YOU NOT ON
No doubt you'll both be laughing early next season!...Would love to say what I think of you both at this critical point in the progress of STFC but being honest - I'm better than that.
...
So glad you both think you're so clever...just shows what you really think....I just hope you're not realising that you missed the one critical point where Jock and I actually agreed....was actually right!?...
.
....Because we WON't BE HAPPY AT BEING RIGHT!!!...even Napolean had more common sense than you two!!
....
So many of you think it is a personal journey to the 'I Was Right!' brigade yet you fail to see that SOME people actually care as much as you and have gone from being 110% positive about this whole sale to being...well pretty darned sh1tless!
...
But don't let the facts bother you eh!?
...
I'm outta here and not going to bother reading the drivvel from you two either....thought you were better and more commonsensical than that - but nope back into the cupboard eh!?
[quote][p][bold]DarrenSTFCRomain[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve. Brentford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DarrenSTFCRomain[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SAPFanSTFC[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)[/p][/quote]So what was they doing that was so bad.. WAS THEY DRINKING AND LAUGHING ? What was they doing that makes them the wrong people to put there money in 2 STFC... I was not there so please tell[/p][/quote]I heard they were ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^Wait for it Dazza ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** *************Smiling .AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA what a bunch of ********** a mate[/p][/quote]NO was they !!!!! What a bunch of donald duckers... ITS JUST NOT ON NOT ON I TELL YOU NOT ON[/p][/quote]No doubt you'll both be laughing early next season!...Would love to say what I think of you both at this critical point in the progress of STFC but being honest - I'm better than that. ... So glad you both think you're so clever...just shows what you really think....I just hope you're not realising that you missed the one critical point where Jock and I actually agreed....was actually right!?... . ....Because we WON't BE HAPPY AT BEING RIGHT!!!...even Napolean had more common sense than you two!! .... So many of you think it is a personal journey to the 'I Was Right!' brigade yet you fail to see that SOME people actually care as much as you and have gone from being 110% positive about this whole sale to being...well pretty darned sh1tless! ... But don't let the facts bother you eh!? ... I'm outta here and not going to bother reading the drivvel from you two either....thought you were better and more commonsensical than that - but nope back into the cupboard eh!? SAPFanSTFC
  • Score: 0

5:26pm Mon 11 Feb 13

old town robin says...

the wizard wrote:
Calling The Jockster, and everyone else.

ENJOY,




I DIDN'T BELIEVE THESE LAWS AT FIRST, BUT HAVE FOUND
THEM TO BE TRUE FROM ACTUAL EXPERIENCE.


1.Law of Mechanical Repair - After your hands become coated with grease, your nose will begin to itch and you'll have to pee.

2.Law of Gravity - Any tool, nut, bolt, screw, when dropped, will roll to the least accessible corner.

3. Law of Probability- The probability of being watched is directly proportional to the stupidity of your act.

4.Law of Random Numbers - If you dial a wrong number, you never get a busy signal and someone always answers.

5.Supermarket Law - As soon as you get in the smallest line, the cashier will have to call for help.

6.Variation Law -If you change lines (or traffic lanes), the one you were in will always move faster than the one you are in now.



7.Law of the Bath - When the body is fully immersed in water, the telephone rings.

8. Law of Close Encounters - The probability of meeting someone you know increases dramatically when you are with someone you don't want to be seen with.

9. Law of the Result - When you try to prove to someone that a machine won't work, it will.

10. Law of Biomechanics - The severity of the itch is inversely proportional to the reach.

11.. Law of the Theater & Hockey Arena - At any event, the people whose seats are furthest from the aisle, always arrive last. They are the ones who will leave their seats several times to go for food, beer, or the toilet and who leave early before the end of the performance or the game is over. The folks in the aisle seats come early, never move once, have long gangly legs or big bellies and stay to the bitter end of the performance. The aisle people also are very surly folk.

12. The Coffee Law - As soon as you sit down to a cup of hot coffee, your boss will ask you to do something which will last until the coffee is cold.

13. Murphy's Law of Lockers - If there are only 2 people in a locker room, they will have adjacent lockers.

14. Law of Physical Surfaces - The chances of an open-faced jam sandwich landing face down on a floor, are directly correlated to the newness and cost of the carpet or rug.

15.Law of Logical Argument-Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

16. Brown's Law of Physical Appearance - If the clothes fit, they're ugly.

17.Oliver's Law of Public Speaking- A closed mouth gathers no feet.

18.Wilson's Law of Commercial Marketing Strategy -As soon as you find a product that you really like, they will stop making it.

19. Doctors' Law- If you don't feel well, make an appointment to go to the doctor, by the time you get there you'll feel better... But don't make an appointment, and you'll stay sick. This has been proven over and over with taking children to the pediatrician.



If you don't believe this, your belly button will unscrew and your bum will fall off.
some good laws there, number 15 is my favourite because it aptly fits my wife to a tee.
15.Law of Logical Argument-Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
[quote][p][bold]the wizard[/bold] wrote: Calling The Jockster, and everyone else. ENJOY, I DIDN'T BELIEVE THESE LAWS AT FIRST, BUT HAVE FOUND THEM TO BE TRUE FROM ACTUAL EXPERIENCE. 1.Law of Mechanical Repair - After your hands become coated with grease, your nose will begin to itch and you'll have to pee. 2.Law of Gravity - Any tool, nut, bolt, screw, when dropped, will roll to the least accessible corner. 3. Law of Probability- The probability of being watched is directly proportional to the stupidity of your act. 4.Law of Random Numbers - If you dial a wrong number, you never get a busy signal and someone always answers. 5.Supermarket Law - As soon as you get in the smallest line, the cashier will have to call for help. 6.Variation Law -If you change lines (or traffic lanes), the one you were in will always move faster than the one you are in now. 7.Law of the Bath - When the body is fully immersed in water, the telephone rings. 8. Law of Close Encounters - The probability of meeting someone you know increases dramatically when you are with someone you don't want to be seen with. 9. Law of the Result - When you try to prove to someone that a machine won't work, it will. 10. Law of Biomechanics - The severity of the itch is inversely proportional to the reach. 11.. Law of the Theater & Hockey Arena - At any event, the people whose seats are furthest from the aisle, always arrive last. They are the ones who will leave their seats several times to go for food, beer, or the toilet and who leave early before the end of the performance or the game is over. The folks in the aisle seats come early, never move once, have long gangly legs or big bellies and stay to the bitter end of the performance. The aisle people also are very surly folk. 12. The Coffee Law - As soon as you sit down to a cup of hot coffee, your boss will ask you to do something which will last until the coffee is cold. 13. Murphy's Law of Lockers - If there are only 2 people in a locker room, they will have adjacent lockers. 14. Law of Physical Surfaces - The chances of an open-faced jam sandwich landing face down on a floor, are directly correlated to the newness and cost of the carpet or rug. 15.Law of Logical Argument-Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about. 16. Brown's Law of Physical Appearance - If the clothes fit, they're ugly. 17.Oliver's Law of Public Speaking- A closed mouth gathers no feet. 18.Wilson's Law of Commercial Marketing Strategy -As soon as you find a product that you really like, they will stop making it. 19. Doctors' Law- If you don't feel well, make an appointment to go to the doctor, by the time you get there you'll feel better... But don't make an appointment, and you'll stay sick. This has been proven over and over with taking children to the pediatrician. If you don't believe this, your belly button will unscrew and your bum will fall off.[/p][/quote]some good laws there, number 15 is my favourite because it aptly fits my wife to a tee. 15.Law of Logical Argument-Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about. old town robin
  • Score: 0

5:26pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Steve. Brentford says...

SAPFanSTFC wrote:
DarrenSTFCRomain wrote:
Steve. Brentford wrote:
DarrenSTFCRomain wrote:
SAPFanSTFC wrote:
London Red wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)
So what was they doing that was so bad.. WAS THEY DRINKING AND LAUGHING ? What was they doing that makes them the wrong people to put there money in 2 STFC... I was not there so please tell
I heard they were ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^Wait for it Dazza ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** *************Smiling .AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA what a bunch of ********** a mate
NO was they !!!!! What a bunch of donald duckers...
ITS JUST NOT ON
NOT ON I TELL YOU NOT ON
No doubt you'll both be laughing early next season!...Would love to say what I think of you both at this critical point in the progress of STFC but being honest - I'm better than that.
...
So glad you both think you're so clever...just shows what you really think....I just hope you're not realising that you missed the one critical point where Jock and I actually agreed....was actually right!?...
.
....Because we WON't BE HAPPY AT BEING RIGHT!!!...even Napolean had more common sense than you two!!
....
So many of you think it is a personal journey to the 'I Was Right!' brigade yet you fail to see that SOME people actually care as much as you and have gone from being 110% positive about this whole sale to being...well pretty darned sh1tless!
...
But don't let the facts bother you eh!?
...
I'm outta here and not going to bother reading the drivvel from you two either....thought you were better and more commonsensical than that - but nope back into the cupboard eh!?
Why don't you calm yourself down a little bit i/we were just making best of of bad situation,SAP i don't think you are in the right frame of mind to be replying to two long time posters who don't have a dig at you over your opinions whether i totally agree with you or not but don't take things so personal i never abused you so why do you think it`s ok to do so to me,couldn't you reply in a more constructive way,since when have i ever had any serious conversation`s with Darren,i reckon you need to calm down and save any offencive postings for people who are being offencive to you.
[quote][p][bold]SAPFanSTFC[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DarrenSTFCRomain[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve. Brentford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DarrenSTFCRomain[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SAPFanSTFC[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)[/p][/quote]So what was they doing that was so bad.. WAS THEY DRINKING AND LAUGHING ? What was they doing that makes them the wrong people to put there money in 2 STFC... I was not there so please tell[/p][/quote]I heard they were ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^Wait for it Dazza ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** *************Smiling .AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA what a bunch of ********** a mate[/p][/quote]NO was they !!!!! What a bunch of donald duckers... ITS JUST NOT ON NOT ON I TELL YOU NOT ON[/p][/quote]No doubt you'll both be laughing early next season!...Would love to say what I think of you both at this critical point in the progress of STFC but being honest - I'm better than that. ... So glad you both think you're so clever...just shows what you really think....I just hope you're not realising that you missed the one critical point where Jock and I actually agreed....was actually right!?... . ....Because we WON't BE HAPPY AT BEING RIGHT!!!...even Napolean had more common sense than you two!! .... So many of you think it is a personal journey to the 'I Was Right!' brigade yet you fail to see that SOME people actually care as much as you and have gone from being 110% positive about this whole sale to being...well pretty darned sh1tless! ... But don't let the facts bother you eh!? ... I'm outta here and not going to bother reading the drivvel from you two either....thought you were better and more commonsensical than that - but nope back into the cupboard eh!?[/p][/quote]Why don't you calm yourself down a little bit i/we were just making best of of bad situation,SAP i don't think you are in the right frame of mind to be replying to two long time posters who don't have a dig at you over your opinions whether i totally agree with you or not but don't take things so personal i never abused you so why do you think it`s ok to do so to me,couldn't you reply in a more constructive way,since when have i ever had any serious conversation`s with Darren,i reckon you need to calm down and save any offencive postings for people who are being offencive to you. Steve. Brentford
  • Score: 0

5:36pm Mon 11 Feb 13

smirg kcab says...

Exclusive - Tony Cottee blasts West Ham as they stall on a new contract for Sam Allardyce

By Anton Stanley
Monday, February 11, 2013


Ex-West Ham striker Tony Cottee has slammed the club for failing to sort out Sam Allardyce’s future at the club.

The Hammers boss’ contract is due to finish at the end of the current campaign, but co-owners David Gold and David Sullivan are yet to offer him a new deal, claiming they will only enter talks once their Premier League safety is secured.

But Cottee believes that this will only have a negative effect on the Upton Park outfit's fortunes.

He told Hawksbee and Jacobs: “I don’t think it achieves anything at the moment. Sam came into the club at a time when they needed stability.

“They needed to get out of the Championship after the debacle of Avram Grant and his job was to get them promoted. He did that and did it very well.

“They’ve been very stable in the Premier League up until the last month or so, and I think Sam has done a good job.

“I don’t go along with, ‘we’re waiting to see what happens’, because the club needs stability and you need a manager to take the club forward.

“It doesn’t help the manager and Neil McDonald, the assistant manager. They haven’t been given contracts. They’ve not even had talks and that doesn’t help the management and I think that can filter down to the players as well.

“If you’re trying to get a player to sign a new contract, a player will say, ‘hold on, I don’t know if the manager is going to be here’.”
Exclusive - Tony Cottee blasts West Ham as they stall on a new contract for Sam Allardyce By Anton Stanley Monday, February 11, 2013 Ex-West Ham striker Tony Cottee has slammed the club for failing to sort out Sam Allardyce’s future at the club. The Hammers boss’ contract is due to finish at the end of the current campaign, but co-owners David Gold and David Sullivan are yet to offer him a new deal, claiming they will only enter talks once their Premier League safety is secured. But Cottee believes that this will only have a negative effect on the Upton Park outfit's fortunes. He told Hawksbee and Jacobs: “I don’t think it achieves anything at the moment. Sam came into the club at a time when they needed stability. “They needed to get out of the Championship after the debacle of Avram Grant and his job was to get them promoted. He did that and did it very well. “They’ve been very stable in the Premier League up until the last month or so, and I think Sam has done a good job. “I don’t go along with, ‘we’re waiting to see what happens’, because the club needs stability and you need a manager to take the club forward. “It doesn’t help the manager and Neil McDonald, the assistant manager. They haven’t been given contracts. They’ve not even had talks and that doesn’t help the management and I think that can filter down to the players as well. “If you’re trying to get a player to sign a new contract, a player will say, ‘hold on, I don’t know if the manager is going to be here’.” smirg kcab
  • Score: 0

5:49pm Mon 11 Feb 13

DarrenSTFCRomain says...

Steve. Brentford wrote:
SAPFanSTFC wrote:
DarrenSTFCRomain wrote:
Steve. Brentford wrote:
DarrenSTFCRomain wrote:
SAPFanSTFC wrote:
London Red wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)
So what was they doing that was so bad.. WAS THEY DRINKING AND LAUGHING ? What was they doing that makes them the wrong people to put there money in 2 STFC... I was not there so please tell
I heard they were ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^Wait for it Dazza ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** *************Smiling .AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA what a bunch of ********** a mate
NO was they !!!!! What a bunch of donald duckers... ITS JUST NOT ON NOT ON I TELL YOU NOT ON
No doubt you'll both be laughing early next season!...Would love to say what I think of you both at this critical point in the progress of STFC but being honest - I'm better than that. ... So glad you both think you're so clever...just shows what you really think....I just hope you're not realising that you missed the one critical point where Jock and I actually agreed....was actually right!?... . ....Because we WON't BE HAPPY AT BEING RIGHT!!!...even Napolean had more common sense than you two!! .... So many of you think it is a personal journey to the 'I Was Right!' brigade yet you fail to see that SOME people actually care as much as you and have gone from being 110% positive about this whole sale to being...well pretty darned sh1tless! ... But don't let the facts bother you eh!? ... I'm outta here and not going to bother reading the drivvel from you two either....thought you were better and more commonsensical than that - but nope back into the cupboard eh!?
Why don't you calm yourself down a little bit i/we were just making best of of bad situation,SAP i don't think you are in the right frame of mind to be replying to two long time posters who don't have a dig at you over your opinions whether i totally agree with you or not but don't take things so personal i never abused you so why do you think it`s ok to do so to me,couldn't you reply in a more constructive way,since when have i ever had any serious conversation`s with Darren,i reckon you need to calm down and save any offencive postings for people who are being offencive to you.
since when have i ever had any serious conversation`s with Darren

THANKS A LOT !!!!! MATE..
That really hurt ??
[quote][p][bold]Steve. Brentford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SAPFanSTFC[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DarrenSTFCRomain[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve. Brentford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DarrenSTFCRomain[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SAPFanSTFC[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)[/p][/quote]So what was they doing that was so bad.. WAS THEY DRINKING AND LAUGHING ? What was they doing that makes them the wrong people to put there money in 2 STFC... I was not there so please tell[/p][/quote]I heard they were ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^Wait for it Dazza ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** *************Smiling .AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA what a bunch of ********** a mate[/p][/quote]NO was they !!!!! What a bunch of donald duckers... ITS JUST NOT ON NOT ON I TELL YOU NOT ON[/p][/quote]No doubt you'll both be laughing early next season!...Would love to say what I think of you both at this critical point in the progress of STFC but being honest - I'm better than that. ... So glad you both think you're so clever...just shows what you really think....I just hope you're not realising that you missed the one critical point where Jock and I actually agreed....was actually right!?... . ....Because we WON't BE HAPPY AT BEING RIGHT!!!...even Napolean had more common sense than you two!! .... So many of you think it is a personal journey to the 'I Was Right!' brigade yet you fail to see that SOME people actually care as much as you and have gone from being 110% positive about this whole sale to being...well pretty darned sh1tless! ... But don't let the facts bother you eh!? ... I'm outta here and not going to bother reading the drivvel from you two either....thought you were better and more commonsensical than that - but nope back into the cupboard eh!?[/p][/quote]Why don't you calm yourself down a little bit i/we were just making best of of bad situation,SAP i don't think you are in the right frame of mind to be replying to two long time posters who don't have a dig at you over your opinions whether i totally agree with you or not but don't take things so personal i never abused you so why do you think it`s ok to do so to me,couldn't you reply in a more constructive way,since when have i ever had any serious conversation`s with Darren,i reckon you need to calm down and save any offencive postings for people who are being offencive to you.[/p][/quote]since when have i ever had any serious conversation`s with Darren THANKS A LOT !!!!! MATE.. That really hurt ?? DarrenSTFCRomain
  • Score: 0

5:50pm Mon 11 Feb 13

DarrenSTFCRomain says...

SAPFanSTFC wrote:
DarrenSTFCRomain wrote:
Steve. Brentford wrote:
DarrenSTFCRomain wrote:
SAPFanSTFC wrote:
London Red wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe
LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)
So what was they doing that was so bad.. WAS THEY DRINKING AND LAUGHING ? What was they doing that makes them the wrong people to put there money in 2 STFC... I was not there so please tell
I heard they were ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^Wait for it Dazza ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** *************Smiling .AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA what a bunch of ********** a mate
NO was they !!!!! What a bunch of donald duckers... ITS JUST NOT ON NOT ON I TELL YOU NOT ON
No doubt you'll both be laughing early next season!...Would love to say what I think of you both at this critical point in the progress of STFC but being honest - I'm better than that. ... So glad you both think you're so clever...just shows what you really think....I just hope you're not realising that you missed the one critical point where Jock and I actually agreed....was actually right!?... . ....Because we WON't BE HAPPY AT BEING RIGHT!!!...even Napolean had more common sense than you two!! .... So many of you think it is a personal journey to the 'I Was Right!' brigade yet you fail to see that SOME people actually care as much as you and have gone from being 110% positive about this whole sale to being...well pretty darned sh1tless! ... But don't let the facts bother you eh!? ... I'm outta here and not going to bother reading the drivvel from you two either....thought you were better and more commonsensical than that - but nope back into the cupboard eh!?
No doubt you'll both be laughing early next season!...
WHAT ??..

Would love to say what I think of you both at this critical point in the progress of STFC but being honest - I'm better than that.

OR COULD IT BE THAT YOUR JUST LIKE ME..
DONT NO ANYTHING.?????

Sorry sapf but what are you on 2day..
I YOU asked what happened....

WHAT DO YOU NO ABOUT THE NEW BOARD that we dont?????.
The same as me nothing....
Unless you know them

ANYWAY.
WHAT DID HAPPEN THEN...
[quote][p][bold]SAPFanSTFC[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DarrenSTFCRomain[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve. Brentford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DarrenSTFCRomain[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SAPFanSTFC[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]London Red[/bold] wrote: Will people either put up or shut up! . If you know something say it - if not don't bother with the I know something you don't type comments . I know SAP and Jock are not like Guv - but recent posts fall into the same category . It can't be that confidential that it has been shared with people already - so say WHAT you heard not who from and we can then all make our own minds up if we want to believe it or be worried about it - whatever it maybe[/p][/quote]LR - You have to remember I'm in the Members Lounge and witnessed it of my own accord plus checked with others to make sure it was them. ... As mentioned I'm hoping it was purely Jed and a few of his mates and not the full board....REALLY hoping!! ... No I won't mention names as people's jobs depend on what they say to who and I for one am not going to blab their names about the place - suffice to say that they're people we see week in week out at the County Ground and NO we don't see the Tea Lady!!!...She's too busy talking to others!! :-) ... I was all excited and all for it - I'm now VERY well grounded and not aiming for the stars at present.....I'll settle for a day trip to Bognor Regis at the moment! :-)[/p][/quote]So what was they doing that was so bad.. WAS THEY DRINKING AND LAUGHING ? What was they doing that makes them the wrong people to put there money in 2 STFC... I was not there so please tell[/p][/quote]I heard they were ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^Wait for it Dazza ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** ******************** *************Smiling .AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA what a bunch of ********** a mate[/p][/quote]NO was they !!!!! What a bunch of donald duckers... ITS JUST NOT ON NOT ON I TELL YOU NOT ON[/p][/quote]No doubt you'll both be laughing early next season!...Would love to say what I think of you both at this critical point in the progress of STFC but being honest - I'm better than that. ... So glad you both think you're so clever...just shows what you really think....I just hope you're not realising that you missed the one critical point where Jock and I actually agreed....was actually right!?... . ....Because we WON't BE HAPPY AT BEING RIGHT!!!...even Napolean had more common sense than you two!! .... So many of you think it is a personal journey to the 'I Was Right!' brigade yet you fail to see that SOME people actually care as much as you and have gone from being 110% positive about this whole sale to being...well pretty darned sh1tless! ... But don't let the facts bother you eh!? ... I'm outta here and not going to bother reading the drivvel from you two either....thought you were better and more commonsensical than that - but nope back into the cupboard eh!?[/p][/quote]No doubt you'll both be laughing early next season!... WHAT ??.. Would love to say what I think of you both at this critical point in the progress of STFC but being honest - I'm better than that. OR COULD IT BE THAT YOUR JUST LIKE ME.. DONT NO ANYTHING.????? Sorry sapf but what are you on 2day.. I YOU asked what happened.... WHAT DO YOU NO ABOUT THE NEW BOARD that we dont?????. The same as me nothing.... Unless you know them ANYWAY. WHAT DID HAPPEN THEN... DarrenSTFCRomain
  • Score: 0

5:58pm Mon 11 Feb 13

multipostingshouldbebanned says...

I was NOT going to add anything to my original post but feel it is only right to explain a couple of things.

Although I have been active on this forum for around 12 months, like many I read more than I contribute.

I am NOT one of the "regulars", and only make this point so you know who you are NOT dealing with.

I was NOT nor am I claiming that the content of the original posts was poor, in fact many are very well written some of which I agree with and some I don't.

I am however, tired of the one-upmanship that is frequently displayed (who has seen who first in the lounge or who has said what to who-but I can't tell you are prime examples).

It is abundantly clear that there are a great many posters on here who make good arguments backed up with valid points and/or facts and figures etc, but get few if any comments on their posting no matter how well constructed.

Yet the "Clique" few take over the forum with their constant NEED to be heard or seen by quoting and re-quoting then bu99er me if they don't re-quote the re-quote just to say "DITTO" FFS.

Which brings me back to my original point that if those on whos head the cap fits were to assume a new identity it would take considerably less time for us mere mortals to scroll down and read some interesting points from other contributors.

Further, it is quite clear to me that Jockster has realized the error of his ways by virtue of his 3.36pm post. (Please don't try to deny it....what can't speak can't lie).
Yet Steve.Brentford completely missed the point.

Oh Well....Villages and their Idiots!!
I was NOT going to add anything to my original post but feel it is only right to explain a couple of things. Although I have been active on this forum for around 12 months, like many I read more than I contribute. I am NOT one of the "regulars", and only make this point so you know who you are NOT dealing with. I was NOT nor am I claiming that the content of the original posts was poor, in fact many are very well written some of which I agree with and some I don't. I am however, tired of the one-upmanship that is frequently displayed (who has seen who first in the lounge or who has said what to who-but I can't tell you are prime examples). It is abundantly clear that there are a great many posters on here who make good arguments backed up with valid points and/or facts and figures etc, but get few if any comments on their posting no matter how well constructed. Yet the "Clique" few take over the forum with their constant NEED to be heard or seen by quoting and re-quoting then bu99er me if they don't re-quote the re-quote just to say "DITTO" FFS. Which brings me back to my original point that if those on whos head the cap fits were to assume a new identity it would take considerably less time for us mere mortals to scroll down and read some interesting points from other contributors. Further, it is quite clear to me that Jockster has realized the error of his ways by virtue of his 3.36pm post. (Please don't try to deny it....what can't speak can't lie). Yet Steve.Brentford completely missed the point. Oh Well....Villages and their Idiots!! multipostingshouldbebanned
  • Score: 0

6:12pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Steve. Brentford says...

multipostingshouldbe
banned
wrote:
I was NOT going to add anything to my original post but feel it is only right to explain a couple of things.

Although I have been active on this forum for around 12 months, like many I read more than I contribute.

I am NOT one of the "regulars", and only make this point so you know who you are NOT dealing with.

I was NOT nor am I claiming that the content of the original posts was poor, in fact many are very well written some of which I agree with and some I don't.

I am however, tired of the one-upmanship that is frequently displayed (who has seen who first in the lounge or who has said what to who-but I can't tell you are prime examples).

It is abundantly clear that there are a great many posters on here who make good arguments backed up with valid points and/or facts and figures etc, but get few if any comments on their posting no matter how well constructed.

Yet the "Clique" few take over the forum with their constant NEED to be heard or seen by quoting and re-quoting then bu99er me if they don't re-quote the re-quote just to say "DITTO" FFS.

Which brings me back to my original point that if those on whos head the cap fits were to assume a new identity it would take considerably less time for us mere mortals to scroll down and read some interesting points from other contributors.

Further, it is quite clear to me that Jockster has realized the error of his ways by virtue of his 3.36pm post. (Please don't try to deny it....what can't speak can't lie).
Yet Steve.Brentford completely missed the point.

Oh Well....Villages and their Idiots!!
I never missed the point.Just why not write this under your original user-name,you might of got a different response,(maybe)
Ditto everything you have said.
Top post.
I agree.
bravo.
PS what village do you come from?
PPS i have quoted your quote just to show you,i never missed your point,do you use your phone to post on here by the way.
[quote][p][bold]multipostingshouldbe banned[/bold] wrote: I was NOT going to add anything to my original post but feel it is only right to explain a couple of things. Although I have been active on this forum for around 12 months, like many I read more than I contribute. I am NOT one of the "regulars", and only make this point so you know who you are NOT dealing with. I was NOT nor am I claiming that the content of the original posts was poor, in fact many are very well written some of which I agree with and some I don't. I am however, tired of the one-upmanship that is frequently displayed (who has seen who first in the lounge or who has said what to who-but I can't tell you are prime examples). It is abundantly clear that there are a great many posters on here who make good arguments backed up with valid points and/or facts and figures etc, but get few if any comments on their posting no matter how well constructed. Yet the "Clique" few take over the forum with their constant NEED to be heard or seen by quoting and re-quoting then bu99er me if they don't re-quote the re-quote just to say "DITTO" FFS. Which brings me back to my original point that if those on whos head the cap fits were to assume a new identity it would take considerably less time for us mere mortals to scroll down and read some interesting points from other contributors. Further, it is quite clear to me that Jockster has realized the error of his ways by virtue of his 3.36pm post. (Please don't try to deny it....what can't speak can't lie). Yet Steve.Brentford completely missed the point. Oh Well....Villages and their Idiots!![/p][/quote]I never missed the point.Just why not write this under your original user-name,you might of got a different response,(maybe) Ditto everything you have said. Top post. I agree. bravo. PS what village do you come from? PPS i have quoted your quote just to show you,i never missed your point,do you use your phone to post on here by the way. Steve. Brentford
  • Score: 0

6:16pm Mon 11 Feb 13

hornet says...

What I love about these comments is things like

Paolo wants this and Paolo wants that Paolo will leave , look at Paolo,s reaction he is defiantly going

Know one has any idea what goes on in Paolo's head not even Paolo

So sit back relax what will be will be
What I love about these comments is things like Paolo wants this and Paolo wants that Paolo will leave , look at Paolo,s reaction he is defiantly going Know one has any idea what goes on in Paolo's head not even Paolo So sit back relax what will be will be hornet
  • Score: 0

6:40pm Mon 11 Feb 13

multipostingshouldbebanned says...

Steve.Brentford,
If I judged you incorrectly then I apologise.

The reason I have posted in this manner is because I knew there would be one or two that would take it personally and start throwing out abuse.

Then once that starts the message I was trying to get across gets lost.

It happens all too often, so by posting in this manner I am able to say what I think (politely), without falling out with people.
Steve.Brentford, If I judged you incorrectly then I apologise. The reason I have posted in this manner is because I knew there would be one or two that would take it personally and start throwing out abuse. Then once that starts the message I was trying to get across gets lost. It happens all too often, so by posting in this manner I am able to say what I think (politely), without falling out with people. multipostingshouldbebanned
  • Score: 0

6:56pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Steve. Brentford says...

Multi, not a problem,just don't take things on here to heart,we are all Town fans after all and i hope you find others a little more accommodating in future.
Multi, not a problem,just don't take things on here to heart,we are all Town fans after all and i hope you find others a little more accommodating in future. Steve. Brentford
  • Score: 0

6:56pm Mon 11 Feb 13

avo says...

a softly softly approach eh?
.
didn't work tho.
.
Ah well, sideways and diagonally...
a softly softly approach eh? . didn't work tho. . Ah well, sideways and diagonally... avo
  • Score: 0

7:10pm Mon 11 Feb 13

ciclosporindorset says...

Getting a bit steamy on here today. Must say - I cannot understand why you would want a nomme de plume and then a second one just to disguise your nomme de plume. Seems a bit overkill. There used to be the "rose coloured spectacle brigade" of which I was one. Now we have a slit your wrist its a no news day brigade - of which I am not one. However - I do relate to the notion that it can get a bit clubby. Thats probably because I feel a bit marginalised by my nutty comments. Never mind tho eh! We all want the club to do well and I confess I have not attended every town game in the past 55 years - unlike some. God forbid if the new prospectives are a bunch of chavs tho - or does it matter if their money is good.
Getting a bit steamy on here today. Must say - I cannot understand why you would want a nomme de plume and then a second one just to disguise your nomme de plume. Seems a bit overkill. There used to be the "rose coloured spectacle brigade" of which I was one. Now we have a slit your wrist its a no news day brigade - of which I am not one. However - I do relate to the notion that it can get a bit clubby. Thats probably because I feel a bit marginalised by my nutty comments. Never mind tho eh! We all want the club to do well and I confess I have not attended every town game in the past 55 years - unlike some. God forbid if the new prospectives are a bunch of chavs tho - or does it matter if their money is good. ciclosporindorset
  • Score: 0

7:21pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

I think what we need is a sign in/ registration page for each thread and then if those that have the moral high ground on here feel you are worthy of posting then you can continue. Be warned if you fail to agree with or post a derogatory comment you will be evicted from the FREE DEBATE and you will need to eat severe humble pie before you will given the right to post again
I think what we need is a sign in/ registration page for each thread and then if those that have the moral high ground on here feel you are worthy of posting then you can continue. Be warned if you fail to agree with or post a derogatory comment you will be evicted from the FREE DEBATE and you will need to eat severe humble pie before you will given the right to post again spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

7:22pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Steve. Brentford says...

Dorset,you are sooo articulate,you are epic,"does it matter if their money is good" that answer will differ to who you ask.
Other things like do they have the money to sustain our current boards targets and are they in it for the long term,in-fact too many questions lay unanswered but as there is little us mere mortals can do but wait,then that`s what i will do with my fingers crossed.
Dorset,you are sooo articulate,you are epic,"does it matter if their money is good" that answer will differ to who you ask. Other things like do they have the money to sustain our current boards targets and are they in it for the long term,in-fact too many questions lay unanswered but as there is little us mere mortals can do but wait,then that`s what i will do with my fingers crossed. Steve. Brentford
  • Score: 0

7:23pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
I think what we need is a sign in/ registration page for each thread and then if those that have the moral high ground on here feel you are worthy of posting then you can continue. Be warned if you fail to agree with or post a derogatory comment you will be evicted from the FREE DEBATE and you will need to eat severe humble pie before you will given the right to post again
So judging on my post above pleeeeeease can i enter the chat room and add to the debate? Promise i will agree to anything the usual suspects post. I wouldnt dream of causing friction and i am overwhelmed to be in such company.
[quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: I think what we need is a sign in/ registration page for each thread and then if those that have the moral high ground on here feel you are worthy of posting then you can continue. Be warned if you fail to agree with or post a derogatory comment you will be evicted from the FREE DEBATE and you will need to eat severe humble pie before you will given the right to post again[/p][/quote]So judging on my post above pleeeeeease can i enter the chat room and add to the debate? Promise i will agree to anything the usual suspects post. I wouldnt dream of causing friction and i am overwhelmed to be in such company. spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

7:37pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Oxon-Red says...

I do find the West Ham statement interesting. Has there been contact with Paolo ?

He was mentioned by a West Ham fan on 606 at the week-end !

I said before that I felt Paolo has nothing now to lose by staying. In fact he has a lot to gain if we get promoted.

Were his waves on Saturday to say goodbye if things don't pan out over the next few days ?

I would like to think they were but that he will stay to see the season out if he is able to bring players in. New loan players are something which is essential if the club is serious about going up as the squad is no longer strong enough to cope with any more injuries/suspensions
.

Time will tell of course but, "good things come to those who wait" !

COYMR
I do find the West Ham statement interesting. Has there been contact with Paolo ? He was mentioned by a West Ham fan on 606 at the week-end ! I said before that I felt Paolo has nothing now to lose by staying. In fact he has a lot to gain if we get promoted. Were his waves on Saturday to say goodbye if things don't pan out over the next few days ? I would like to think they were but that he will stay to see the season out if he is able to bring players in. New loan players are something which is essential if the club is serious about going up as the squad is no longer strong enough to cope with any more injuries/suspensions . Time will tell of course but, "good things come to those who wait" ! COYMR Oxon-Red
  • Score: 0

7:58pm Mon 11 Feb 13

swindon1969 says...

MITTED wrote:
Paolo for Pope? He is already a god, why would he step down a level? :o)

COYR

Better pay”

The pope is unpaid in his post,as head of the church.
MITTED wrote: Paolo for Pope? He is already a god, why would he step down a level? :o) COYR Better pay” The pope is unpaid in his post,as head of the church. swindon1969
  • Score: 0

7:59pm Mon 11 Feb 13

mancrobin says...

multipostingshouldbe
banned
wrote:
I was NOT going to add anything to my original post but feel it is only right to explain a couple of things.

Although I have been active on this forum for around 12 months, like many I read more than I contribute.

I am NOT one of the "regulars", and only make this point so you know who you are NOT dealing with.

I was NOT nor am I claiming that the content of the original posts was poor, in fact many are very well written some of which I agree with and some I don't.

I am however, tired of the one-upmanship that is frequently displayed (who has seen who first in the lounge or who has said what to who-but I can't tell you are prime examples).

It is abundantly clear that there are a great many posters on here who make good arguments backed up with valid points and/or facts and figures etc, but get few if any comments on their posting no matter how well constructed.

Yet the "Clique" few take over the forum with their constant NEED to be heard or seen by quoting and re-quoting then bu99er me if they don't re-quote the re-quote just to say "DITTO" FFS.

Which brings me back to my original point that if those on whos head the cap fits were to assume a new identity it would take considerably less time for us mere mortals to scroll down and read some interesting points from other contributors.

Further, it is quite clear to me that Jockster has realized the error of his ways by virtue of his 3.36pm post. (Please don't try to deny it....what can't speak can't lie).
Yet Steve.Brentford completely missed the point.

Oh Well....Villages and their Idiots!!
I'm struggling to see the point to this as we all have a choice whether to read the posts or make our own.

I guess that the reason why I bother to do this is because it fulfils a need. In the old days, Town fans didn't live in Mallorca, Brentford or Manchester. They lived in Swindon or thereabouts and could go down the local pub and swap opinions/argue/specu
late over a pint or two. And I'd bet you'd find that little habits, cliques, hierarchies would emerge.... You know the sort, the one who would come in an hour before closing time, demands the seat by the fire and talks b@llocks about how Fleming is the worst striker we've ever had.

So, my friend, if you don't like the Adver Arms, I'm sure there's another pub up the road that can provide some alternative chat.
[quote][p][bold]multipostingshouldbe banned[/bold] wrote: I was NOT going to add anything to my original post but feel it is only right to explain a couple of things. Although I have been active on this forum for around 12 months, like many I read more than I contribute. I am NOT one of the "regulars", and only make this point so you know who you are NOT dealing with. I was NOT nor am I claiming that the content of the original posts was poor, in fact many are very well written some of which I agree with and some I don't. I am however, tired of the one-upmanship that is frequently displayed (who has seen who first in the lounge or who has said what to who-but I can't tell you are prime examples). It is abundantly clear that there are a great many posters on here who make good arguments backed up with valid points and/or facts and figures etc, but get few if any comments on their posting no matter how well constructed. Yet the "Clique" few take over the forum with their constant NEED to be heard or seen by quoting and re-quoting then bu99er me if they don't re-quote the re-quote just to say "DITTO" FFS. Which brings me back to my original point that if those on whos head the cap fits were to assume a new identity it would take considerably less time for us mere mortals to scroll down and read some interesting points from other contributors. Further, it is quite clear to me that Jockster has realized the error of his ways by virtue of his 3.36pm post. (Please don't try to deny it....what can't speak can't lie). Yet Steve.Brentford completely missed the point. Oh Well....Villages and their Idiots!![/p][/quote]I'm struggling to see the point to this as we all have a choice whether to read the posts or make our own. I guess that the reason why I bother to do this is because it fulfils a need. In the old days, Town fans didn't live in Mallorca, Brentford or Manchester. They lived in Swindon or thereabouts and could go down the local pub and swap opinions/argue/specu late over a pint or two. And I'd bet you'd find that little habits, cliques, hierarchies would emerge.... You know the sort, the one who would come in an hour before closing time, demands the seat by the fire and talks b@llocks about how Fleming is the worst striker we've ever had. So, my friend, if you don't like the Adver Arms, I'm sure there's another pub up the road that can provide some alternative chat. mancrobin
  • Score: 0

8:02pm Mon 11 Feb 13

louiscassius says...

spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
I think what we need is a sign in/ registration page for each thread and then if those that have the moral high ground on here feel you are worthy of posting then you can continue. Be warned if you fail to agree with or post a derogatory comment you will be evicted from the FREE DEBATE and you will need to eat severe humble pie before you will given the right to post again
So judging on my post above pleeeeeease can i enter the chat room and add to the debate? Promise i will agree to anything the usual suspects post. I wouldnt dream of causing friction and i am overwhelmed to be in such company.
Hi buddy,

Give us a call if you got 5 mate.

Cheers

Louis
[quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: I think what we need is a sign in/ registration page for each thread and then if those that have the moral high ground on here feel you are worthy of posting then you can continue. Be warned if you fail to agree with or post a derogatory comment you will be evicted from the FREE DEBATE and you will need to eat severe humble pie before you will given the right to post again[/p][/quote]So judging on my post above pleeeeeease can i enter the chat room and add to the debate? Promise i will agree to anything the usual suspects post. I wouldnt dream of causing friction and i am overwhelmed to be in such company.[/p][/quote]Hi buddy, Give us a call if you got 5 mate. Cheers Louis louiscassius
  • Score: 0

8:03pm Mon 11 Feb 13

The Jockster says...

Multi - there are parts of your argument that I so have sympathy with - I do agree that the "re-quote" option on occasions is over used and is by enlarged done through laziness rather than saying like you have said xxxxx re your 2.00pm post etc... This would be better than endless scrolling when all respondents hit the quote button to comment on what amounts to an encyclopaedia to start with. However the counter argument is that by doing so it makes it easier to respond to the originators comments.

Now mindful of relative brevity I initially failed to see why you chose to hide behind another alias as Ciclo says totally pointless until I read your final remark quote " oh well villages and their idiots" Hardly a comment likely to endear you to your fellow posters either the ones you have targeted to criticise or those who you seek to get some credibility from. Lets hope your alter ego is a tad more charitable with his/her? comments.
Multi - there are parts of your argument that I so have sympathy with - I do agree that the "re-quote" option on occasions is over used and is by enlarged done through laziness rather than saying like you have said xxxxx re your 2.00pm post etc... This would be better than endless scrolling when all respondents hit the quote button to comment on what amounts to an encyclopaedia to start with. However the counter argument is that by doing so it makes it easier to respond to the originators comments. Now mindful of relative brevity I initially failed to see why you chose to hide behind another alias as Ciclo says totally pointless until I read your final remark quote " oh well villages and their idiots" Hardly a comment likely to endear you to your fellow posters either the ones you have targeted to criticise or those who you seek to get some credibility from. Lets hope your alter ego is a tad more charitable with his/her? comments. The Jockster
  • Score: 0

8:11pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

louiscassius wrote:
spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
I think what we need is a sign in/ registration page for each thread and then if those that have the moral high ground on here feel you are worthy of posting then you can continue. Be warned if you fail to agree with or post a derogatory comment you will be evicted from the FREE DEBATE and you will need to eat severe humble pie before you will given the right to post again
So judging on my post above pleeeeeease can i enter the chat room and add to the debate? Promise i will agree to anything the usual suspects post. I wouldnt dream of causing friction and i am overwhelmed to be in such company.
Hi buddy,

Give us a call if you got 5 mate.

Cheers

Louis
Loius,

Hows things bud? I cannot call as my phone will allow browsing etc but not calls.
Whats up mate hows work?
Im off this week thinking we had a game typical back next week so miss Tranny away god i love a good Tranny!!!
[quote][p][bold]louiscassius[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: I think what we need is a sign in/ registration page for each thread and then if those that have the moral high ground on here feel you are worthy of posting then you can continue. Be warned if you fail to agree with or post a derogatory comment you will be evicted from the FREE DEBATE and you will need to eat severe humble pie before you will given the right to post again[/p][/quote]So judging on my post above pleeeeeease can i enter the chat room and add to the debate? Promise i will agree to anything the usual suspects post. I wouldnt dream of causing friction and i am overwhelmed to be in such company.[/p][/quote]Hi buddy, Give us a call if you got 5 mate. Cheers Louis[/p][/quote]Loius, Hows things bud? I cannot call as my phone will allow browsing etc but not calls. Whats up mate hows work? Im off this week thinking we had a game typical back next week so miss Tranny away god i love a good Tranny!!! spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

8:15pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

The Jockster wrote:
Multi - there are parts of your argument that I so have sympathy with - I do agree that the "re-quote" option on occasions is over used and is by enlarged done through laziness rather than saying like you have said xxxxx re your 2.00pm post etc... This would be better than endless scrolling when all respondents hit the quote button to comment on what amounts to an encyclopaedia to start with. However the counter argument is that by doing so it makes it easier to respond to the originators comments.

Now mindful of relative brevity I initially failed to see why you chose to hide behind another alias as Ciclo says totally pointless until I read your final remark quote " oh well villages and their idiots" Hardly a comment likely to endear you to your fellow posters either the ones you have targeted to criticise or those who you seek to get some credibility from. Lets hope your alter ego is a tad more charitable with his/her? comments.
Totally agree on the quote front they tend to drag on and the page is then made soooo much longer!!!!!!
However i must admit there are a couple of villages that surely have registered missing people.
[quote][p][bold]The Jockster[/bold] wrote: Multi - there are parts of your argument that I so have sympathy with - I do agree that the "re-quote" option on occasions is over used and is by enlarged done through laziness rather than saying like you have said xxxxx re your 2.00pm post etc... This would be better than endless scrolling when all respondents hit the quote button to comment on what amounts to an encyclopaedia to start with. However the counter argument is that by doing so it makes it easier to respond to the originators comments. Now mindful of relative brevity I initially failed to see why you chose to hide behind another alias as Ciclo says totally pointless until I read your final remark quote " oh well villages and their idiots" Hardly a comment likely to endear you to your fellow posters either the ones you have targeted to criticise or those who you seek to get some credibility from. Lets hope your alter ego is a tad more charitable with his/her? comments.[/p][/quote]Totally agree on the quote front they tend to drag on and the page is then made soooo much longer!!!!!! However i must admit there are a couple of villages that surely have registered missing people. spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

8:16pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
The Jockster wrote:
Multi - there are parts of your argument that I so have sympathy with - I do agree that the "re-quote" option on occasions is over used and is by enlarged done through laziness rather than saying like you have said xxxxx re your 2.00pm post etc... This would be better than endless scrolling when all respondents hit the quote button to comment on what amounts to an encyclopaedia to start with. However the counter argument is that by doing so it makes it easier to respond to the originators comments.

Now mindful of relative brevity I initially failed to see why you chose to hide behind another alias as Ciclo says totally pointless until I read your final remark quote " oh well villages and their idiots" Hardly a comment likely to endear you to your fellow posters either the ones you have targeted to criticise or those who you seek to get some credibility from. Lets hope your alter ego is a tad more charitable with his/her? comments.
Totally agree on the quote front they tend to drag on and the page is then made soooo much longer!!!!!!
However i must admit there are a couple of villages that surely have registered missing people.
This is what i mean agreeing about continual quoting sometimes its pointless just to agree, do you agree?
[quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]The Jockster[/bold] wrote: Multi - there are parts of your argument that I so have sympathy with - I do agree that the "re-quote" option on occasions is over used and is by enlarged done through laziness rather than saying like you have said xxxxx re your 2.00pm post etc... This would be better than endless scrolling when all respondents hit the quote button to comment on what amounts to an encyclopaedia to start with. However the counter argument is that by doing so it makes it easier to respond to the originators comments. Now mindful of relative brevity I initially failed to see why you chose to hide behind another alias as Ciclo says totally pointless until I read your final remark quote " oh well villages and their idiots" Hardly a comment likely to endear you to your fellow posters either the ones you have targeted to criticise or those who you seek to get some credibility from. Lets hope your alter ego is a tad more charitable with his/her? comments.[/p][/quote]Totally agree on the quote front they tend to drag on and the page is then made soooo much longer!!!!!! However i must admit there are a couple of villages that surely have registered missing people.[/p][/quote]This is what i mean agreeing about continual quoting sometimes its pointless just to agree, do you agree? spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

8:18pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
The Jockster wrote:
Multi - there are parts of your argument that I so have sympathy with - I do agree that the "re-quote" option on occasions is over used and is by enlarged done through laziness rather than saying like you have said xxxxx re your 2.00pm post etc... This would be better than endless scrolling when all respondents hit the quote button to comment on what amounts to an encyclopaedia to start with. However the counter argument is that by doing so it makes it easier to respond to the originators comments.

Now mindful of relative brevity I initially failed to see why you chose to hide behind another alias as Ciclo says totally pointless until I read your final remark quote " oh well villages and their idiots" Hardly a comment likely to endear you to your fellow posters either the ones you have targeted to criticise or those who you seek to get some credibility from. Lets hope your alter ego is a tad more charitable with his/her? comments.
Totally agree on the quote front they tend to drag on and the page is then made soooo much longer!!!!!!
However i must admit there are a couple of villages that surely have registered missing people.
This is what i mean agreeing about continual quoting sometimes its pointless just to agree, do you agree?
But then again if you quote at least people know what it is youre opposed to, do you see what i mean?
[quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]The Jockster[/bold] wrote: Multi - there are parts of your argument that I so have sympathy with - I do agree that the "re-quote" option on occasions is over used and is by enlarged done through laziness rather than saying like you have said xxxxx re your 2.00pm post etc... This would be better than endless scrolling when all respondents hit the quote button to comment on what amounts to an encyclopaedia to start with. However the counter argument is that by doing so it makes it easier to respond to the originators comments. Now mindful of relative brevity I initially failed to see why you chose to hide behind another alias as Ciclo says totally pointless until I read your final remark quote " oh well villages and their idiots" Hardly a comment likely to endear you to your fellow posters either the ones you have targeted to criticise or those who you seek to get some credibility from. Lets hope your alter ego is a tad more charitable with his/her? comments.[/p][/quote]Totally agree on the quote front they tend to drag on and the page is then made soooo much longer!!!!!! However i must admit there are a couple of villages that surely have registered missing people.[/p][/quote]This is what i mean agreeing about continual quoting sometimes its pointless just to agree, do you agree?[/p][/quote]But then again if you quote at least people know what it is youre opposed to, do you see what i mean? spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

8:19pm Mon 11 Feb 13

louiscassius says...

spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
louiscassius wrote:
spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
I think what we need is a sign in/ registration page for each thread and then if those that have the moral high ground on here feel you are worthy of posting then you can continue. Be warned if you fail to agree with or post a derogatory comment you will be evicted from the FREE DEBATE and you will need to eat severe humble pie before you will given the right to post again
So judging on my post above pleeeeeease can i enter the chat room and add to the debate? Promise i will agree to anything the usual suspects post. I wouldnt dream of causing friction and i am overwhelmed to be in such company.
Hi buddy,

Give us a call if you got 5 mate.

Cheers

Louis
Loius,

Hows things bud? I cannot call as my phone will allow browsing etc but not calls.
Whats up mate hows work?
Im off this week thinking we had a game typical back next week so miss Tranny away god i love a good Tranny!!!
Oh mate,

Sorry to hear that....you still fancy coming up??

Louis :-)))
[quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]louiscassius[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: I think what we need is a sign in/ registration page for each thread and then if those that have the moral high ground on here feel you are worthy of posting then you can continue. Be warned if you fail to agree with or post a derogatory comment you will be evicted from the FREE DEBATE and you will need to eat severe humble pie before you will given the right to post again[/p][/quote]So judging on my post above pleeeeeease can i enter the chat room and add to the debate? Promise i will agree to anything the usual suspects post. I wouldnt dream of causing friction and i am overwhelmed to be in such company.[/p][/quote]Hi buddy, Give us a call if you got 5 mate. Cheers Louis[/p][/quote]Loius, Hows things bud? I cannot call as my phone will allow browsing etc but not calls. Whats up mate hows work? Im off this week thinking we had a game typical back next week so miss Tranny away god i love a good Tranny!!![/p][/quote]Oh mate, Sorry to hear that....you still fancy coming up?? Louis :-))) louiscassius
  • Score: 0

8:22pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

louiscassius wrote:
spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
louiscassius wrote:
spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
I think what we need is a sign in/ registration page for each thread and then if those that have the moral high ground on here feel you are worthy of posting then you can continue. Be warned if you fail to agree with or post a derogatory comment you will be evicted from the FREE DEBATE and you will need to eat severe humble pie before you will given the right to post again
So judging on my post above pleeeeeease can i enter the chat room and add to the debate? Promise i will agree to anything the usual suspects post. I wouldnt dream of causing friction and i am overwhelmed to be in such company.
Hi buddy,

Give us a call if you got 5 mate.

Cheers

Louis
Loius,

Hows things bud? I cannot call as my phone will allow browsing etc but not calls.
Whats up mate hows work?
Im off this week thinking we had a game typical back next week so miss Tranny away god i love a good Tranny!!!
Oh mate,

Sorry to hear that....you still fancy coming up??

Louis :-)))
Yes mate defo,
You say when but Scunny or Donny must be best for you?
[quote][p][bold]louiscassius[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]louiscassius[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: I think what we need is a sign in/ registration page for each thread and then if those that have the moral high ground on here feel you are worthy of posting then you can continue. Be warned if you fail to agree with or post a derogatory comment you will be evicted from the FREE DEBATE and you will need to eat severe humble pie before you will given the right to post again[/p][/quote]So judging on my post above pleeeeeease can i enter the chat room and add to the debate? Promise i will agree to anything the usual suspects post. I wouldnt dream of causing friction and i am overwhelmed to be in such company.[/p][/quote]Hi buddy, Give us a call if you got 5 mate. Cheers Louis[/p][/quote]Loius, Hows things bud? I cannot call as my phone will allow browsing etc but not calls. Whats up mate hows work? Im off this week thinking we had a game typical back next week so miss Tranny away god i love a good Tranny!!![/p][/quote]Oh mate, Sorry to hear that....you still fancy coming up?? Louis :-)))[/p][/quote]Yes mate defo, You say when but Scunny or Donny must be best for you? spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

8:24pm Mon 11 Feb 13

louiscassius says...

spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
louiscassius wrote:
spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
louiscassius wrote:
spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
I think what we need is a sign in/ registration page for each thread and then if those that have the moral high ground on here feel you are worthy of posting then you can continue. Be warned if you fail to agree with or post a derogatory comment you will be evicted from the FREE DEBATE and you will need to eat severe humble pie before you will given the right to post again
So judging on my post above pleeeeeease can i enter the chat room and add to the debate? Promise i will agree to anything the usual suspects post. I wouldnt dream of causing friction and i am overwhelmed to be in such company.
Hi buddy,

Give us a call if you got 5 mate.

Cheers

Louis
Loius,

Hows things bud? I cannot call as my phone will allow browsing etc but not calls.
Whats up mate hows work?
Im off this week thinking we had a game typical back next week so miss Tranny away god i love a good Tranny!!!
Oh mate,

Sorry to hear that....you still fancy coming up??

Louis :-)))
Yes mate defo,
You say when but Scunny or Donny must be best for you?
Yes that would be best mate and we'll have a right old laugh.....be really nice to catch up......
[quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]louiscassius[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]louiscassius[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: I think what we need is a sign in/ registration page for each thread and then if those that have the moral high ground on here feel you are worthy of posting then you can continue. Be warned if you fail to agree with or post a derogatory comment you will be evicted from the FREE DEBATE and you will need to eat severe humble pie before you will given the right to post again[/p][/quote]So judging on my post above pleeeeeease can i enter the chat room and add to the debate? Promise i will agree to anything the usual suspects post. I wouldnt dream of causing friction and i am overwhelmed to be in such company.[/p][/quote]Hi buddy, Give us a call if you got 5 mate. Cheers Louis[/p][/quote]Loius, Hows things bud? I cannot call as my phone will allow browsing etc but not calls. Whats up mate hows work? Im off this week thinking we had a game typical back next week so miss Tranny away god i love a good Tranny!!![/p][/quote]Oh mate, Sorry to hear that....you still fancy coming up?? Louis :-)))[/p][/quote]Yes mate defo, You say when but Scunny or Donny must be best for you?[/p][/quote]Yes that would be best mate and we'll have a right old laugh.....be really nice to catch up...... louiscassius
  • Score: 0

8:31pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

louiscassius wrote:
spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
louiscassius wrote:
spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
louiscassius wrote:
spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
I think what we need is a sign in/ registration page for each thread and then if those that have the moral high ground on here feel you are worthy of posting then you can continue. Be warned if you fail to agree with or post a derogatory comment you will be evicted from the FREE DEBATE and you will need to eat severe humble pie before you will given the right to post again
So judging on my post above pleeeeeease can i enter the chat room and add to the debate? Promise i will agree to anything the usual suspects post. I wouldnt dream of causing friction and i am overwhelmed to be in such company.
Hi buddy,

Give us a call if you got 5 mate.

Cheers

Louis
Loius,

Hows things bud? I cannot call as my phone will allow browsing etc but not calls.
Whats up mate hows work?
Im off this week thinking we had a game typical back next week so miss Tranny away god i love a good Tranny!!!
Oh mate,

Sorry to hear that....you still fancy coming up??

Louis :-)))
Yes mate defo,
You say when but Scunny or Donny must be best for you?
Yes that would be best mate and we'll have a right old laugh.....be really nice to catch up......
Ok bud yeah be great, organise nearer the time sort some digs out and get on it i'll bring the good lady perhaps she could join us......... to drive!!!!!
Hey best stop all this quoting lark some folk on here get upset by it HAHA
[quote][p][bold]louiscassius[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]louiscassius[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]louiscassius[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: I think what we need is a sign in/ registration page for each thread and then if those that have the moral high ground on here feel you are worthy of posting then you can continue. Be warned if you fail to agree with or post a derogatory comment you will be evicted from the FREE DEBATE and you will need to eat severe humble pie before you will given the right to post again[/p][/quote]So judging on my post above pleeeeeease can i enter the chat room and add to the debate? Promise i will agree to anything the usual suspects post. I wouldnt dream of causing friction and i am overwhelmed to be in such company.[/p][/quote]Hi buddy, Give us a call if you got 5 mate. Cheers Louis[/p][/quote]Loius, Hows things bud? I cannot call as my phone will allow browsing etc but not calls. Whats up mate hows work? Im off this week thinking we had a game typical back next week so miss Tranny away god i love a good Tranny!!![/p][/quote]Oh mate, Sorry to hear that....you still fancy coming up?? Louis :-)))[/p][/quote]Yes mate defo, You say when but Scunny or Donny must be best for you?[/p][/quote]Yes that would be best mate and we'll have a right old laugh.....be really nice to catch up......[/p][/quote]Ok bud yeah be great, organise nearer the time sort some digs out and get on it i'll bring the good lady perhaps she could join us......... to drive!!!!! Hey best stop all this quoting lark some folk on here get upset by it HAHA spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

8:38pm Mon 11 Feb 13

multipostingshouldbebanned says...

Jockster,
I have to agree that the village idiot quip was unnecessary.

However to justify my desire to remain annonymous from my annonymous username (that sounds really stupid when I read it back), may I direct you to smirgs eloquent reply of 2.51pm.

Unfortunately that is his level.

That would have resulted in more name calling from both sides and had I posted under my usual name, I would have felt the need to not just defend the point I was trying to make but also my otherwise good name.

That is the only reason for posting the way I have.

Anyway, time to revert back to my preferred username.
Jockster, I have to agree that the village idiot quip was unnecessary. However to justify my desire to remain annonymous from my annonymous username (that sounds really stupid when I read it back), may I direct you to smirgs eloquent reply of 2.51pm. Unfortunately that is his level. That would have resulted in more name calling from both sides and had I posted under my usual name, I would have felt the need to not just defend the point I was trying to make but also my otherwise good name. That is the only reason for posting the way I have. Anyway, time to revert back to my preferred username. multipostingshouldbebanned
  • Score: 0

8:41pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

multipostingshouldbe
banned
wrote:
Jockster,
I have to agree that the village idiot quip was unnecessary.

However to justify my desire to remain annonymous from my annonymous username (that sounds really stupid when I read it back), may I direct you to smirgs eloquent reply of 2.51pm.

Unfortunately that is his level.

That would have resulted in more name calling from both sides and had I posted under my usual name, I would have felt the need to not just defend the point I was trying to make but also my otherwise good name.

That is the only reason for posting the way I have.

Anyway, time to revert back to my preferred username.
So apart from this post the next post on the thread will give us your true identity?
Knew i should have been plod!!
[quote][p][bold]multipostingshouldbe banned[/bold] wrote: Jockster, I have to agree that the village idiot quip was unnecessary. However to justify my desire to remain annonymous from my annonymous username (that sounds really stupid when I read it back), may I direct you to smirgs eloquent reply of 2.51pm. Unfortunately that is his level. That would have resulted in more name calling from both sides and had I posted under my usual name, I would have felt the need to not just defend the point I was trying to make but also my otherwise good name. That is the only reason for posting the way I have. Anyway, time to revert back to my preferred username.[/p][/quote]So apart from this post the next post on the thread will give us your true identity? Knew i should have been plod!! spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

8:50pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Di kanny oh says...

I see Benyon has gone full circle he is now back at Torquay for a month from Swindon reserves Saffend. I did notice our emergency loan of Cox to Plymouth is untill the rest of the season so does that mean we may be able to get the three signings on deadline day for the same deal. I thought the emergency loan was 93 days max or 3 months. Just a quick note to the Football League my paint has been dry for over two weeks now so what is your excuse. As a topic of discussion if Paolo were to leave then I would try and bring in Alan Curbishley who is a great manager at this level and above. I get the feeling the new board will tighten the funds if there are any that is and do not think Paolo will feel the ambition will be there. We do not know anything yet so who can predict the outcome but I do feel it may be reasonable to prepare ourselves for life without Di Canio who will be off to West Ham next no doubt what so ever, Big Sams days are numbered.
I see Benyon has gone full circle he is now back at Torquay for a month from Swindon reserves Saffend. I did notice our emergency loan of Cox to Plymouth is untill the rest of the season so does that mean we may be able to get the three signings on deadline day for the same deal. I thought the emergency loan was 93 days max or 3 months. Just a quick note to the Football League my paint has been dry for over two weeks now so what is your excuse. As a topic of discussion if Paolo were to leave then I would try and bring in Alan Curbishley who is a great manager at this level and above. I get the feeling the new board will tighten the funds if there are any that is and do not think Paolo will feel the ambition will be there. We do not know anything yet so who can predict the outcome but I do feel it may be reasonable to prepare ourselves for life without Di Canio who will be off to West Ham next no doubt what so ever, Big Sams days are numbered. Di kanny oh
  • Score: 0

8:52pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

Loius
Sat 13 Apr away at Wilson bunch of planks would be another option
Loius Sat 13 Apr away at Wilson bunch of planks would be another option spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

8:56pm Mon 11 Feb 13

louiscassius says...

spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
Loius
Sat 13 Apr away at Wilson bunch of planks would be another option
Noooo, before that buddy...

Come on lets make an away session of it.......
[quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: Loius Sat 13 Apr away at Wilson bunch of planks would be another option[/p][/quote]Noooo, before that buddy... Come on lets make an away session of it....... louiscassius
  • Score: 0

8:57pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

louiscassius wrote:
spectacles testicals wallet watch wrote:
Loius
Sat 13 Apr away at Wilson bunch of planks would be another option
Noooo, before that buddy...

Come on lets make an away session of it.......
Easter Monady it is then Donny away
[quote][p][bold]louiscassius[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spectacles testicals wallet watch[/bold] wrote: Loius Sat 13 Apr away at Wilson bunch of planks would be another option[/p][/quote]Noooo, before that buddy... Come on lets make an away session of it.......[/p][/quote]Easter Monady it is then Donny away spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

8:58pm Mon 11 Feb 13

The Jockster says...

avo wrote:
a softly softly approach eh?
.
didn't work tho.
.
Ah well, sideways and diagonally...
No no no! Has to be vertically and horizontally!
[quote][p][bold]avo[/bold] wrote: a softly softly approach eh? . didn't work tho. . Ah well, sideways and diagonally...[/p][/quote]No no no! Has to be vertically and horizontally! The Jockster
  • Score: 0

9:08pm Mon 11 Feb 13

eddyxx says...

multipostingshouldbe
banned
wrote:
Jockster,
I have to agree that the village idiot quip was unnecessary.

However to justify my desire to remain annonymous from my annonymous username (that sounds really stupid when I read it back), may I direct you to smirgs eloquent reply of 2.51pm.

Unfortunately that is his level.

That would have resulted in more name calling from both sides and had I posted under my usual name, I would have felt the need to not just defend the point I was trying to make but also my otherwise good name.

That is the only reason for posting the way I have.

Anyway, time to revert back to my preferred username.
What's the point ? Is this the
English grammar section or a debate on stfc related topics ?
[quote][p][bold]multipostingshouldbe banned[/bold] wrote: Jockster, I have to agree that the village idiot quip was unnecessary. However to justify my desire to remain annonymous from my annonymous username (that sounds really stupid when I read it back), may I direct you to smirgs eloquent reply of 2.51pm. Unfortunately that is his level. That would have resulted in more name calling from both sides and had I posted under my usual name, I would have felt the need to not just defend the point I was trying to make but also my otherwise good name. That is the only reason for posting the way I have. Anyway, time to revert back to my preferred username.[/p][/quote]What's the point ? Is this the English grammar section or a debate on stfc related topics ? eddyxx
  • Score: 0

9:13pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

eddyxx wrote:
multipostingshouldbe

banned
wrote:
Jockster,
I have to agree that the village idiot quip was unnecessary.

However to justify my desire to remain annonymous from my annonymous username (that sounds really stupid when I read it back), may I direct you to smirgs eloquent reply of 2.51pm.

Unfortunately that is his level.

That would have resulted in more name calling from both sides and had I posted under my usual name, I would have felt the need to not just defend the point I was trying to make but also my otherwise good name.

That is the only reason for posting the way I have.

Anyway, time to revert back to my preferred username.
What's the point ? Is this the
English grammar section or a debate on stfc related topics ?
I think his user name is spelt incorrectly it should read multiple quotes shoould be banned
[quote][p][bold]eddyxx[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]multipostingshouldbe banned[/bold] wrote: Jockster, I have to agree that the village idiot quip was unnecessary. However to justify my desire to remain annonymous from my annonymous username (that sounds really stupid when I read it back), may I direct you to smirgs eloquent reply of 2.51pm. Unfortunately that is his level. That would have resulted in more name calling from both sides and had I posted under my usual name, I would have felt the need to not just defend the point I was trying to make but also my otherwise good name. That is the only reason for posting the way I have. Anyway, time to revert back to my preferred username.[/p][/quote]What's the point ? Is this the English grammar section or a debate on stfc related topics ?[/p][/quote]I think his user name is spelt incorrectly it should read multiple quotes shoould be banned spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

9:15pm Mon 11 Feb 13

The Jockster says...

multipostingshouldbe
banned
wrote:
Jockster,
I have to agree that the village idiot quip was unnecessary.

However to justify my desire to remain annonymous from my annonymous username (that sounds really stupid when I read it back), may I direct you to smirgs eloquent reply of 2.51pm.

Unfortunately that is his level.

That would have resulted in more name calling from both sides and had I posted under my usual name, I would have felt the need to not just defend the point I was trying to make but also my otherwise good name.

That is the only reason for posting the way I have.

Anyway, time to revert back to my preferred username.
Multi my final say on this is thus:- Grim is Grim and he speaks his mind I. His own inimitable style. I just knew you were going to get a blast and this would have happened whatever username you used. Your mistake was to name names and if you do that with Grim you must expect an Exocet. Like I said his ascerbic wit has caused me and many others to laugh out loud and whilst much of it is probably said tongue in cheek I'd rather have his posts any day in front of some of the other anodine alternative comments we see on here. Glad you are reverting to what will hopefully be your more tolerant usual user I.D. :) That's all folks - now who said Amen???? Lol - lights up there multi there's a good chap!
[quote][p][bold]multipostingshouldbe banned[/bold] wrote: Jockster, I have to agree that the village idiot quip was unnecessary. However to justify my desire to remain annonymous from my annonymous username (that sounds really stupid when I read it back), may I direct you to smirgs eloquent reply of 2.51pm. Unfortunately that is his level. That would have resulted in more name calling from both sides and had I posted under my usual name, I would have felt the need to not just defend the point I was trying to make but also my otherwise good name. That is the only reason for posting the way I have. Anyway, time to revert back to my preferred username.[/p][/quote]Multi my final say on this is thus:- Grim is Grim and he speaks his mind I. His own inimitable style. I just knew you were going to get a blast and this would have happened whatever username you used. Your mistake was to name names and if you do that with Grim you must expect an Exocet. Like I said his ascerbic wit has caused me and many others to laugh out loud and whilst much of it is probably said tongue in cheek I'd rather have his posts any day in front of some of the other anodine alternative comments we see on here. Glad you are reverting to what will hopefully be your more tolerant usual user I.D. :) That's all folks - now who said Amen???? Lol - lights up there multi there's a good chap! The Jockster
  • Score: 0

9:32pm Mon 11 Feb 13

dreamofacleansheet2 says...

Never worked out how to copy and paste so not guilty me lord.

Clearly there are cliques on here but I'm afraid the mistake is to give a .... What they bray sometimes.

It's been mentioned that the money man behind he new board is the same bloke who funds Worcester rugby. Anyone know if true and if so anything about him?
Never worked out how to copy and paste so not guilty me lord. Clearly there are cliques on here but I'm afraid the mistake is to give a .... What they bray sometimes. It's been mentioned that the money man behind he new board is the same bloke who funds Worcester rugby. Anyone know if true and if so anything about him? dreamofacleansheet2
  • Score: 0

9:38pm Mon 11 Feb 13

multipostingshouldbebanned says...

Cecil Duckworth.

Worth approx. £30 million I believe.

His company was bought out by bosch to become the worcester bosch combi-boiler manufacturers.
Cecil Duckworth. Worth approx. £30 million I believe. His company was bought out by bosch to become the worcester bosch combi-boiler manufacturers. multipostingshouldbebanned
  • Score: 0

9:44pm Mon 11 Feb 13

the don69 says...

dreamofacleansheet2 wrote:
Never worked out how to copy and paste so not guilty me lord.

Clearly there are cliques on here but I'm afraid the mistake is to give a .... What they bray sometimes.

It's been mentioned that the money man behind he new board is the same bloke who funds Worcester rugby. Anyone know if true and if so anything about him?
Well I hope it is Cecil Duckworth,self made man,very good business,level headed,honest and loves sport and worth about £30m!!!!!!!!!!!
[quote][p][bold]dreamofacleansheet2[/bold] wrote: Never worked out how to copy and paste so not guilty me lord. Clearly there are cliques on here but I'm afraid the mistake is to give a .... What they bray sometimes. It's been mentioned that the money man behind he new board is the same bloke who funds Worcester rugby. Anyone know if true and if so anything about him?[/p][/quote]Well I hope it is Cecil Duckworth,self made man,very good business,level headed,honest and loves sport and worth about £30m!!!!!!!!!!! the don69
  • Score: 0

9:45pm Mon 11 Feb 13

joey butler says...

Malky,

Mindful ot new requirement to be brief, in your post at 8.03pm today who is Ciclo?
Your paragraph 2 refers, same as 'new poster' Calcio at weekend methinks? Over and out!!
Malky, Mindful ot new requirement to be brief, in your post at 8.03pm today who is Ciclo? Your paragraph 2 refers, same as 'new poster' Calcio at weekend methinks? Over and out!! joey butler
  • Score: 0

10:15pm Mon 11 Feb 13

dreamofacleansheet2 says...

Multi thanking you. I've know idea if true, someone put it on here but never heard of him. The don69 couldn't agree more.

If it sounds to good to be true.......
Multi thanking you. I've know idea if true, someone put it on here but never heard of him. The don69 couldn't agree more. If it sounds to good to be true....... dreamofacleansheet2
  • Score: 0

10:23pm Mon 11 Feb 13

multipostingshouldbebanned says...

You're welcome dreamo....fingers crossed that everything works out ok.
You're welcome dreamo....fingers crossed that everything works out ok. multipostingshouldbebanned
  • Score: 0

10:24pm Mon 11 Feb 13

LeckhamptonROBIN says...

Is it all over yet? When can we get back to talking about the football?

#bored
Is it all over yet? When can we get back to talking about the football? #bored LeckhamptonROBIN
  • Score: 0

10:25pm Mon 11 Feb 13

joey butler says...

Specs TWW,

Re' last week, you tried those faggots at Coate yet?
Specs TWW, Re' last week, you tried those faggots at Coate yet? joey butler
  • Score: 0

10:32pm Mon 11 Feb 13

RamsburyRed says...

the don69 wrote:
dreamofacleansheet2 wrote:
Never worked out how to copy and paste so not guilty me lord.

Clearly there are cliques on here but I'm afraid the mistake is to give a .... What they bray sometimes.

It's been mentioned that the money man behind he new board is the same bloke who funds Worcester rugby. Anyone know if true and if so anything about him?
Well I hope it is Cecil Duckworth,self made man,very good business,level headed,honest and loves sport and worth about £30m!!!!!!!!!!!
We can clean him out within about ten seasons then.
[quote][p][bold]the don69[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]dreamofacleansheet2[/bold] wrote: Never worked out how to copy and paste so not guilty me lord. Clearly there are cliques on here but I'm afraid the mistake is to give a .... What they bray sometimes. It's been mentioned that the money man behind he new board is the same bloke who funds Worcester rugby. Anyone know if true and if so anything about him?[/p][/quote]Well I hope it is Cecil Duckworth,self made man,very good business,level headed,honest and loves sport and worth about £30m!!!!!!!!!!![/p][/quote]We can clean him out within about ten seasons then. RamsburyRed
  • Score: 0

10:34pm Mon 11 Feb 13

joey butler says...

multipostingshouldbe
banned
wrote:
Jockster,
I have to agree that the village idiot quip was unnecessary.

However to justify my desire to remain annonymous from my annonymous username (that sounds really stupid when I read it back), may I direct you to smirgs eloquent reply of 2.51pm.

Unfortunately that is his level.

That would have resulted in more name calling from both sides and had I posted under my usual name, I would have felt the need to not just defend the point I was trying to make but also my otherwise good name.

That is the only reason for posting the way I have.

Anyway, time to revert back to my preferred username.
Your reference to Smirg, or 'Grim' as we know him is deeply insulting to him.

'Unfortunately that is his level' as you said, well let me tell you, the cream always floats to the surface and the rest sinks to your level in the sewers.

I think I know who you are by the way and will post it on here when I am certain.
[quote][p][bold]multipostingshouldbe banned[/bold] wrote: Jockster, I have to agree that the village idiot quip was unnecessary. However to justify my desire to remain annonymous from my annonymous username (that sounds really stupid when I read it back), may I direct you to smirgs eloquent reply of 2.51pm. Unfortunately that is his level. That would have resulted in more name calling from both sides and had I posted under my usual name, I would have felt the need to not just defend the point I was trying to make but also my otherwise good name. That is the only reason for posting the way I have. Anyway, time to revert back to my preferred username.[/p][/quote]Your reference to Smirg, or 'Grim' as we know him is deeply insulting to him. 'Unfortunately that is his level' as you said, well let me tell you, the cream always floats to the surface and the rest sinks to your level in the sewers. I think I know who you are by the way and will post it on here when I am certain. joey butler
  • Score: 0

10:51pm Mon 11 Feb 13

The Jockster says...

joey butler wrote:
Malky,

Mindful ot new requirement to be brief, in your post at 8.03pm today who is Ciclo?
Your paragraph 2 refers, same as 'new poster' Calcio at weekend methinks? Over and out!!
Joey Ciclo from Dorset been posting awhile no idea who calcio is - so who do you think multi might be? I have my suspicions also :) cheers mon ami
[quote][p][bold]joey butler[/bold] wrote: Malky, Mindful ot new requirement to be brief, in your post at 8.03pm today who is Ciclo? Your paragraph 2 refers, same as 'new poster' Calcio at weekend methinks? Over and out!![/p][/quote]Joey Ciclo from Dorset been posting awhile no idea who calcio is - so who do you think multi might be? I have my suspicions also :) cheers mon ami The Jockster
  • Score: 0

10:54pm Mon 11 Feb 13

the don69 says...

RamsburyRed wrote:
the don69 wrote:
dreamofacleansheet2 wrote:
Never worked out how to copy and paste so not guilty me lord.

Clearly there are cliques on here but I'm afraid the mistake is to give a .... What they bray sometimes.

It's been mentioned that the money man behind he new board is the same bloke who funds Worcester rugby. Anyone know if true and if so anything about him?
Well I hope it is Cecil Duckworth,self made man,very good business,level headed,honest and loves sport and worth about £30m!!!!!!!!!!!
We can clean him out within about ten seasons then.
Ten season's?that's one signing,you couldn't even buy that Camel Carrol for£30m!LOLJed Gerard McCoy McCrory,said tonight should get clearance wednesday or latest friday it goes on and on!!!!!!!!!!!
[quote][p][bold]RamsburyRed[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]the don69[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]dreamofacleansheet2[/bold] wrote: Never worked out how to copy and paste so not guilty me lord. Clearly there are cliques on here but I'm afraid the mistake is to give a .... What they bray sometimes. It's been mentioned that the money man behind he new board is the same bloke who funds Worcester rugby. Anyone know if true and if so anything about him?[/p][/quote]Well I hope it is Cecil Duckworth,self made man,very good business,level headed,honest and loves sport and worth about £30m!!!!!!!!!!![/p][/quote]We can clean him out within about ten seasons then.[/p][/quote]Ten season's?that's one signing,you couldn't even buy that Camel Carrol for£30m!LOLJed Gerard McCoy McCrory,said tonight should get clearance wednesday or latest friday it goes on and on!!!!!!!!!!! the don69
  • Score: 0

11:02pm Mon 11 Feb 13

the don69 says...

the don69 wrote:
RamsburyRed wrote:
the don69 wrote:
dreamofacleansheet2 wrote:
Never worked out how to copy and paste so not guilty me lord.

Clearly there are cliques on here but I'm afraid the mistake is to give a .... What they bray sometimes.

It's been mentioned that the money man behind he new board is the same bloke who funds Worcester rugby. Anyone know if true and if so anything about him?
Well I hope it is Cecil Duckworth,self made man,very good business,level headed,honest and loves sport and worth about £30m!!!!!!!!!!!
We can clean him out within about ten seasons then.
Ten season's?that's one signing,you couldn't even buy that Camel Carrol for£30m!LOLJed Gerard McCoy McCrory,said tonight should get clearance wednesday or latest friday it goes on and on!!!!!!!!!!!
He also says he wants to form a good relationship with supporters group and listen to fans views,he want to get the club secure and self-sustainable,sou
nds like Fitton!!!!!!!+
[quote][p][bold]the don69[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]RamsburyRed[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]the don69[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]dreamofacleansheet2[/bold] wrote: Never worked out how to copy and paste so not guilty me lord. Clearly there are cliques on here but I'm afraid the mistake is to give a .... What they bray sometimes. It's been mentioned that the money man behind he new board is the same bloke who funds Worcester rugby. Anyone know if true and if so anything about him?[/p][/quote]Well I hope it is Cecil Duckworth,self made man,very good business,level headed,honest and loves sport and worth about £30m!!!!!!!!!!![/p][/quote]We can clean him out within about ten seasons then.[/p][/quote]Ten season's?that's one signing,you couldn't even buy that Camel Carrol for£30m!LOLJed Gerard McCoy McCrory,said tonight should get clearance wednesday or latest friday it goes on and on!!!!!!!!!!![/p][/quote]He also says he wants to form a good relationship with supporters group and listen to fans views,he want to get the club secure and self-sustainable,sou nds like Fitton!!!!!!!+ the don69
  • Score: 0

11:05pm Mon 11 Feb 13

multipostingshouldbebanned says...

JB
Read his response from 2.51pm before you make a comment to me.

No comment I have made today has been abusive to anybody.

I am certain that if my comments were so insulting I would have heard from grim/smirg myself.

I am sure that he doesn't need or want you to be his mouthpiece as I know from past exchanges he is more than capable of holding his own.

With regards to naming me....go ahead, and make a fool of yourself.
JB Read his response from 2.51pm before you make a comment to me. No comment I have made today has been abusive to anybody. I am certain that if my comments were so insulting I would have heard from grim/smirg myself. I am sure that he doesn't need or want you to be his mouthpiece as I know from past exchanges he is more than capable of holding his own. With regards to naming me....go ahead, and make a fool of yourself. multipostingshouldbebanned
  • Score: 0

11:40pm Mon 11 Feb 13

joey butler says...

Well you were the person who raised his post of 2.51pm and if you read it, which indeed I did, he replied to you so you did 'hear from him', Smirg {Grim}.

The post you refer to was his reply, at 2.,51pm. please scroll up.

That is exactly why you 'heard from him', your words not mine.

When you started your own crusade at 9.29am this morning, you should surely have realised that other posters could, would and should of challenged you?

I am still working on your last line, which will be in my time, not yours.
Well you were the person who raised his post of 2.51pm and if you read it, which indeed I did, he replied to you so you did 'hear from him', Smirg {Grim}. The post you refer to was his reply, at 2.,51pm. please scroll up. That is exactly why you 'heard from him', your words not mine. When you started your own crusade at 9.29am this morning, you should surely have realised that other posters could, would and should of challenged you? I am still working on your last line, which will be in my time, not yours. joey butler
  • Score: 0

12:20am Tue 12 Feb 13

multipostingshouldbebanned says...

Sorry JB,
I wasn't aware that you are one of our more challenged friends'.

There is quite clearly no point in taking this further with you as you lack the mental capacity to follow a timeline.

In fact when I look at some of your previous posts, I realise that I am aware that you are one of our more challenged friends'.

Night, night.
Sorry JB, I wasn't aware that you are one of our more challenged friends'. There is quite clearly no point in taking this further with you as you lack the mental capacity to follow a timeline. In fact when I look at some of your previous posts, I realise that I am aware that you are one of our more challenged friends'. Night, night. multipostingshouldbebanned
  • Score: 0

12:38am Tue 12 Feb 13

joey butler says...

multipostingshouldbe
banned
wrote:
Sorry JB,
I wasn't aware that you are one of our more challenged friends'.

There is quite clearly no point in taking this further with you as you lack the mental capacity to follow a timeline.

In fact when I look at some of your previous posts, I realise that I am aware that you are one of our more challenged friends'.

Night, night.
You nearly had me reaching for my Oxford-Witney English Dictionary there, but no, I like you to much to put you on the ropes late at night.

That can wait!

''They don't like it up 'em, Captain Mainwaring'' or indeed do you and I know who you are!!

Happy days, 40-30 to me, to be continued....
[quote][p][bold]multipostingshouldbe banned[/bold] wrote: Sorry JB, I wasn't aware that you are one of our more challenged friends'. There is quite clearly no point in taking this further with you as you lack the mental capacity to follow a timeline. In fact when I look at some of your previous posts, I realise that I am aware that you are one of our more challenged friends'. Night, night.[/p][/quote]You nearly had me reaching for my Oxford-Witney English Dictionary there, but no, I like you to much to put you on the ropes late at night. That can wait! ''They don't like it up 'em, Captain Mainwaring'' or indeed do you and I know who you are!! Happy days, 40-30 to me, to be continued.... joey butler
  • Score: 0

7:03am Tue 12 Feb 13

multipostingshouldbebanned says...

Sorry to disappoint, but if you are suggesting something of a yellow tinge, you are sadly mistaken.

Duece, I believe
Sorry to disappoint, but if you are suggesting something of a yellow tinge, you are sadly mistaken. Duece, I believe multipostingshouldbebanned
  • Score: 0

7:47am Tue 12 Feb 13

buckobassettboy says...

smirg kcab wrote:
Just like to add another view from Saturday, I thought hpool was one of the best bottom sides to play football at the c/g yes we should have won perhaps by a big margin, but we didn't and I was very impressed the way they kept the ball, they had more possession than us, they meet Pompey at home tomorrow and will get off the bottom.
Two frustrating games against them but hey ho we look forward to trannie.
Onwards and upwards
How refreshing to see something relating to football on this forum.I posted my thoughts of how things really were yesterday,1.38 to be precise, and not one return quote to agree or disagree.Just a forum full of uninformed crap that has no place on here.May I suggest those using this site as an internet chat room exchange telephone numbers or e-mail address and do your tittle tattle elsewhere.
I am so disenchanted with the whole chain of events that surround my club,it sickens me to the core.I reiterate,its a **** run club,always has been and I will need convincing with hard facts to change my views.However,my support for the people that matter,the players and manager,is undying.Swindon 'til i die
[quote][p][bold]smirg kcab[/bold] wrote: Just like to add another view from Saturday, I thought hpool was one of the best bottom sides to play football at the c/g yes we should have won perhaps by a big margin, but we didn't and I was very impressed the way they kept the ball, they had more possession than us, they meet Pompey at home tomorrow and will get off the bottom. Two frustrating games against them but hey ho we look forward to trannie. Onwards and upwards[/p][/quote]How refreshing to see something relating to football on this forum.I posted my thoughts of how things really were yesterday,1.38 to be precise, and not one return quote to agree or disagree.Just a forum full of uninformed crap that has no place on here.May I suggest those using this site as an internet chat room exchange telephone numbers or e-mail address and do your tittle tattle elsewhere. I am so disenchanted with the whole chain of events that surround my club,it sickens me to the core.I reiterate,its a **** run club,always has been and I will need convincing with hard facts to change my views.However,my support for the people that matter,the players and manager,is undying.Swindon 'til i die buckobassettboy
  • Score: 0

1:24pm Tue 12 Feb 13

Swindon1984 says...

joey butler wrote:
multipostingshouldbe banned wrote: Jockster, I have to agree that the village idiot quip was unnecessary. However to justify my desire to remain annonymous from my annonymous username (that sounds really stupid when I read it back), may I direct you to smirgs eloquent reply of 2.51pm. Unfortunately that is his level. That would have resulted in more name calling from both sides and had I posted under my usual name, I would have felt the need to not just defend the point I was trying to make but also my otherwise good name. That is the only reason for posting the way I have. Anyway, time to revert back to my preferred username.
Your reference to Smirg, or 'Grim' as we know him is deeply insulting to him. 'Unfortunately that is his level' as you said, well let me tell you, the cream always floats to the surface and the rest sinks to your level in the sewers. I think I know who you are by the way and will post it on here when I am certain.
Does anyone really care who it is? Wouldn't think it's worth wasting any time on anyway.

buckobassettboy - agreed, far too much bickering cr@p on here.
[quote][p][bold]joey butler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]multipostingshouldbe banned[/bold] wrote: Jockster, I have to agree that the village idiot quip was unnecessary. However to justify my desire to remain annonymous from my annonymous username (that sounds really stupid when I read it back), may I direct you to smirgs eloquent reply of 2.51pm. Unfortunately that is his level. That would have resulted in more name calling from both sides and had I posted under my usual name, I would have felt the need to not just defend the point I was trying to make but also my otherwise good name. That is the only reason for posting the way I have. Anyway, time to revert back to my preferred username.[/p][/quote]Your reference to Smirg, or 'Grim' as we know him is deeply insulting to him. 'Unfortunately that is his level' as you said, well let me tell you, the cream always floats to the surface and the rest sinks to your level in the sewers. I think I know who you are by the way and will post it on here when I am certain.[/p][/quote]Does anyone really care who it is? Wouldn't think it's worth wasting any time on anyway. buckobassettboy - agreed, far too much bickering cr@p on here. Swindon1984
  • Score: 0

2:19pm Tue 12 Feb 13

spectacles testicals wallet watch says...

joey butler wrote:
Specs TWW,

Re' last week, you tried those faggots at Coate yet?
Mate i cant even remember what it was about senior moment and all that!!!
Infact yes Guv
[quote][p][bold]joey butler[/bold] wrote: Specs TWW, Re' last week, you tried those faggots at Coate yet?[/p][/quote]Mate i cant even remember what it was about senior moment and all that!!! Infact yes Guv spectacles testicals wallet watch
  • Score: 0

11:32pm Tue 12 Feb 13

joey butler says...

multipostingshouldbe
banned
wrote:
Sorry to disappoint, but if you are suggesting something of a yellow tinge, you are sadly mistaken.

Duece, I believe
Sorry old chap, but ''Duece'' is not in my Oxford-Witney English Dictionary?

I think you perhaps were thinking of ''Deuce''.

Nevertheless, I fully accept the spirit of a draw with you!!
[quote][p][bold]multipostingshouldbe banned[/bold] wrote: Sorry to disappoint, but if you are suggesting something of a yellow tinge, you are sadly mistaken. Duece, I believe[/p][/quote]Sorry old chap, but ''Duece'' is not in my Oxford-Witney English Dictionary? I think you perhaps were thinking of ''Deuce''. Nevertheless, I fully accept the spirit of a draw with you!! joey butler
  • Score: 0

1:52am Wed 13 Feb 13

multipostingshouldbebanned says...

JB

I feel like I have travelled full circle now.....a draw it is.

I can now finally place "multi" in the bin.

:-)
JB I feel like I have travelled full circle now.....a draw it is. I can now finally place "multi" in the bin. :-) multipostingshouldbebanned
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree